From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ravi Bangoria" <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] perf amd ibs: Suppress bogus TlbRefillLat and DCPhysAd on Zen4+
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 18:20:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508182027.F2DF1C2BCC7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508060004.2575-5-ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The patch uses a value-based heuristic to suppress the output of IbsDCPhysAd if it is zero, which incorrectly hides valid memory accesses to physical address 0x0.
--
commit a0f442c06429e0cbb710a06da2ee24b2a327f365
Author: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
perf amd ibs: Suppress bogus TlbRefillLat and DCPhysAd on Zen4+
This commit updates the decoding of IBS MSRs on Zen4+ to add validity
checks for TlbRefillLat and DCPhysAd. It also attempts to avoid printing
zeroed physical addresses that the kernel sanitizes for unprivileged users.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c b/tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c
> index b084dee76b1a7..385308c55f347 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -253,8 +260,12 @@ static void amd_dump_ibs_op(struct perf_sample *sample)
> pr_ibs_op_data3(*op_data3);
> if (op_data3->dc_lin_addr_valid)
> printf("IbsDCLinAd:\t%016llx\n", *(rip + 4));
> - if (op_data3->dc_phy_addr_valid)
> +
> + /* Use !zen4_ibs_extensions as a proxy for Zen3 and earlier */
> + if (op_data3->dc_phy_addr_valid && *(rip + 5) &&
> + (!zen4_ibs_extensions || op_data3->dc_lin_addr_valid)) {
> printf("IbsDCPhysAd:\t%016llx\n", *(rip + 5));
> + }
Does checking *(rip + 5) here suppress valid memory accesses to physical
address 0x0?
While this successfully hides kernel-zeroed addresses for unprivileged users,
it seems like it cannot distinguish between software-zeroed values and actual
0x0 addresses. Could this silently discard valid diagnostic data during
privileged profiling sessions if an actual hardware access to physical page 0
occurs?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508060004.2575-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 5:59 [PATCH v3 0/8] perf tools amd ibs: Fixes + Zen6 enhancements Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] perf test amd ibs: Fix incorrect kernel version check Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] perf tool ibs: Sync AMD IBS header file Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] perf test ibs: Skip privilege test on Zen6 and newer platforms Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] perf amd ibs: Suppress bogus TlbRefillLat and DCPhysAd on Zen4+ Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 18:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-12 8:49 ` Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] perf amd ibs: Make Fetch status bits dependent on PhyAddrValid for newer platforms Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] perf amd ibs: Decode Remote-Socket flag in IBS OP raw dump Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] perf amd ibs: Decode Streaming-store " Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-08 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] perf doc: Document new IBS capabilities in man page Ravi Bangoria
2026-05-10 6:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] perf tools amd ibs: Fixes + Zen6 enhancements Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508182027.F2DF1C2BCC7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox