public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf header: Do validation of perf.data HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 18:28:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408182850.DC446C2BC9E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408173203.96700-7-acme@kernel.org>

Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] Lack of validation for `nr_domains` causes out-of-bounds reads and arbitrary frees during the cleanup path.
--

commit 0f6144cf61c4816d686ec4a1fe5d43fdc14b7669
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf header: Do validation of perf.data HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO

This commit adds bounds checking for cpu and domain indices read from
a perf.data file's HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO section. It ensures these
values do not exceed nr_cpus_avail and max_sched_domains respectively.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -3736,6 +3741,12 @@ static int process_cpu_domain_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused
>  		cd_map[cpu]->cpu = cpu;
>  
>  		if (do_read_u32(ff, &nr_domains))
>  			return -1;
>  
>  		cd_map[cpu]->nr_domains = nr_domains;
>  
>  		cd_map[cpu]->domains = zalloc(sizeof(*d_info) * max_sched_domains);
>  		if (!cd_map[cpu]->domains)
>  			return -1;

Could there still be an issue with an unvalidated nr_domains value?

If a malformed file provides an nr_domains value much larger than
max_sched_domains, the loop below will eventually fail and return -1.

This triggers session teardown and calls free_cpu_domain_info(), which
iterates up to cd_map[i]->nr_domains and accesses cd_map[i]->domains[j].

Since the array size is only max_sched_domains, could this cause an
out-of-bounds read on the heap? If the out-of-bounds data is non-zero,
would it be treated as a pointer to struct domain_info and passed to
zfree(), causing arbitrary frees?

Also, if the domains array allocation fails here, cd_map[cpu]->domains is
NULL. Would the cleanup loop then blindly dereference a NULL pointer while
trying to access cd_map[i]->domains[j]?

>  
>  		for (j = 0; j < nr_domains; j++) {
>  			if (do_read_u32(ff, &domain))
>  				return -1;
>  
> +			if (domain >= max_sched_domains) {
> +				pr_err("Invalid HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO: domain %d >= max_sched_domains (%d)\n",
> +				       domain, max_sched_domains);
> +				return -1;
> +			}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260408173203.96700-1-acme@kernel.org?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-08 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-08 17:31 [PATCHES perf-tools-next v6 0/8] Cleanups and fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf symbols: Make variable receiving result strrchr() const Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf util: Kill die() prototype, dead for a long time Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf tools: Make more global variables static Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf bench: Constify tables Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 17:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf header: Use a max number of command line args Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 18:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-08 17:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf header: Do validation of perf.data HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 18:28   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-08 17:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf tools: Use calloc() where applicable Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 18:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-08 17:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Replace basename() calls with perf_basename() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-08 17:28 [PATCHES perf-tools-next v5 0/7] Cleanups and fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 17:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf header: Do validation of perf.data HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-08 18:38   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260408182850.DC446C2BC9E@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox