From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/28] perf zstd: Fix compression error path in zstd_compress_stream_to_records()
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 00:13:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512001341.7783FC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260510033424.255812-4-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 6 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Out-of-bounds write occurs before the newly added buffer size guard
- [High] Unsigned integer underflow and memory leak when compression yields 0 bytes
- [High] Missing context reset on buffer-full error path causes state corruption
- [High] Error propagation causes deterministic failure for incompressible data
- [High] Returning -1 on compression failure causes duplicated events
- [Medium] Ignored ZSTD_flushStream return value masks compression errors
--
commit 6e057a82790023201cbd71817c336d831f984f7f
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf zstd: Fix compression error path in zstd_compress_stream_to_records()
This commit changes the error handling in zstd_compress_stream_to_records()
from falling back to uncompressed data to returning -1 and resetting the
compression stream. It also adds a bounds check to prevent dst_size underflows.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/zstd.c b/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
> --- a/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ ssize_t zstd_compress_stream_to_records(struct zstd_data *data, void *dst, size_
> while (input.pos < input.size) {
> record = dst;
> size = process_header(record, 0);
The process_header callback writes the event header to the record pointer
unconditionally. Since this happens before the newly added dst_size check,
can this cause an out-of-bounds write if the remaining dst_size is smaller
than the header size?
> + /* Output buffer full — cannot fit even the record header */
> + if (size > dst_size)
> + return -1;
The patch adds a context reset for ZSTD errors so the stream is usable
for flush retries. However, this early return for a full buffer exits
without resetting the context. Will the caller retry flushing with a
partially compressed internal state, producing corrupted output?
Replacing the uncompressed fallback with returning -1 propagates the error
to perf_mmap__push.
If a ring buffer wrap occurs and the second half returns -1, will
perf_mmap__push abort and skip perf_mmap__consume, leaving the
kernel buffer tail pointer unmodified and duplicating the first half on
the next read cycle?
Additionally, if a chunk is incompressible and its size exceeds the static
destination buffer size, will the out_child retry loop overflow again and
permanently block?
[ ... ]
> @@ -65,8 +68,16 @@ ssize_t zstd_compress_stream_to_records(struct zstd_data *data, void *dst, size_
> ret = ZSTD_compressStream(data->cstream, &output, &input);
> ZSTD_flushStream(data->cstream, &output);
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the return value of
ZSTD_flushStream is not captured in ret. Does the subsequent
if (ZSTD_isError(ret)) check silently discard flush errors, leading to
truncated records?
> if (ZSTD_isError(ret)) {
[ ... ]
> }
> size = output.pos;
> size = process_header(record, size);
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but if ZSTD_compressStream and
ZSTD_flushStream produce 0 bytes, output.pos and size will be 0.
Since process_header(record, 0) acts as an initialization command and
returns the header size again, will this code subtract the header size
from dst_size a second time?
Could this cause dst_size to underflow, completely defeating bounds
checks on the next iteration and leaking uninitialized memory into the
output?
> compressed += size;
> dst += size;
> dst_size -= size;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260510033424.255812-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-10 3:33 [PATCH 00/28] perf: Harden perf.data parsing against crafted/corrupted files Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 01/28] perf session: Add minimum event size validation table Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-11 19:01 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 02/28] perf tools: Fix event_contains() macro to verify full field extent Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-11 23:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 03/28] perf zstd: Fix compression error path in zstd_compress_stream_to_records() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12 0:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 04/28] perf zstd: Fix multi-iteration decompression and error handling Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 05/28] perf session: Fix PERF_RECORD_READ swap and dump for variable-length events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 06/28] perf session: Align auxtrace_info priv size before byte-swapping Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 07/28] perf session: Add validated swap infrastructure with null-termination checks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12 4:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 08/28] perf session: Use bounded copy for PERF_RECORD_TIME_CONV Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 09/28] perf session: Validate HEADER_ATTR alignment and attr.size before swapping Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 10/28] perf session: Validate nr fields against event size on both swap and common paths Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 11/28] perf header: Byte-swap build ID event pid and bounds check section entries Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 12/28] perf cpumap: Reject RANGE_CPUS with start_cpu > end_cpu Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 13/28] perf auxtrace: Harden auxtrace_error event handling Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 14/28] perf session: Add byte-swap and bounds check for PERF_RECORD_BPF_METADATA events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 15/28] perf header: Validate null-termination in PERF_RECORD_EVENT_UPDATE string fields Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 16/28] perf tools: Bounds check perf_event_attr fields against attr.size before printing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 17/28] perf header: Propagate feature section processing errors Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 18/28] perf header: Validate f_attr.ids section before use in perf_session__read_header() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 19/28] perf header: Validate feature section size and add read path bounds checking Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 20/28] perf header: Sanity check HEADER_EVENT_DESC attr.size before swap Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 21/28] perf header: Validate bitmap size before allocating in do_read_bitmap() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 22/28] perf session: Add byte-swap for PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED2 events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 23/28] perf tools: Harden compressed event processing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 24/28] perf session: Check for decompression buffer size overflow Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 25/28] perf session: Bound nr_cpus_avail and validate sample CPU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 26/28] perf timechart: Bounds check cpu_id and fix topology_map allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12 18:32 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 27/28] perf kwork: Bounds check work->cpu before indexing cpus_runtime[] Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10 3:34 ` [PATCH 28/28] perf test: Add truncated perf.data robustness test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260512001341.7783FC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox