From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] mm/damon: introduce perf event based access check
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 08:33:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260425153316.89358-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC5umyjcFm-iw31kgYP0Z61z7N=vMzkZKsvGZpYmNwNw3R_gHw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 21:33:07 +0900 Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2026年4月25日(土) 8:31 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>:
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:27:07 +0900 Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello SeongJae,
> > >
> > > 2026年4月23日(木) 13:34 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>:
[...]
> > > My current patch introduces a set of kernel ABIs (.../perf_events/<P>/*),
> > > and if I want to control another field in the perf_event_attr,
> > > I would have to add a new ABI. This would be a significant
> > > maintenance cost.
> > >
> > > Instead, I would like to provide a single bin file where the
> > > perf_event_attr I want to set is written as binary.
> >
> > I'd prefer having single file per parameter, as sysfs is designed for. It
> > allows keeping the input format simple and therefore easy to maintain and
> > extend. Of course, we should carefult at adding new parameters, though.
>
> Another idea from Namhyung Kim [1] is to fix the events
> specified by the CPU architecture being executed.
I think I need to study mroe about perf events :)
>
> Of course, we would want to control a limited number of
> parameters, such as sample_freq.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/damon/aZwLDAxf9eP0lPdD@z2/
>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - `sample freq`: A higher frequency improves access accuracy, but also
> > > > > increases overhead.
> > > > > - `sample phys addr`: specify 0 for vaddr and 1 for paddr.
> > > > > - The remaining type, config, config1, and config2 settings can be found
> > > > > as follows:
> > > >
> > > > The values look bit human-unfriendly. I wonder if we could use more
> > > > human-friendly values, e.g., 'cpu' for type,
> > > > 'mem_trans_retired.load_latency_gt_1024' for config, etc. Not necessarily we
> > > > need to fix this right now. Let's keep discussing.
> > >
> > > I'd like to do it that way. These processes can be handled better
> > > from user space than from within the kernel, so I'd like to achieve
> > > this from damo with the help of the perf tool and library.
> >
> > Does existing perf event ABI also take that approach? If so, I think that is
> > fine.
>
> On Intel CPUs, you can read the mem-loads and/or mem-stores
> files as follows to find the value that should be set to
> perf_event_attr:
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/mem-loads
> event=0xcd,umask=0x1,ldlat=3
>
> You can find out which bit field of which member of
> perf_event_attr should be used to set these values from the
> corresponding files in the format directory.
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/format/{event,umask,ldlat}
> config:0-7
> config:8-15
> config1:0-15
>
> This conversion from symbolic event name to values that should
> be set in perf_event_attr can be done, for example, as shown below,
> so I think it should be implemented using perf in some way.
>
> import perf
>
> if __name__ == '__main__':
> evlist = perf.parse_events("mem-loads")
> for evsel in evlist:
> print(f"{evsel}: type={evsel.type} config={evsel.config}")
I definitely need to study mroe about perf event. I will comment after I learn
some fundamentals. But I believe this is not a blocker of this work.
Thanks,
SJ
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-25 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 0:42 [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] mm/damon: introduce perf event based access check Akinobu Mita
2026-04-23 0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] mm/damon/core: add code borrowed from report-based monitoring work Akinobu Mita
2026-04-23 1:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] mm/damon/core: add common code for perf event based access check Akinobu Mita
2026-04-23 1:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] mm/damon/vaddr: support " Akinobu Mita
2026-04-23 2:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] mm/damon/paddr: " Akinobu Mita
2026-04-23 3:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 4:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] mm/damon: introduce " SeongJae Park
2026-04-24 3:27 ` Akinobu Mita
2026-04-24 23:31 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-25 12:33 ` Akinobu Mita
2026-04-25 15:33 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260425153316.89358-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox