From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guangshuo Li" <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm_pmu: acpi: fix reference leak on failed device registration
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:31:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415183138.C64C7C19424@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415174159.3625777-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] Calling platform_device_put() on statically allocated platform devices triggers a kernel WARN.
--
commit 3d6b3748275060c9fa53f46ef32bdbc93f8522c7
Author: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
arm_pmu: acpi: fix reference leak on failed device registration
This commit attempts to fix a reference leak when platform_device_register()
fails in arm_acpi_register_pmu_device() by calling platform_device_put()
on the failed path.
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> index e80f76d95e68b..5ce382661e344 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -119,8 +119,10 @@ arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(struct platform_device *pdev, u8 len,
>
> pdev->resource[0].start = irq;
> ret = platform_device_register(pdev);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> acpi_unregister_gsi(gsi);
> + platform_device_put(pdev);
Does this cause a kernel warning when called on statically allocated platform
devices?
The arm_acpi_register_pmu_device() function is called with statically
allocated platform devices:
arm_spe_acpi_register_device()
arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(&spe_dev, ...)
arm_trbe_acpi_register_device()
arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(&trbe_dev, ...)
Because these devices are statically allocated and not created via
platform_device_alloc(), they do not have a .dev.release callback
configured.
When platform_device_put() drops the reference count to 0, the driver core's
device_release() function will see the missing release callback and trigger
a warning splat.
On systems with panic_on_warn enabled, could this turn a benign device
registration failure into a kernel panic?
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260415174159.3625777-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 17:41 [PATCH] arm_pmu: acpi: fix reference leak on failed device registration Guangshuo Li
2026-04-15 18:19 ` Mark Rutland
2026-04-16 4:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-16 6:34 ` Guangshuo Li
2026-04-16 7:23 ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-16 8:59 ` Guangshuo Li
2026-04-16 9:50 ` Mark Rutland
2026-04-16 9:30 ` Mark Rutland
2026-04-20 7:28 ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-20 8:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-15 18:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260415183138.C64C7C19424@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox