From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E06AA3876B3; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775722332; cv=none; b=NBalgb5dxwOGG2AcGTh7YPDKQlN00dVmthwjKNFORhejV3grL7XM0CC4VNuoIzp1qlVxUQ4iksjpSECFNy06/RMD5lvBCnyksTDZkHGxO1gxAENtdzim48ULb1AYX6irgIug8A50B25piH4se8GwsesV02f2JsWuWQYxqBrIFFs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775722332; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Pewli9JUBSraANg6axJRtKfvam44lJTWp3pyptw7rmo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=gbwY8u9aguIbKBUP2FAepXccXEvJM9jgeubjsGks3iHHHk5MQ1H3aj8wRegKp7YWewEC4pwOSLU3NiBzn5oP4NSGZuK7IOOVXPyKR5BlMpeS3AsDecrBNoBJBTVjHGRZg7iwRy+e3kD5jM+AwiUKSrXiRgc/6xhp3ziR2QHUUfA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=te0uBRyW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="te0uBRyW" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353729.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 638JaWNw2316280; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:12:08 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:message-id:mime-version :subject:to; s=pp1; bh=2T4MZ9LdtcX40D0UpT4e1bVO5bldl3j+qM05NI1/n SY=; b=te0uBRyW1l6hwzaAuuICIUJbgMVeJjn38eerBI8KSBPQLeLgIF8qGdCE5 JwygM4NlyOqkW3Q4jEhe3SrnxCM6zRb2XcspPapN2fjiIOhd9tyam0HAyJyjVB5t zzL6OrYTIQDBb1MN2Qz8giNuDbUesSvWI4J5DyjpqWyINEi97rVxMlvy0BA7KcYA Pd94s3YQZQqElGiV7Ku0Aquj2bp/1dp7GzuUG0pSC58k29UQWUktO9yyTy2sWW1i JbZimCJ9W1GV5c3ePdrPTjG+ybsvqKrjEKbPzikUwYduj6QyMk0Zc4AcimkBonoS 9HpIy99g1JIFQ846KYmM+9x+Pp8RQ== Received: from ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (db.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.219]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4dcn2g3y3d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:12:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 6397jfLE014348; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:12:07 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4dcmg4ts1q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:12:07 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 6398C3ka45744536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:12:03 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1E72004B; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:12:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F392B20043; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:12:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.87.85.9]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:12:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Thomas Richter To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, howardchu95@gmail.com Cc: agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, japo@linux.ibm.com, Thomas Richter Subject: [PATCH] perf test: Make perf trace enum augmentation tests exclusive Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 10:11:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20260409081154.318898-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Reinject: loops=2 maxloops=12 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=FKArAeos c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=69d75f58 cx=c_pps a=aDMHemPKRhS1OARIsFnwRA==:117 a=aDMHemPKRhS1OARIsFnwRA==:17 a=A5OVakUREuEA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=RnoormkPH1_aCDwRdu11:22 a=uAbxVGIbfxUO_5tXvNgY:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=cv1OQbefsp_F3cgJjgUA:9 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: YKUN_5CYlh-WRnIGxrs_MHz_6gvrcOUk X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwNDA5MDA2OCBTYWx0ZWRfX8hiGUbzJcLII gA6+/BMU9Cf5MJ45vgWj3T/W5voKodQfbFIPKnBttD0lGWfGDBNQGbJsog3ilAJpm3xYaYSQaws WESQdxSHloj96xlnKA89yrwdZT/jGbLtJV+DJn9JvLgeA/n9pGr9YX7wOhopvdaU8jX/AzzWTZD JpC8gBSwnSjeJ7/lyY3+wXflmESeUQRvtyzOGUsvpm4BqE5TUXjU5JVa08E1GCk8noaP6ePMFeo BrJ95RZyTp1+RoQQjcpYuOSMwZ7NpGcedbIdqd7+CynOAE7MDA9/OXFBAcVbqPvVcZK+69eDa70 6nUJbLsrwB/gFmBQpaE3FxaVrTCP6KYa4qEJoqvL9YwNiwFO+bPVo1JN83kNJSBeVR62wyiekZZ Zhju7yuhV5q0aN7GUrlPCGT09EknmMWYN6YXgdBWPsJKnP2cSOSolqow+jojkCc9o15HwcHr/LC dvBnmn80vt7AsO52Zzg== X-Proofpoint-GUID: 2w0MDK0pVYGuojxeMDRlkVouijeh7n6Z X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1143,Hydra:6.1.51,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-04-09_02,2026-04-08_01,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2604010000 definitions=main-2604090068 Running both tests cases 'perf trace enum augmentation tests' and 'perf trace BTF general tests' together causes the first test case to fail: # for i in $(seq 5); do \ ./perf test 'perf trace enum augmentation tests' \ 'perf trace BTF general tests'; \ done 125: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 126: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! 125: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 126: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! 125: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 126: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! 125: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 126: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! 125: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 126: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! # Test case perf trace enum augmentation tests' fails because the second test case 'perf trace BTF general tests' runs concurrently as can be observed using a ps -ef | grep perf output list on a different window. Both do a perf trace command concurrently. Make test case 'perf trace enum augmentation tests' exclusive. # for i in $(seq 5); do \ ./perf test 'perf trace enum augmentation tests' \ 'perf trace BTF general tests'; \ done 125: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 155: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 125: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 155: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 125: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 155: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 125: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 155: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok 125: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 155: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok # Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter Cc: Howard Chu --- tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_enum.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_enum.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_enum.sh index 03e9f680a4a6..437510d46f58 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_enum.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_enum.sh @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #!/bin/bash -# perf trace enum augmentation tests +# perf trace enum augmentation tests (exclusive) # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 err=0 -- 2.53.0