Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base on rdpmc user disable state
Date: Fri,  5 Jun 2026 09:11:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605011136.2043393-4-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605011136.2043393-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

After introducing the RDPMC user disable feature, user-space RDPMC may
return 0 instead of the actual event count. This creates an inconsistency
with cap_user_rdpmc, where cap_user_rdpmc is set, but user-space RDPMC
only returns 0.

To accurately represent the user-space RDPMC capability, update
cap_user_rdpmc based on the RDPMC user disable state. If RDPMC user
disable is enabled, cap_user_rdpmc is set to false, allowing user-space
programs to fall back to the read() syscall to obtain the real event
count.

Since arch_perf_update_userpage() could be called for software events,
enhance x86_pmu_has_rdpmc_user_disable() to only check the x86 PMUs.

Fixes: 59af95e028d4 ("perf/x86/intel: Add support for rdpmc user disable feature")
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
---

Original patch link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260316050838.3624051-2-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/

 arch/x86/events/core.c       | 3 +++
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 5 +++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 3bd0522afe6d..6cd95b8e31cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2797,6 +2797,9 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
 	userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 0;
 	userpg->cap_user_rdpmc =
 		!!(event->hw.flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT);
+	if (x86_pmu_has_rdpmc_user_disable(event->pmu) &&
+	    event->hw.config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_RDPMC_USER_DISABLE)
+		userpg->cap_user_rdpmc = 0;
 	userpg->pmc_width = x86_pmu.cntval_bits;
 
 	if (!using_native_sched_clock() || !sched_clock_stable())
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index dbb5c8e8a8ea..4003e2e0aa9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -1359,8 +1359,9 @@ static inline u64 x86_pmu_get_event_config(struct perf_event *event)
 
 static inline bool x86_pmu_has_rdpmc_user_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
-	return !!(hybrid(pmu, config_mask) &
-		 ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_RDPMC_USER_DISABLE);
+	return is_x86_pmu(pmu) &&
+	       (hybrid(pmu, config_mask) &
+		ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_RDPMC_USER_DISABLE);
 }
 
 extern struct event_constraint emptyconstraint;
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-05  1:11 [PATCH 0/8] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf/x86: Introduce is_x86_pmu() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05  1:11 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-06-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Fix redundant branch type check in intel_pmu_lbr_filter() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf/x86/intel: Fix kernel address leakages in LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05  1:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  3:20     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05  1:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  3:29     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf/core: Fix kernel register info leak via hardware skid Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05  1:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  3:42     ` Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260605011136.2043393-4-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox