From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf build-id: Fix wrong return value checking
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:30:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421003005.38E7CC19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420180858.129075-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s):
- [High] Missing O_NONBLOCK during build-ID extraction enables indefinite hangs on FIFOs via TOCTOU race.
- [Medium] The strict length check rejects valid 16-byte build IDs (e.g., MD5/UUID), causing `perf buildid-list` to fail for them.
--
commit 7e5fc011b65e40f9f999c08196173059dcbc7f79
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
perf build-id: Fix wrong return value checking
This commit adjusts the return value checks of the build-id snprintf
functions to correctly account for the terminating NUL byte when comparing
lengths. This ensures perf buildid-list properly displays build IDs instead
of returning errors.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-buildid-list.c b/tools/perf/builtin-buildid-list.c
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-buildid-list.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-buildid-list.c
> @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ static int sysfs__fprintf_build_id(FILE *fp)
> char sbuild_id[SBUILD_ID_SIZE];
> int ret;
>
> ret = sysfs__snprintf_build_id("/", sbuild_id, sizeof(sbuild_id));
> - if (ret != sizeof(sbuild_id))
> + if (ret != sizeof(sbuild_id) - 1)
Could this strict length check reject valid 16-byte build IDs?
The kernel and perf subsystem natively support shorter 16-byte build IDs
like MD5 or UUID. For these, sysfs__snprintf_build_id() would correctly
return 32.
Since 32 does not equal sizeof(sbuild_id) - 1 (which evaluates to 40), will
this erroneously return -EINVAL and cause perf buildid-list to silently
ignore valid kernel maps and binaries?
> return ret < 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;
>
> return fprintf(fp, "%s\n", sbuild_id);
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ static int filename__fprintf_build_id(const char *name, FILE *fp)
> char sbuild_id[SBUILD_ID_SIZE];
> int ret;
>
> ret = filename__snprintf_build_id(name, sbuild_id, sizeof(sbuild_id));
Does the underlying build-ID extraction sequence miss an O_NONBLOCK flag,
potentially allowing indefinite hangs?
When filename__snprintf_build_id() processes user-supplied file paths, the
underlying open() call happens without O_NONBLOCK.
While there is an is_regular_file() check beforehand, could a time-of-check
to time-of-use race allow swapping the file with a FIFO or blocking device
immediately after the check, causing the tool to hang indefinitely?
> - if (ret != sizeof(sbuild_id))
> + if (ret != sizeof(sbuild_id) - 1)
> return ret < 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;
>
> return fprintf(fp, "%s\n", sbuild_id);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260420180858.129075-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 18:08 [PATCH] perf build-id: Fix wrong return value checking Namhyung Kim
2026-04-21 0:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-22 7:12 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-21 14:33 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260421003005.38E7CC19425@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox