From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf bench: add --write-size option to sched pipe
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 16:39:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521163951.2E2FB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521-perf_bench_pipe-v2-1-720b6ff7f0fa@debian.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] File descriptors allocated for pipes are leaked when returning early due to an fcntl() failure.
--
commit a15da46bb7bbcff2fe4b600fd4cd1fdf6d6d3ff0
Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
perf bench: add --write-size option to sched pipe
This commit adds a --write-size option to the sched pipe benchmark in perf to
allow testing the pipe page-allocation path. It updates the benchmark to
allocate a buffer per thread and resize the pipe capacity via fcntl() when a
larger write size is specified.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/sched-pipe.c b/tools/perf/bench/sched-pipe.c
> index 70139036d68f0..216d3121d438d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/bench/sched-pipe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/bench/sched-pipe.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -233,12 +238,39 @@ int bench_sched_pipe(int argc, const char **argv)
[ ... ]
> BUG_ON(pipe2(pipe_1, flags));
> BUG_ON(pipe2(pipe_2, flags));
>
> + /*
> + * On a custom write_size, resize the pipes so a single payload fits.
> + */
> + if (write_size > sizeof(int)) {
> + int r1 = fcntl(pipe_1[1], F_SETPIPE_SZ, write_size);
> + int r2 = fcntl(pipe_2[1], F_SETPIPE_SZ, write_size);
> +
> + if (r1 < 0 || r2 < 0 ||
> + (unsigned int)r1 < write_size ||
> + (unsigned int)r2 < write_size) {
> + fprintf(stderr,
> + "--write-size %u exceeds /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size\n",
> + write_size);
> + return -1;
[Severity: Medium]
Are the file descriptors allocated for pipe_1 and pipe_2 leaked on this error
path?
The pipe2() calls just above this block allocate four file descriptors. If the
fcntl() operations fail and this path returns -1, those descriptors appear to
be left open.
> + }
> + }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260521-perf_bench_pipe-v2-1-720b6ff7f0fa@debian.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 16:15 [PATCH v2] perf bench: add --write-size option to sched pipe Breno Leitao
2026-05-21 16:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-21 17:12 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-26 2:17 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521163951.2E2FB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox