Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zide Chen" <zide.chen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Defer ADL global PMON enable to enable_box()
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 02:33:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513023345.ED78AC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511230527.26096-4-zide.chen@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The deferred global PMON enablement permanently leaks the hardware power state after the first use, nullifying the intended power savings.
--

commit ce0046bfd8b6ed5388332db6e76ea45581716939
Author: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>

perf/x86/intel/uncore: Defer ADL global PMON enable to enable_box()

This commit drops adl_uncore_msr_init_box() and defers programming the
ADL_UNC_PERF_GLOBAL_CTL MSR to enable_box(). The goal is to save power by
ensuring the global control register is only enabled when a box is actually
used.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
> index 3dbc6bacbd9de..edddd4f9ab5fc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
[ ... ]
> -static void adl_uncore_msr_init_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
> -{
> -	if (box->pmu->pmu_idx == 0)
> -		wrmsrq(ADL_UNC_PERF_GLOBAL_CTL, SNB_UNC_GLOBAL_CTL_EN);
> -}
> -
>  static void adl_uncore_msr_enable_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
>  {
>  	wrmsrq(ADL_UNC_PERF_GLOBAL_CTL, SNB_UNC_GLOBAL_CTL_EN);

Does this unintentionally leave the hardware power state permanently enabled
after the first use?

The Linux perf core framework unconditionally calls perf_pmu_enable(), which
maps to uncore_pmu_enable() and executes enable_box(), at the end of PMU
transactions. This includes event removal sequences:

perf_pmu_disable()
   event->pmu->del()
   perf_pmu_enable()

Since adl_uncore_msr_enable_box() unconditionally writes
SNB_UNC_GLOBAL_CTL_EN, it seems the global PMON control is immediately
re-enabled and remains active even when zero events are in use, negating
the intended power savings.

Additionally, if a check like if (box->n_active) were added here, could
that silently break concurrent perf sessions on other uncore boxes?

Because disable_box() unconditionally clears the shared MSR during
transactions if pmu_idx == 0, failing to re-enable it would leave PMON
globally disabled for the entire die. Safely managing dynamic power for this
shared global MSR might require a package-level active reference count
across all boxes.

> @@ -587,7 +581,6 @@ static void adl_uncore_msr_exit_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
>  }
>  
>  static struct intel_uncore_ops adl_uncore_msr_ops = {
> -	.init_box	= adl_uncore_msr_init_box,
>  	.enable_box	= adl_uncore_msr_enable_box,
>  	.disable_box	= adl_uncore_msr_disable_box,
>  	.exit_box	= adl_uncore_msr_exit_box,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260511230527.26096-1-zide.chen@intel.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 23:05 [PATCH 0/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Bug fixes and cleanups Zide Chen
2026-05-11 23:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix discovery unit lookup for multi-die systems Zide Chen
2026-05-13  1:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-11 23:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix PCI device refcount leak in UPI discovery Zide Chen
2026-05-12  9:27   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-12 17:35     ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-13  0:31       ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-11 23:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Defer ADL global PMON enable to enable_box() Zide Chen
2026-05-13  2:33   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-11 23:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move die_to_cpu() to uncore.c Zide Chen
2026-05-13  2:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-11 23:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_die_to_cpu() for offline dies Zide Chen
2026-05-11 23:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Implement global init callback for GNR uncore Zide Chen
2026-05-13  4:25   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260513023345.ED78AC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox