public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v7 23/24] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:41:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324004118.3772171-24-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324004118.3772171-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

When two or more identical PEBS events with the same sampling period are
programmed on a mix of PDIST and non-PDIST counters, multiple
back-to-back NMIs can be triggered.

The Linux PMI handler processes the first NMI and clears the
GLOBAL_STATUS MSR. If a second NMI is triggered immediately after
the first, it is recognized as a "suspicious NMI" because no bits are set
in the GLOBAL_STATUS MSR (cleared by the first NMI).

This issue does not lead to PEBS data corruption or data loss, but it
does result in an annoying warning message.

The current NMI handler supports back-to-back NMI detection, but it
requires the PMI handler to return the count of actually processed events,
which the PEBS handler does not currently do.

This patch modifies the PEBS handlers to return the count of actually
processed events, thereby activating back-to-back NMI detection and
avoiding the "suspicious NMI" warning.

Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c |  6 ++----
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c   | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index e0dd57906bca..9da0a1354045 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3558,9 +3558,8 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
 	if (__test_and_clear_bit(GLOBAL_STATUS_BUFFER_OVF_BIT, (unsigned long *)&status)) {
 		u64 pebs_enabled = cpuc->pebs_enabled;
 
-		handled++;
 		x86_pmu_handle_guest_pebs(regs, &data);
-		static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data);
+		handled += static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data);
 
 		/*
 		 * PMI throttle may be triggered, which stops the PEBS event.
@@ -3587,8 +3586,7 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
 	 */
 	if (__test_and_clear_bit(GLOBAL_STATUS_ARCH_PEBS_THRESHOLD_BIT,
 				 (unsigned long *)&status)) {
-		handled++;
-		static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data);
+		handled += static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data);
 
 		if (cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS] &&
 		    is_pebs_counter_event_group(cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS]))
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 4743bdfb4ed4..6e1c516122c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ __intel_pmu_pebs_events(struct perf_event *event,
 	__intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(event, iregs, regs, data, at, count, setup_sample);
 }
 
-static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_data *data)
+static int intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_data *data)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 	struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
@@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_
 	int n;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	at  = (struct pebs_record_core *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
 	top = (struct pebs_record_core *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
@@ -3055,22 +3055,24 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_
 	ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
 
 	if (!test_bit(0, cpuc->active_mask))
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!event);
 
 	if (!event->attr.precise_ip)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	n = top - at;
 	if (n <= 0) {
 		if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
 			intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload(event, 0);
-		return;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	__intel_pmu_pebs_events(event, iregs, data, at, top, 0, n,
 				setup_pebs_fixed_sample_data);
+
+	return 1; /* PMC0 only*/
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, u64 mask)
@@ -3093,7 +3095,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, u64
 	}
 }
 
-static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_data *data)
+static int intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_data *data)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 	struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
@@ -3102,11 +3104,12 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
 	short counts[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + MAX_FIXED_PEBS_EVENTS] = {};
 	short error[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + MAX_FIXED_PEBS_EVENTS] = {};
 	int max_pebs_events = intel_pmu_max_num_pebs(NULL);
+	u64 events_bitmap = 0;
 	int bit, i, size;
 	u64 mask;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	base = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
 	top = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
@@ -3122,7 +3125,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
 
 	if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
 		intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, mask);
-		return;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	for (at = base; at < top; at += x86_pmu.pebs_record_size) {
@@ -3186,6 +3189,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
 		if ((counts[bit] == 0) && (error[bit] == 0))
 			continue;
 
+		events_bitmap |= bit;
 		event = cpuc->events[bit];
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!event))
 			continue;
@@ -3207,6 +3211,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
 						setup_pebs_fixed_sample_data);
 		}
 	}
+
+	return hweight64(events_bitmap);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void
@@ -3262,7 +3268,7 @@ __intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct x86_perf_regs, x86_pebs_regs);
 
-static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_data *data)
+static int intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_data *data)
 {
 	short counts[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + MAX_FIXED_PEBS_EVENTS] = {};
 	void *last[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + MAX_FIXED_PEBS_EVENTS];
@@ -3272,10 +3278,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
 	struct pt_regs *regs = &perf_regs->regs;
 	struct pebs_basic *basic;
 	void *base, *at, *top;
+	u64 events_bitmap = 0;
 	u64 mask;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	base = (struct pebs_basic *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
 	top = (struct pebs_basic *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
@@ -3288,7 +3295,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
 
 	if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
 		intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, mask);
-		return;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	if (!iregs)
@@ -3303,6 +3310,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
 			continue;
 
 		pebs_status = mask & basic->applicable_counters;
+		events_bitmap |= pebs_status;
 		__intel_pmu_handle_pebs_record(iregs, regs, data, at,
 					       pebs_status, counts, last,
 					       setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data);
@@ -3310,9 +3318,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
 
 	__intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(iregs, regs, data, mask, counts, last,
 					    setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data);
+
+	return hweight64(events_bitmap);
 }
 
-static void intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs(struct pt_regs *iregs,
+static int intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 				      struct perf_sample_data *data)
 {
 	short counts[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + MAX_FIXED_PEBS_EVENTS] = {};
@@ -3322,13 +3332,14 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 	struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs = this_cpu_ptr(&x86_pebs_regs);
 	struct pt_regs *regs = &perf_regs->regs;
 	void *base, *at, *top;
+	u64 events_bitmap = 0;
 	u64 mask;
 
 	rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PEBS_INDEX, index.whole);
 
 	if (unlikely(!index.wr)) {
 		intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
-		return;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	base = cpuc->pebs_vaddr;
@@ -3367,6 +3378,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 
 		basic = at + sizeof(struct arch_pebs_header);
 		pebs_status = mask & basic->applicable_counters;
+		events_bitmap |= pebs_status;
 		__intel_pmu_handle_pebs_record(iregs, regs, data, at,
 					       pebs_status, counts, last,
 					       setup_arch_pebs_sample_data);
@@ -3386,6 +3398,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 	__intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(iregs, regs, data, mask,
 					    counts, last,
 					    setup_arch_pebs_sample_data);
+
+	return hweight64(events_bitmap);
 }
 
 static void __init intel_arch_pebs_init(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 36688d28407f..e6bf786728eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	int		pebs_record_size;
 	int		pebs_buffer_size;
 	u64		pebs_events_mask;
-	void		(*drain_pebs)(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_sample_data *data);
+	int		(*drain_pebs)(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_sample_data *data);
 	struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints;
 	void		(*pebs_aliases)(struct perf_event *event);
 	u64		(*pebs_latency_data)(struct perf_event *event, u64 status);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-24  0:40 [Patch v7 00/24] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:40 ` [Patch v7 01/24] perf/x86: Move hybrid PMU initialization before x86_pmu_starting_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:40 ` [Patch v7 02/24] perf/x86/intel: Avoid PEBS event on fixed counters without extended PEBS Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:40 ` [Patch v7 03/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:40 ` [Patch v7 04/24] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:40 ` [Patch v7 05/24] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific functions definations Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 06/24] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 07/24] perf/x86: Introduce x86-specific x86_pmu_setup_regs_data() Dapeng Mi
2026-03-25  5:18   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 08/24] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 09/24] x86/fpu: Ensure TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set after saving FPU state Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 10/24] perf: Move and rename has_extended_regs() for ARCH-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 11/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM Register Sampling for Non-PEBS Events Dapeng Mi
2026-03-25  7:30   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 12/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-03-25  7:58   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 13/24] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-03-25  8:44   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 14/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-03-25  9:01   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 15/24] perf/x86: Enable YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 16/24] perf/x86: Enable ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 17/24] perf/x86: Enable OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 18/24] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 19/24] perf/x86: Enable eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 20/24] perf/x86: Enable SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-03-25  9:25   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 21/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 22/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  0:41 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-03-24  0:41 ` [Patch v7 24/24] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size Dapeng Mi
2026-03-24  1:08 ` [Patch v7 00/24] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-25  9:41 ` Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260324004118.3772171-24-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox