From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf header: Sanity check HEADER_EVENT_DESC
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:20:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414222053.64651C19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414204847.293557-4-acme@kernel.org>
Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s):
- [Critical] The patch rejects `sz == 0` but fails to enforce a minimum safe length for `sz`, leading to a critical heap buffer overflow during attribute byte-swapping. This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the patch's attempt to sanitize `sz` is incomplete.
- [Critical] The newly added bounds check for `nre` can be trivially bypassed, allowing a 32-bit integer overflow when allocating the `events` array that results in a massive heap out-of-bounds write. This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the patch completely fails to prevent it.
- [High] The newly added bounds check introduces a division-by-zero vulnerability on 32-bit architectures.
--
commit 49409abdc9adae8ec3fbd6033ac0123dfbe6b50b
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf header: Sanity check HEADER_EVENT_DESC
read_event_desc() reads nre, sz, and nr from the file and uses them to
control allocations and loops. This commit adds bounds checks to reject
sz == 0, sz exceeding section size, and checks that nre and nr fit in
the remaining section.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index f8acd06ae9235..696f19739074e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -2101,6 +2101,13 @@ static struct evsel *read_event_desc(struct feat_fd *ff)
> if (do_read_u32(ff, &sz))
> goto error;
>
> + /*
> + * The minimum section footprint per event is sz bytes for the attr
> + * plus a u32 for the id count, check that nre events fit.
> + */
> + if (sz == 0 || sz > ff->size || nre > (ff->size - ff->offset) / (sz + sizeof(u32)))
Could this regression cause a division by zero on 32-bit architectures?
Since sz is a 32-bit unsigned integer read directly from the file, if it is
set to 0xFFFFFFFC, sz + sizeof(u32) will overflow to 0 on 32-bit systems where
sizeof() evaluates to a 32-bit size_t. This would evaluate to:
(ff->size - ff->offset) / 0
Also, does this code allow a small sz value to cause an out-of-bounds access
later during byte-swapping?
If sz is set to a small value between 1 and 7 (e.g., 4), buf = malloc(sz) will
allocate a tiny chunk. If the file requires byte-swapping, the subsequent call
to perf_event__attr_swap() will unconditionally read attr->size (bytes 4-7).
This would read out of bounds and potentially use heap garbage to byte-swap
adjacent memory.
Finally, is ff->size validated against the actual physical file size before
this check?
If ff->size is an unvalidated value from the file header, this bounds check
can be bypassed with a huge value. If a file then sets nre to 0xFFFFFFFF,
it would cause the subsequent allocation to overflow to 0:
events = calloc(nre + 1, sizeof(*events));
This would return a valid minimal chunk, but the following loop:
for (i = 0, evsel = events; i < nre; evsel++, i++) {
evsel->core.idx = i;
...
would iterate 0xFFFFFFFF times, overwriting the heap array.
> + goto error;
> +
> /* buffer to hold on file attr struct */
> buf = malloc(sz);
> if (!buf)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260414204847.293557-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 20:48 [PATCHES 0/4] More perf.data header validation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-14 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf header: Add section bounds checking to the fd read path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-14 21:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-14 20:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf header: Validate string length before allocating in do_read_string() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-14 21:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-14 20:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf header: Sanity check HEADER_EVENT_DESC Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-14 22:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-14 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf header: Validate bitmap size before allocating in do_read_bitmap() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-14 22:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-16 8:24 ` [PATCHES 0/4] More perf.data header validation James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260414222053.64651C19425@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox