From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fredrik Markstrom" <fredrik.markstrom@est.tech>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] DO NOT MERGE: arm64: perf: Add skip_vmio parameter to control device memory callchain guard
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:55:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430115536.1189DC2BCC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430-master-with-pfix-v3-v2-2-bd526ec04a75@est.tech>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The commit is explicitly marked 'DO NOT MERGE' and introduces a module parameter to bypass a safety guard, intentionally triggering a kernel panic.
--
commit 955a332efd3c97ad086c64a2f8f7a0cd30dbaea7
Author: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@est.tech>
DO NOT MERGE: arm64: perf: Add skip_vmio parameter to control device memory callchain guard
This commit introduces a module parameter to dynamically disable the device
memory guard during user callchain unwinding. Disabling this guard allows
perf to follow frame pointers into device memory, intentionally triggering a
synchronous external abort and kernel panic on arm64 for testing purposes.
> DO NOT MERGE: arm64: perf: Add skip_vmio parameter to control device memory callchain guard
Should this patch be dropped from the queue, given the subject is explicitly
marked "DO NOT MERGE"?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 4a28df9bbe763..19b5251f214f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -123,6 +124,10 @@ static bool range_is_device_mem(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static bool skip_vmio = true;
> +module_param_unsafe(skip_vmio, bool, 0600);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(skip_vmio, "Skip device memory during user callchain unwinding");
> +
Is it intended to merge this debug module parameter into the mainline kernel?
The commit message notes that disabling this guard intentionally triggers a
synchronous external abort and kernel panic.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260430-master-with-pfix-v3-v2-0-bd526ec04a75@est.tech?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 10:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: perf: Skip device memory during user callchain unwinding Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-30 11:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-01 9:54 ` Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] DO NOT MERGE: arm64: perf: Add skip_vmio parameter to control device memory callchain guard Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-30 11:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] DO NOT MERGE: selftests: perf_events: Add device memory callchain unwinding test Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-30 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430115536.1189DC2BCC4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=fredrik.markstrom@est.tech \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox