From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
acme@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, justinstitt@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, morbo@google.com,
nathan@kernel.org, nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf build: Support passing extra Clang options via EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:39:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251211103957.GA4048253@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADHxFxQ2kb2pRhn0-_PJwmo9pykHzDMJDPQay5GaqmmZF1nwSw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 09:44:02PM +0800, hupu wrote:
Please don't spam on mailing list as you did. It is really bad practice.
You could find resources [1][2] to learn upstreaming and co-work on the
ML.
> The eBPF skeleton is compiled via clang --target=bpf, and its header
> file search paths mainly come from BPF_INCLUDE and TOOLS_UAPI_INCLUDE.
> It also uses '-idirafter' to include the host’s /usr/local/include and
> /usr/include directories in the search path. This process is not
> directly coupled with cross-compilation managed via pkg-config, which
> means PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR does not affect how the skeleton resolves
> its headers.
Based on my limited knowledge, Clang does not provide its own headers.
It needs to rely on GCC's headers for compilation. I do see the
Makefile does right thing for finding headers:
Makefile.perf:1203: ***
CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES=-idirafter /usr/lib/llvm-18/lib/clang/18/include
-idirafter /usr/local/include
-idirafter /usr/bin/../lib/gcc-cross/aarch64-linux-gnu/14/../../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/include
-idirafter /usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu
-idirafter /usr/include
It is mess to add some random include paths and feed to clang. We
already have provided a reliable way for building eBPF skelton program
- keep in mind, eBPF skeleton program is not any aarch64 cross
compilation, we just use clang for building bpf target.
My understanding is you don't have a sane setting up on your local
building env.
Thanks,
Leo
[1] https://static.linaro.org/connect/hkg18/presentations/hkg18-tr02.pdf
[2] https://static.linaro.org/connect/hkg18/presentations/hkg18-tr03.pdf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 8:06 [RFC] perf build: Allow passing extra Clang flags via EXTRA_CLANG_FLAGS hupu
2025-10-13 8:07 ` hupu
2025-10-13 15:46 ` Ian Rogers
2025-10-13 16:14 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-14 2:31 ` hupu
2025-10-15 9:30 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-15 11:47 ` hupu
2025-10-15 12:55 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-18 10:05 ` hupu
2025-10-19 2:30 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-19 7:57 ` hupu
2025-10-20 1:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-20 2:38 ` hupu
2025-10-20 2:40 ` [PATCH] perf build: Support passing extra Clang options via EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS hupu
2025-10-20 4:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-20 8:00 ` hupu
2025-10-20 8:02 ` hupu
2025-10-20 10:15 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-20 12:51 ` hupu
2025-10-20 13:02 ` hupu
2025-10-21 3:11 ` hupu
2025-11-18 7:18 ` hupu
2025-11-18 7:28 ` hupu
2025-11-19 9:43 ` hupu
2025-11-20 19:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-21 10:17 ` hupu
2025-11-24 7:26 ` hupu
2025-11-24 7:34 ` hupu
2025-11-25 8:13 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-25 12:52 ` hupu
2025-11-25 13:07 ` hupu
2025-11-25 16:10 ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 13:44 ` hupu
2025-12-05 6:33 ` hupu
2025-12-08 9:05 ` hupu
2025-12-10 10:24 ` hupu
2025-12-11 10:39 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-12-12 6:12 ` hupu
2025-10-20 13:50 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-20 2:45 ` hupu
2025-10-14 1:57 ` [RFC] perf build: Allow passing extra Clang flags via EXTRA_CLANG_FLAGS hupu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251211103957.GA4048253@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hupu.gm@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).