public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v6 13/22] perf/x86: Enable XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields
Date: Mon,  9 Feb 2026 15:20:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260209072047.2180332-14-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260209072047.2180332-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

This patch adds support for sampling XMM registers using the
sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields.

When sample_simd_regs_enabled is set, the original XMM space in the
sample_regs_* field is treated as reserved. An INVAL error will be
reported to user space if any bit is set in the original XMM space while
sample_simd_regs_enabled is set.

The perf_reg_value function requires ABI information to understand the
layout of sample_regs. To accommodate this, a new abi field is introduced
in the struct x86_perf_regs to represent ABI information.

Additionally, the X86-specific perf_simd_reg_value function is implemented
to retrieve the XMM register values.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---

V6: Remove some unnecessary marcos from perf_regs.h but not all. For the
marcos like PERF_X86_SIMD_*_REGS and PERF_X86_*_QWORDS, they are still
needed by both kernel and perf-tools and perf_regs.h seems to be the
best place to define them.

 arch/x86/events/core.c                | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c            |  2 +-
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h          | 12 ++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h     |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 12 ++++
 arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c           | 51 ++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 36b4bc413938..bd47127fb84d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -704,6 +704,22 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 		if (event_has_extended_regs(event)) {
 			if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS))
 				return -EINVAL;
+			if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled)
+				return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (event_has_simd_regs(event)) {
+			if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			/* Not require any vector registers but set width */
+			if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords &&
+			    !event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_intr &&
+			    !event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_user)
+				return -EINVAL;
+			/* The vector registers set is not supported */
+			if (event_needs_xmm(event) &&
+			    !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE))
+				return -EINVAL;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1749,6 +1765,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_sample_data *data,
 	struct x86_perf_regs *x86_regs_user = this_cpu_ptr(&x86_user_regs);
 	struct perf_regs regs_user;
 
+	x86_regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE;
 	perf_get_regs_user(&regs_user, regs);
 	data->regs_user.abi = regs_user.abi;
 	if (regs_user.regs) {
@@ -1758,12 +1775,26 @@ static void x86_pmu_perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_sample_data *data,
 		data->regs_user.regs = NULL;
 }
 
+static inline void
+x86_pmu_update_ext_regs_size(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
+			     struct perf_sample_data *data,
+			     struct pt_regs *regs,
+			     u64 mask, u64 pred_mask)
+{
+	u16 pred_qwords = attr->sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords;
+	u16 vec_qwords = attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords;
+
+	data->dyn_size += (hweight64(mask) * vec_qwords +
+			   hweight64(pred_mask) * pred_qwords) * sizeof(u64);
+}
+
 static void x86_pmu_setup_basic_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
 					  struct perf_sample_data *data,
 					  struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
 	u64 sample_type = attr->sample_type;
+	struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs;
 
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
 		if (user_mode(regs)) {
@@ -1783,8 +1814,13 @@ static void x86_pmu_setup_basic_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
 			data->regs_user.regs = NULL;
 		}
 		data->dyn_size += sizeof(u64);
-		if (data->regs_user.regs)
-			data->dyn_size += hweight64(attr->sample_regs_user) * sizeof(u64);
+		if (data->regs_user.regs) {
+			data->dyn_size +=
+				hweight64(attr->sample_regs_user) * sizeof(u64);
+			perf_regs = container_of(data->regs_user.regs,
+						 struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+			perf_regs->abi = data->regs_user.abi;
+		}
 		data->sample_flags |= PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER;
 	}
 
@@ -1792,8 +1828,13 @@ static void x86_pmu_setup_basic_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
 		data->regs_intr.regs = regs;
 		data->regs_intr.abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
 		data->dyn_size += sizeof(u64);
-		if (data->regs_intr.regs)
-			data->dyn_size += hweight64(attr->sample_regs_intr) * sizeof(u64);
+		if (data->regs_intr.regs) {
+			data->dyn_size +=
+				hweight64(attr->sample_regs_intr) * sizeof(u64);
+			perf_regs = container_of(data->regs_intr.regs,
+						 struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+			perf_regs->abi = data->regs_intr.abi;
+		}
 		data->sample_flags |= PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR;
 	}
 }
@@ -1885,7 +1926,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_sample_extended_regs(struct perf_event *event,
 
 	perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
 
-	if (event_has_extended_regs(event))
+	if (event_needs_xmm(event))
 		mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_SSE;
 
 	mask &= x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask;
@@ -1909,6 +1950,44 @@ static void x86_pmu_sample_extended_regs(struct perf_event *event,
 		x86_pmu_update_ext_regs(perf_regs, xsave, intr_mask);
 }
 
+static void x86_pmu_setup_extended_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
+					     struct perf_sample_data *data,
+					     struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
+	u64 sample_type = attr->sample_type;
+	struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs;
+
+	if (!attr->sample_simd_regs_enabled)
+		return;
+
+	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER && data->regs_user.abi) {
+		perf_regs = container_of(data->regs_user.regs,
+					 struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+		perf_regs->abi |= PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD;
+
+		/* num and qwords of vector and pred registers */
+		data->dyn_size += sizeof(u64);
+		data->regs_user.abi |= PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD;
+		x86_pmu_update_ext_regs_size(attr, data, data->regs_user.regs,
+					     attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_user,
+					     attr->sample_simd_pred_reg_user);
+	}
+
+	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR && data->regs_intr.abi) {
+		perf_regs = container_of(data->regs_intr.regs,
+					 struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+		perf_regs->abi |= PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD;
+
+		/* num and qwords of vector and pred registers */
+		data->dyn_size += sizeof(u64);
+		data->regs_intr.abi |= PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD;
+		x86_pmu_update_ext_regs_size(attr, data, data->regs_intr.regs,
+					     attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_intr,
+					     attr->sample_simd_pred_reg_intr);
+	}
+}
+
 void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
 			     struct perf_sample_data *data,
 			     struct pt_regs *regs,
@@ -1920,6 +1999,7 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
 	 * which may be unnecessary to sample again.
 	 */
 	x86_pmu_sample_extended_regs(event, data, regs, ignore_mask);
+	x86_pmu_setup_extended_regs_data(event, data, regs);
 }
 
 int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 229dbe368b65..272725d749df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ static u64 pebs_update_adaptive_cfg(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (gprs || (attr->precise_ip < 2) || tsx_weight)
 		pebs_data_cfg |= PEBS_DATACFG_GP;
 
-	if (event_has_extended_regs(event))
+	if (event_needs_xmm(event))
 		pebs_data_cfg |= PEBS_DATACFG_XMMS;
 
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index a32ee4f0c891..02eea137e261 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -137,6 +137,18 @@ static inline bool is_acr_event_group(struct perf_event *event)
 	return check_leader_group(event->group_leader, PERF_X86_EVENT_ACR);
 }
 
+static inline bool event_needs_xmm(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled &&
+	    event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS)
+		return true;
+
+	if (!event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled &&
+	    event_has_extended_regs(event))
+		return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 struct amd_nb {
 	int nb_id;  /* NorthBridge id */
 	int refcnt; /* reference count */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 7baa1b0f889f..1f172740916c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -709,6 +709,7 @@ extern void perf_events_lapic_init(void);
 struct pt_regs;
 struct x86_perf_regs {
 	struct pt_regs	regs;
+	u64		abi;
 	union {
 		u64	*xmm_regs;
 		u32	*xmm_space;	/* for xsaves */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 7c9d2bb3833b..342b08448138 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -55,4 +55,16 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
 
 #define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK	(~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_XMM0) - 1))
 
+enum {
+	PERF_X86_SIMD_XMM_REGS      = 16,
+	PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX  = PERF_X86_SIMD_XMM_REGS,
+};
+
+#define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
+
+enum {
+	PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS      = 2,
+	PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX = PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS,
+};
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 81204cb7f723..9947a6b5c260 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
 
 	if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
 		perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+		/* SIMD registers are moved to dedicated sample_simd_vec_reg */
+		if (perf_regs->abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD)
+			return 0;
 		if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
 			return 0;
 		return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
@@ -74,6 +77,51 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
 	return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
 }
 
+u64 perf_simd_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx,
+			u16 qwords_idx, bool pred)
+{
+	struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs =
+			container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+
+	if (pred)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX ||
+			 qwords_idx >= PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (qwords_idx < PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS) {
+		if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
+			return 0;
+		return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx * PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS +
+					   qwords_idx];
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
+			   u16 pred_qwords, u32 pred_mask)
+{
+	/* pred_qwords implies sample_simd_{pred,vec}_reg_* are supported */
+	if (!pred_qwords)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!vec_qwords) {
+		if (vec_mask)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		if (vec_mask & ~PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (pred_mask)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #define PERF_REG_X86_RESERVED	(((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_XMM0) - 1) & \
 				 ~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_MAX) - 1))
 
@@ -108,7 +156,8 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
 
 int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
 {
-	if (!mask || (mask & (REG_NOSUPPORT | PERF_REG_X86_RESERVED)))
+	/* The mask could be 0 if only the SIMD registers are interested */
+	if (mask & (REG_NOSUPPORT | PERF_REG_X86_RESERVED))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-09  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-09  7:20 [Patch v6 00/22] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 01/22] perf/x86/intel: Restrict PEBS_ENABLE writes to PEBS-capable counters Dapeng Mi
2026-02-10 15:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-11  5:47     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 02/22] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 03/22] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 04/22] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific functions definations Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 05/22] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler Dapeng Mi
2026-02-10 18:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-11  6:26     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 06/22] perf/x86: Introduce x86-specific x86_pmu_setup_regs_data() Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 07/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 08/22] x86/fpu: Ensure TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set after saving FPU state Dapeng Mi
2026-02-11 19:39   ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-11 19:55     ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-24  6:50       ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-25 13:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24  5:35     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-24 19:13       ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-25  0:35         ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 09/22] perf: Move and rename has_extended_regs() for ARCH-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 10/22] perf/x86: Enable XMM Register Sampling for Non-PEBS Events Dapeng Mi
2026-02-15 23:58   ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-24  7:11     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-24 19:13       ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-25  0:55         ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-25  1:11           ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-25  1:36             ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-25  3:14               ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-25  6:13                 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 11/22] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 12/22] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-02-10 20:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-11  6:56     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09  7:20 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 14/22] perf/x86: Enable YMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 15/22] perf/x86: Enable ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 16/22] perf/x86: Enable OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 17/22] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 18/22] perf/x86: Enable eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 19/22] perf/x86: Enable SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 20/22] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 21/22] perf/x86/intel: Enable arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  7:20 ` [Patch v6 22/22] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09  8:48 ` [Patch v6 00/22] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260209072047.2180332-14-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox