From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fredrik Markstrom" <fredrik.markstrom@est.tech>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] DO NOT MERGE: selftests: perf_events: Add device memory callchain unwinding test
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:53:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260429025357.BD2B2C2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428-master-with-pfix-v3-v1-3-c384d3e53092@est.tech>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Insecure temporary file usage in /tmp creates a privilege escalation or file overwrite vector
- [Medium] Test silently reports a false positive on initialization or perf execution failures
- [Medium] Hardcoded 4KB page alignment breaks on arm64 systems with 16KB or 64KB pages
- [Low] Uninitialized wait status variable `pst` can lead to undefined behavior
- [Low] File descriptor for `/dev/mem` is leaked to the `perf` child process
--
commit 72f5293ddcb8999284919045e0f80f532368b0f1
Author: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@est.tech>
DO NOT MERGE: selftests: perf_events: Add device memory callchain unwinding test
This commit adds a regression test for device memory callchain unwinding by
mapping an MMIO address via /dev/mem and sampling the process with perf.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/test_perf_vmio.c b/tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/test_perf_vmio.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..780c5800dd6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/test_perf_vmio.c
[ ... ]
> + env = getenv("MMIO_ADDR");
> + if (env)
> + pa = strtoul(env, NULL, 16);
> +
> + page = pa & ~0xFFFUL;
> + off = pa - page;
Is it possible for this to break on arm64 systems configured with 16KB or
64KB pages? The bitwise mask assumes a 4KB page size. Could this be changed
to use sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) instead?
> +
> + fd = open("/dev/mem", O_RDWR | O_SYNC);
Does this leak the file descriptor to the perf child process? It is opened
without O_CLOEXEC, so the fd remains open across the execvp() call for perf.
> + if (fd < 0)
> + SKIP(return, "cannot open /dev/mem");
> +
> + /* Fork a spinner child with FP pointing into device memory */
> + spin_pid = fork();
> + ASSERT_GE(spin_pid, 0);
> + if (spin_pid == 0) {
> + /*
> + * mmap /dev/mem in the child so remap_pfn_range populates
> + * PTEs directly. fork() does not copy PTEs for VM_PFNMAP
> + * regions, so mapping before fork leaves the child with
> + * empty page tables — the unwinder would get a translation
> + * fault instead of a synchronous external abort.
> + */
> + m = mmap(NULL, off + 4096, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_SHARED, fd, page);
> + if (m == MAP_FAILED)
> + _exit(1);
If the child process fails to mmap /dev/mem here (for instance, due to
CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM or an unaligned offset), it immediately exits.
Because the parent does not verify the child's status before running perf,
perf will attempt to attach to a dead process and fail with a status other
than 1. The test then incorrectly passes. Can we verify the child process
is alive before running perf, or check its exit status?
[ ... ]
> + if (perf_pid == 0) {
> + char *const perf_argv[] = {
> + "perf", "record", "-g", "--call-graph", "fp",
> + "-p", pid_str, "--", "sleep", "3", NULL
> + };
> +
> + if (chdir("/tmp"))
> + _exit(1);
> + execvp(perf_argv[0], perf_argv);
Could this overwrite unintended files by running a root-privileged perf
record in the world-writable /tmp directory without specifying an output
file?
perf record defaults to writing to perf.data in the current directory.
An unprivileged user could pre-create a symlink at /tmp/perf.data pointing
to a sensitive file.
Could the test use mkdtemp() to create a secure directory, or pipe the
output instead?
> + _exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + waitpid(perf_pid, &pst, 0);
Could pst be left uninitialized if waitpid() fails and returns an error
(such as -1 from being interrupted by a signal)?
This would cause the subsequent WIFEXITED(pst) and WEXITSTATUS(pst) macros
to read uninitialized memory. Can we initialize pst to 0 or check the
waitpid() return value?
> +
> + kill(spin_pid, SIGKILL);
> + waitpid(spin_pid, NULL, 0);
> + close(fd);
> +
> + if (WIFEXITED(pst) && WEXITSTATUS(pst) == 1)
> + SKIP(return, "perf not available");
> +
> + /*
> + * The real test is that the kernel survived. If we got here
> + * without a synchronous external abort, the guard worked.
> + */
> + TH_LOG("kernel survived perf sampling with FP in device memory");
> +#endif /* __aarch64__ */
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260428-master-with-pfix-v3-v1-0-c384d3e53092@est.tech?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 20:48 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: perf: Skip device memory during user callchain unwinding Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-28 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-29 2:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-28 20:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] DO NOT MERGE: arm64: perf: Add skip_vmio parameter to control device memory callchain guard Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-29 2:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-28 20:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] DO NOT MERGE: selftests: perf_events: Add device memory callchain unwinding test Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-29 2:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260429025357.BD2B2C2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=fredrik.markstrom@est.tech \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox