From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Tamas Petz <tamas.petz@arm.com>,
Tamas Zsoldos <tamas.zsoldos@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor AUX flag setting
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:43:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251210154308.GZ724103@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a638f74f-94bc-4052-b8e1-e940aca2d4ce@linaro.org>
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 01:37:39PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
[...]
> > + if (!is_trbe_running(trbsr))
> > + perf_aux_output_flag(handle, PERF_AUX_FLAG_COLLISION);
> > +
>
> Do we need the complexity of COLLISION (changed to PARTIAL in a later
> commit) and TRUNCATED at the same time?
> From my understanding, TRUNCATED would be when Perf is too slow and we want
> to disable the event for it to catch up, and PARTIAL is when there was some
> buffer error so technically we don't need the event to be disabled, but Perf
> still needs to be notified if we want to start only resetting the decoder
> when a flag is set rather than on all aux records?
The main difference between the TRUNCATED flag and the COLLISION/PARTIAL
flags is that the TRUNCATED flag implicitly asks the event core layer to
disable the PMU event. In contrast, the COLLISION and PARTIAL flags are
only stored in AUX record and no additional action in the event core
layer.
Setting the TRUNCATED flag would be a over-killer if the buffer has
free space, as it would run the expensive sequence of disabling both ETE
and TRBE and then requiring userspace to re-enable them.
> There is no happy path where there is a buffer error, so I'm not sure why we
> need the complexity of an extra case? There's no harm in disabling the event
> on a buffer error. Also it's hard to see what the exact scenario for PARTIAL
> is, because we set truncated anyway for fatal statuses. The comment in the
> later commit for the PARTIAL change just says "trace was stopped", but not
> why.
The trace can be stopped on Fill mode (stop on wrap) or Stop on trigger, so
it is not (only) about buffer error. In these cases, even though the trace
unit is stopped, the buffer may still have space available, tracing can be
directly re-enabled in interrupt handler, thus the COLLISION/PARTIAL flags
are better choices.
Only when the buffer is actually used out (i.e., handle->size == 0), it is
appropriate to set TRUNCATED flag, since at that point we must wait for
userspace to read out the data.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 11:21 [PATCH 00/19] coresight: trbe: Support trigger and circle buffer modes Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 01/19] coresight: trbe: Use helpers for checking errata Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:08 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 02/19] coresight: trbe: Remove redundant disable operation Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:25 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 03/19] coresight: trbe: Remove buffer disabling in trbe_handle_overflow() Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:31 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 04/19] coresight: trbe: Remove set_trbe_disabled() from the enable flow Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04 13:25 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 05/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor status clearing Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-09 15:29 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 06/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor syndrome decoding Leo Yan
2025-12-02 11:06 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-02 14:24 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-09 13:17 ` James Clark
2025-12-09 16:06 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-05 4:10 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-09 15:57 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 07/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor AUX flag setting Leo Yan
2025-12-02 11:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-02 14:21 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-09 13:37 ` James Clark
2025-12-10 15:43 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-12-12 14:50 ` James Clark
2025-12-12 15:27 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-12 15:52 ` James Clark
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 08/19] coresight: trbe: Use PERF_AUX_FLAG_PARTIAL instead of PERF_AUX_FLAG_COLLISION Leo Yan
2025-12-05 4:28 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-09 13:40 ` James Clark
2025-12-10 16:19 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 09/19] coresight: trbe: Add fault action argument to trbe_handle_overflow() Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 10/19] coresight: trbe: Always check fault action when updating buffer Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:00 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 11/19] coresight: trbe: Apply overwrite erratum for only wrap event Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-02 16:56 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 17:12 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 12/19] coresight: trbe: Calculate size for buffer wrapping Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 13/19] coresight: trbe: Remove misleading comment Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 14/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor compute_trbe_buffer_limit() Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 15/19] coresight: trbe: Add static key for bypassing trigger mode Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 16/19] coresight: trbe: Support " Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 17/19] coresight: trbe: Enable circle mode for snapshot Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 18/19] coresight: trbe: Add kunit tests Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 19/19] perf: cs-etm: Set watermark for AUX trace Leo Yan
2025-12-05 4:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-09 14:54 ` James Clark
2025-12-10 2:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-05 4:53 ` [PATCH 00/19] coresight: trbe: Support trigger and circle buffer modes Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251210154308.GZ724103@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tamas.petz@arm.com \
--cc=tamas.zsoldos@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).