From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jianping Liu" <frankljpliu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix NULL pointer dereference in loongarch_call__parse
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 05:54:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423055438.4599FC2BCB2@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423053102.3717015-1-frankljpliu@gmail.com>
Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [Medium] The fix correctly prevents a NULL pointer dereference, but improperly aborts instruction parsing by returning `-1`. This strips the `is_call` attribute and degrades `perf annotate` functionality, whereas it should bypass name extraction and resolve the target using the already extracted address.
--
commit 807b803f1f78132524dc6117283161821fab508a
Author: Jianping Liu <frankljpliu@gmail.com>
perf annotate: Fix NULL pointer dereference in loongarch_call__parse
This commit prevents a segmentation fault in loongarch_call__parse()
by adding a NULL check for the return value of strchr() when parsing
objdump output. It handles cases where a branch-and-link instruction
lacks a symbol name.
> Add a NULL check for the return value of strchr() before dereferencing
> it, consistent with s390_call__parse() which handles the same case
> correctly.
Does s390_call__parse() actually handle this correctly without regressions?
Returning -1 causes disasm_line__init_ins() to receive a negative return
value and set dl->ins.ops = NULL. This makes ins__is_call() evaluate to
false, meaning the instruction completely loses its call semantics in the TUI.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-loongarch.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-loongarch.c
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-loongarch.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-loongarch.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ static int loongarch_call__parse(const struct arch *arch, struct ins_operands *o
> ops->target.addr = strtoull(c, &endptr, 16);
>
> name = strchr(endptr, '<');
> + if (name == NULL)
> + return -1;
> +
> name++;
Could this code bypass the name extraction and proceed directly to symbol
resolution using the already extracted target address?
Since ops->target.addr is successfully parsed right above this check,
skipping the name parsing and returning 0 instead of aborting with -1 would
preserve the is_call attribute. This would allow the TUI to still draw
branch arrows and navigate the call.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260423053102.3717015-1-frankljpliu@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 5:31 [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix NULL pointer dereference in loongarch_call__parse Jianping Liu
2026-04-23 5:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260423055438.4599FC2BCB2@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=frankljpliu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox