* [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
2025-12-14 19:09 [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching Xie Yuanbin
@ 2025-12-14 19:09 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-15 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-12-14 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline Xie Yuanbin
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2025-12-14 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, peterz, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd, acme, adrian.hunter,
agordeev, akpm, alex, alexander.shishkin, andreas,
anshuman.khandual, aou, borntraeger, bp, bsegall, dave.hansen,
davem, dietmar.eggemann, frederic, gor, hca, irogers, james.clark,
jolsa, juri.lelli, justinstitt, lorenzo.stoakes, luto,
mark.rutland, mathieu.desnoyers, max.kellermann, mgorman, mingo,
morbo, namhyung, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, nysal, palmer,
paulmck, pjw, rostedt, ryan.roberts, svens, thuth, urezki,
vincent.guittot, vschneid, linux
Cc: linux-kernel, x86, linux-arm-kernel, linux-riscv, linux-s390,
sparclinux, linux-perf-users, llvm
enter_lazy_tlb() on x86 is short enough, and is called in context
switching, which is the hot code path.
Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 to optimize performance.
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511091959.kfmo9kPB-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511092219.73aMMES4-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511100042.ZklpqjOY-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 21 ---------------------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 73bf3b1b44e8..ecd134dcfb34 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -136,8 +136,29 @@ static inline void mm_reset_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
}
#endif
+/*
+ * Please ignore the name of this function. It should be called
+ * switch_to_kernel_thread().
+ *
+ * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a
+ * kernel thread or other context without an mm. Acceptable implementations
+ * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
+ * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
+ *
+ * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
+ * in a row. It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
+ * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
+ */
#define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb
-extern void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk);
+#ifndef MODULE
+static __always_inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
+ return;
+
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
+}
+#endif
#define mm_init_global_asid mm_init_global_asid
extern void mm_init_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index f5b93e01e347..71abaf0bdb91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -971,27 +971,6 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
}
}
-/*
- * Please ignore the name of this function. It should be called
- * switch_to_kernel_thread().
- *
- * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a
- * kernel thread or other context without an mm. Acceptable implementations
- * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
- * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
- *
- * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
- * in a row. It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
- * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
- */
-void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
- return;
-
- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
-}
-
/*
* Using a temporary mm allows to set temporary mappings that are not accessible
* by other CPUs. Such mappings are needed to perform sensitive memory writes
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
2025-12-14 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Xie Yuanbin
@ 2025-12-15 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-12-16 15:49 ` Xie Yuanbin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2025-12-15 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xie Yuanbin, peterz, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd, acme,
adrian.hunter, agordeev, akpm, alex, alexander.shishkin, andreas,
anshuman.khandual, aou, borntraeger, bp, bsegall, dave.hansen,
davem, dietmar.eggemann, frederic, gor, hca, irogers, james.clark,
jolsa, juri.lelli, justinstitt, lorenzo.stoakes, luto,
mark.rutland, mathieu.desnoyers, max.kellermann, mgorman, mingo,
morbo, namhyung, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, nysal, palmer,
paulmck, pjw, rostedt, ryan.roberts, svens, thuth, urezki,
vincent.guittot, vschneid, linux
Cc: linux-kernel, x86, linux-arm-kernel, linux-riscv, linux-s390,
sparclinux, linux-perf-users, llvm
On Mon, Dec 15 2025 at 03:09, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> enter_lazy_tlb() on x86 is short enough, and is called in context
> switching, which is the hot code path.
>
> Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 to optimize performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511091959.kfmo9kPB-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511092219.73aMMES4-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511100042.ZklpqjOY-lkp@intel.com/
These Reported-by and Closes tags are just wrong. This is a new patch
and the robot reported failures against earlier versions. The robot
report is very clear about that:
"If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
Reported-by:...
Closes:..."
No?
> +/*
> + * Please ignore the name of this function. It should be called
> + * switch_to_kernel_thread().
And why is it not renamed then?
> + *
> + * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a
We enter a kernel thread? AFAIK the metaverse has been canceled.
> + * kernel thread or other context without an mm. Acceptable implementations
> + * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
> + * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
> + *
> + * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
> + * in a row. It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
It will notify us by sending email or what?
> + * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
> + */
> #define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb
> -extern void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk);
> +#ifndef MODULE
> +static __always_inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
> + return;
> +
> + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
> +}
Please move the '#define enter_....' under the inline function. That's
way simpler to read.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
2025-12-15 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2025-12-16 15:49 ` Xie Yuanbin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2025-12-16 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx
Cc: acme, adrian.hunter, agordeev, akpm, alex, alexander.shishkin,
andreas, anshuman.khandual, aou, arnd, borntraeger, bp, bsegall,
dave.hansen, davem, david, dietmar.eggemann, frederic, gor, hca,
hpa, irogers, james.clark, jolsa, juri.lelli, justinstitt,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, linux-riscv,
linux-s390, linux, llvm, lorenzo.stoakes, luto, mark.rutland,
mathieu.desnoyers, max.kellermann, mgorman, mingo, morbo,
namhyung, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, nysal, palmer, paulmck,
peterz, pjw, qq570070308, riel, rostedt, ryan.roberts, segher,
sparclinux, svens, thuth, urezki, vincent.guittot, vschneid, x86
On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:42:13 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> These Reported-by and Closes tags are just wrong. This is a new patch
> and the robot reported failures against earlier versions. The robot
> report is very clear about that:
>
> "If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> Reported-by:...
> Closes:..."
>
> No?
>
> [...]
>
> Please move the '#define enter_....' under the inline function. That's
> way simpler to read.
Thanks for replying, I will improve it in the V6 patch.
>> +/*
>> + * Please ignore the name of this function. It should be called
>> + * switch_to_kernel_thread().
>
> And why is it not renamed then?
>
>> + *
>> + * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a
>
> We enter a kernel thread? AFAIK the metaverse has been canceled.
>
>> + * kernel thread or other context without an mm. Acceptable implementations
>> + * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
>> + * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
>> + *
>> + * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
>> + * in a row. It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
>
> It will notify us by sending email or what?
I didn't write any comments, I just moved its location.
As for the content of the comment, I think it has nothing to do with this
patch. If the content of the comment needs to be modified, it should be
modified in another patch?
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline
2025-12-14 19:09 [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-14 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Xie Yuanbin
@ 2025-12-14 19:09 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-14 23:39 ` Rik van Riel
2025-12-14 19:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] sched/core: Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-15 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching Xie Yuanbin
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2025-12-14 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, peterz, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd, acme, adrian.hunter,
agordeev, akpm, alex, alexander.shishkin, andreas,
anshuman.khandual, aou, borntraeger, bp, bsegall, dave.hansen,
davem, dietmar.eggemann, frederic, gor, hca, irogers, james.clark,
jolsa, juri.lelli, justinstitt, lorenzo.stoakes, luto,
mark.rutland, mathieu.desnoyers, max.kellermann, mgorman, mingo,
morbo, namhyung, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, nysal, palmer,
paulmck, pjw, rostedt, ryan.roberts, svens, thuth, urezki,
vincent.guittot, vschneid, linux
Cc: linux-kernel, x86, linux-arm-kernel, linux-riscv, linux-s390,
sparclinux, linux-perf-users, llvm
raw_spin_rq_unlock() is short, and is called in some hot code paths
such as finish_lock_switch.
Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline to optimize performance.
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 -----
kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 41ba0be16911..20146da3f181 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -678,11 +678,6 @@ bool raw_spin_rq_trylock(struct rq *rq)
}
}
-void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
-{
- raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq));
-}
-
/*
* double_rq_lock - safely lock two runqueues
*/
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index d30cca6870f5..bef6cb13266d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1551,13 +1551,17 @@ static inline void lockdep_assert_rq_held(struct rq *rq)
extern void raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(struct rq *rq, int subclass);
extern bool raw_spin_rq_trylock(struct rq *rq);
-extern void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq);
static inline void raw_spin_rq_lock(struct rq *rq)
{
raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(rq, 0);
}
+static inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq));
+}
+
static inline void raw_spin_rq_lock_irq(struct rq *rq)
{
local_irq_disable();
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline
2025-12-14 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline Xie Yuanbin
@ 2025-12-14 23:39 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2025-12-14 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xie Yuanbin, tglx, peterz, segher, david, hpa, arnd, acme,
adrian.hunter, agordeev, akpm, alex, alexander.shishkin, andreas,
anshuman.khandual, aou, borntraeger, bp, bsegall, dave.hansen,
davem, dietmar.eggemann, frederic, gor, hca, irogers, james.clark,
jolsa, juri.lelli, justinstitt, lorenzo.stoakes, luto,
mark.rutland, mathieu.desnoyers, max.kellermann, mgorman, mingo,
morbo, namhyung, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, nysal, palmer,
paulmck, pjw, rostedt, ryan.roberts, svens, thuth, urezki,
vincent.guittot, vschneid, linux
Cc: linux-kernel, x86, linux-arm-kernel, linux-riscv, linux-s390,
sparclinux, linux-perf-users, llvm
On Mon, 2025-12-15 at 03:09 +0800, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> raw_spin_rq_unlock() is short, and is called in some hot code paths
> such as finish_lock_switch.
>
> Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline to optimize performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
--
All Rights Reversed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 3/3] sched/core: Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline
2025-12-14 19:09 [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-14 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-14 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline Xie Yuanbin
@ 2025-12-14 19:13 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-15 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching Xie Yuanbin
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2025-12-14 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, peterz, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd, acme, adrian.hunter,
agordeev, akpm, alex, alexander.shishkin, andreas,
anshuman.khandual, aou, borntraeger, bp, bsegall, dave.hansen,
davem, dietmar.eggemann, frederic, gor, hca, irogers, james.clark,
jolsa, juri.lelli, justinstitt, lorenzo.stoakes, luto,
mark.rutland, mathieu.desnoyers, max.kellermann, mgorman, mingo,
morbo, namhyung, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, nysal, palmer,
paulmck, pjw, rostedt, ryan.roberts, svens, thuth, urezki,
vincent.guittot, vschneid, linux
Cc: linux-kernel, x86, linux-arm-kernel, linux-riscv, linux-s390,
sparclinux, linux-perf-users, llvm
finish_task_switch() is a hot code path in context switching.
Depending on the cpu's vulnerability and mitigation configuration, kernel
will likely perform mitigations in switch_mm_irqs_off() and switch_to(),
which may include branch prediction hardening, clearing the instruction
cache and L1D cache, etc.
finish_task_switch() is right after switch_mm_irqs_off() and switch_to(),
the performance here is greatly affected by function calls and branch
jumps.
Make finish_task_switch() always inline to optimize performance.
After finish_task_switch() is changed as always inline, the number of
calling points of subfunctions increases. According to the compiler
optimization strategy, subfunctions that were originally inline may no
longer be inline.
Also make the subfunctions of finish_task_stwitch() always inline to
prevent performance degradation.
Performance test data - time spent on calling finish_task_switch():
1. x86-64: Intel i5-8300h@4Ghz, DDR4@2666mhz; unit: x86's tsc
| test scenario | old | new | delta |
| gcc 15.2 | 27.50 | 25.45 | -2.05 ( -7.5%) |
| gcc 15.2 + spectre_v2_user=on | 46.75 | 25.96 | -20.79 (-44.5%) |
| clang 21.1.7 | 27.25 | 25.45 | -1.80 ( -6.6%) |
| clang 21.1.7 + spectre_v2_user=on | 39.50 | 26.00 | -13.50 (-34.2%) |
2. x86-64: AMD 9600x@5.45Ghz, DDR5@4800mhz; unit: x86's tsc
| test scenario | old | new | delta |
| gcc 15.2 | 27.51 | 27.51 | 0 ( 0%) |
| gcc 15.2 + spectre_v2_user=on | 105.21 | 67.89 | -37.32 (-35.5%) |
| clang 21.1.7 | 27.51 | 27.51 | 0 ( 0%) |
| clang 21.1.7 + spectre_v2_user=on | 104.15 | 67.52 | -36.63 (-35.2%) |
3. arm64: Raspberry Pi 3b Rev 1.2, Cortex-A53@1.2Ghz; unit: cntvct_el0
| test scenario | old | new | delta |
| gcc 15.2 | 1.453 | 1.115 | -0.338 (-23.3%) |
| clang 21.1.7 | 1.532 | 1.123 | -0.409 (-26.7%) |
4. arm32: Raspberry Pi 3b Rev 1.2, Cortex-A53@1.2Ghz; unit: cntvct_el0
| test scenario | old | new | delta |
| gcc 15.2 | 1.421 | 1.187 | -0.234 (-16.5%) |
| clang 21.1.7 | 1.437 | 1.200 | -0.237 (-16.5%) |
Size test data:
1. bzImage size:
| test scenario | old | new | delta |
| gcc 15.2 + -Os | 12604416 | 12604416 | 0 |
| gcc 15.2 + -O2 | 14500864 | 14500864 | 0 |
| clang 21.1.7 + -Os | 13718528 | 13718528 | 0 |
| clang 21.1.7 + -O2 | 14558208 | 14566400 | 8192 |
2. sizeof .text section from vmlinx:
| test scenario | old | new | delta |
| gcc 15.2 + -Os | 16180040 | 16180616 | 576 |
| gcc 15.2 + -O2 | 19556424 | 19561352 | 4928 |
| clang 21.1.7 + -Os | 17917832 | 17918664 | 832 |
| clang 21.1.7 + -O2 | 20030856 | 20035784 | 4928 |
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
The detailed information of the test can be found in the cover letter:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251214190907.184793-1-qq570070308@gmail.com
arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h | 2 +-
arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 +-
arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h | 2 +-
include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
include/linux/sched/mm.h | 10 +++++-----
include/linux/tick.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/vtime.h | 8 ++++----
kernel/sched/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
11 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index db2cb06aa8cf..bebde469f81a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
#ifndef MODULE
#define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
finish_arch_post_lock_switch
-static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
+static __always_inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h
index 9153016da8f1..2fe6b7fe6b12 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
* RISC-V implements return to user-space through an xRET instruction,
* which is not core serializing.
*/
-static inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
+static __always_inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
{
asm volatile ("fence.i" ::: "memory");
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index d9b8501bc93d..c124ef6a01b3 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
}
#define finish_arch_post_lock_switch finish_arch_post_lock_switch
-static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
+static __always_inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
index 78bbacc14d2d..d1967214ef25 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static inline void arch_start_context_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
}
#define finish_arch_post_lock_switch finish_arch_post_lock_switch
-static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
+static __always_inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
{
/* Restore the state of MCDPER register for the new process
* just switched to.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
index 96bda43538ee..4b55fa353bb5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static __always_inline void sync_core(void)
* to user-mode. x86 implements return to user-space through sysexit,
* sysrel, and sysretq, which are not core serializing.
*/
-static inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
+static __always_inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
{
/* With PTI, we unconditionally serialize before running user code. */
if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 9870d768db4c..d9de20c20f38 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_migrate(struct task_struct *task)
task->sched_migrated = 1;
}
-static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+static __always_inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task)
{
if (static_branch_unlikely(&perf_sched_events))
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
index 0e1d73955fa5..e7787a6e7d22 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void smp_mb__after_mmgrab(void)
extern void __mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm);
-static inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
/*
* The implicit full barrier implied by atomic_dec_and_test() is
@@ -71,14 +71,14 @@ static inline void __mmdrop_delayed(struct rcu_head *rhp)
* Invoked from finish_task_switch(). Delegates the heavy lifting on RT
* kernels via RCU.
*/
-static inline void mmdrop_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void mmdrop_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
/* Provides a full memory barrier. See mmdrop() */
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->mm_count))
call_rcu(&mm->delayed_drop, __mmdrop_delayed);
}
#else
-static inline void mmdrop_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void mmdrop_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mmdrop(mm);
}
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static inline void mmdrop_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm)
}
}
-static inline void mmdrop_lazy_tlb_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void mmdrop_lazy_tlb_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU_LAZY_TLB_REFCOUNT))
mmdrop_sched(mm);
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ enum {
#include <asm/membarrier.h>
#endif
-static inline void membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
/*
* The atomic_read() below prevents CSE. The following should
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index ac76ae9fa36d..fce16aa10ba2 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
extern bool tick_nohz_full_running;
-static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void)
+static __always_inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void)
{
if (!context_tracking_enabled())
return false;
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static inline void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask) { }
#endif
-static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
+static __always_inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
{
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
__tick_nohz_task_switch();
diff --git a/include/linux/vtime.h b/include/linux/vtime.h
index 29dd5b91dd7d..428464bb81b3 100644
--- a/include/linux/vtime.h
+++ b/include/linux/vtime.h
@@ -67,24 +67,24 @@ static __always_inline void vtime_account_guest_exit(void)
* For now vtime state is tied to context tracking. We might want to decouple
* those later if necessary.
*/
-static inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled(void)
+static __always_inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled(void)
{
return context_tracking_enabled();
}
-static inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled_cpu(int cpu)
+static __always_inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled_cpu(int cpu)
{
return context_tracking_enabled_cpu(cpu);
}
-static inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu(void)
+static __always_inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu(void)
{
return context_tracking_enabled_this_cpu();
}
extern void vtime_task_switch_generic(struct task_struct *prev);
-static inline void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
+static __always_inline void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
{
if (vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu())
vtime_task_switch_generic(prev);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 20146da3f181..9f3e8fe0c5b8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4864,7 +4864,7 @@ static inline void prepare_task(struct task_struct *next)
WRITE_ONCE(next->on_cpu, 1);
}
-static inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev)
+static __always_inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev)
{
/*
* This must be the very last reference to @prev from this CPU. After
@@ -4880,7 +4880,7 @@ static inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev)
smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0);
}
-static void do_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct balance_callback *head)
+static __always_inline void do_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct balance_callback *head)
{
void (*func)(struct rq *rq);
struct balance_callback *next;
@@ -4915,7 +4915,7 @@ struct balance_callback balance_push_callback = {
.func = balance_push,
};
-static inline struct balance_callback *
+static __always_inline struct balance_callback *
__splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, bool split)
{
struct balance_callback *head = rq->balance_callback;
@@ -4945,7 +4945,7 @@ struct balance_callback *splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq)
return __splice_balance_callbacks(rq, true);
}
-static void __balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void __balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq)
{
do_balance_callbacks(rq, __splice_balance_callbacks(rq, false));
}
@@ -4978,7 +4978,7 @@ prepare_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf
#endif
}
-static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq)
{
/*
* If we are tracking spinlock dependencies then we have to
@@ -5010,7 +5010,7 @@ static inline void kmap_local_sched_out(void)
#endif
}
-static inline void kmap_local_sched_in(void)
+static __always_inline void kmap_local_sched_in(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_KMAP_LOCAL
if (unlikely(current->kmap_ctrl.idx))
@@ -5063,7 +5063,7 @@ prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
* past. 'prev == current' is still correct but we need to recalculate this_rq
* because prev may have moved to another CPU.
*/
-static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
+static __always_inline struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
__releases(rq->lock)
{
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index bef6cb13266d..4ba122a15fb2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1381,12 +1381,12 @@ static inline struct cpumask *sched_group_span(struct sched_group *sg);
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(__sched_core_enabled);
-static inline bool sched_core_enabled(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline bool sched_core_enabled(struct rq *rq)
{
return static_branch_unlikely(&__sched_core_enabled) && rq->core_enabled;
}
-static inline bool sched_core_disabled(void)
+static __always_inline bool sched_core_disabled(void)
{
return !static_branch_unlikely(&__sched_core_enabled);
}
@@ -1395,7 +1395,7 @@ static inline bool sched_core_disabled(void)
* Be careful with this function; not for general use. The return value isn't
* stable unless you actually hold a relevant rq->__lock.
*/
-static inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
{
if (sched_core_enabled(rq))
return &rq->core->__lock;
@@ -1403,7 +1403,7 @@ static inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
return &rq->__lock;
}
-static inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
{
if (rq->core_enabled)
return &rq->core->__lock;
@@ -1497,12 +1497,12 @@ static inline bool sched_core_disabled(void)
return true;
}
-static inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
{
return &rq->__lock;
}
-static inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
{
return &rq->__lock;
}
@@ -1552,23 +1552,23 @@ static inline void lockdep_assert_rq_held(struct rq *rq)
extern void raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(struct rq *rq, int subclass);
extern bool raw_spin_rq_trylock(struct rq *rq);
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_lock(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_lock(struct rq *rq)
{
raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(rq, 0);
}
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
{
raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq));
}
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_lock_irq(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_lock_irq(struct rq *rq)
{
local_irq_disable();
raw_spin_rq_lock(rq);
}
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock_irq(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock_irq(struct rq *rq)
{
raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq);
local_irq_enable();
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching
2025-12-14 19:09 [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching Xie Yuanbin
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-12-14 19:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] sched/core: Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline Xie Yuanbin
@ 2025-12-15 13:10 ` Xie Yuanbin
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2025-12-15 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, peterz, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd, akpm, acme,
adrian.hunter, agordeev, alex, alexander.shishkin, andreas,
anshuman.khandual, aou, borntraeger, bp, bsegall, dave.hansen,
davem, dietmar.eggemann, frederic, gor, hca, irogers, james.clark,
jolsa, juri.lelli, justinstitt, lorenzo.stoakes, luto,
mark.rutland, mathieu.desnoyers, max.kellermann, mgorman, mingo,
morbo, namhyung, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, nysal, palmer,
paulmck, pjw, rostedt, ryan.roberts, svens, thuth, urezki,
vincent.guittot, vschneid, linux
Cc: linux-kernel, x86, linux-arm-kernel, linux-riscv, linux-s390,
sparclinux, linux-perf-users, llvm
There is some additional testing information that needs to be
supplemented:
1.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 03:09:04 +0800, Xie Yuanbin Wrote:
> 2. Testing config:
> x86-64: `make x86_64_defconfig` first, then menuconfig setting:
> CONFIG_HZ=100
> CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY=n
> CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU=n
> CONFIG_EXPERT=y
> CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL=n
> CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NVME=y (just for boot)
>
> arm64: `make defconfig` first, then menuconfig setting:
> CONFIG_KVM=n
> CONFIG_HZ=100
> CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK=y
>
> arm32: `make multi_v7_defconfig` first, then menuconfig setting:
> CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS_TYPICAL=n
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM=n
The above is the config for performance test, when testing for size, the
config is: `make x86_64_defconfig` first, then menuconfig setting:
CONFIG_SCHED_CORE=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y (optional)
Enable CONFIG_SCHED_CORE and CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL to test the modified code.
2. When testing with Raspberry Pi 3b, in order to make the test result
stable, the CPU frequency should be fixed. In detail, setting in
config.txt:
```config.txt
arm_boost=0
core_freq_fixed=1
arm_freq=1200
gpu_freq=250
sdram_freq=400
arm_freq_min=1200
gpu_freq_min=250
sdram_freq_min=400
```
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread