Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf mmap: Guard cpu__get_node() return in aio_bind()
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 20:48:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605204831.F0C4E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605203316.1758661-2-acme@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] A failure during AIO initialization causes a NULL pointer dereference during cleanup in `perf_mmap__aio_munmap`.
--

commit 288781c48aca8cf278f6a1c8e4af510fc3cb0e4c
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

    perf mmap: Guard cpu__get_node() return in aio_bind()
    
    perf_mmap__aio_bind() passes the cpu__get_node() return value directly
    to an unsigned long variable (node_index).  When cpu__get_node() returns
    -1 for an unknown CPU, the implicit int-to-unsigned-long conversion
    sign-extends it to ULONG_MAX. Check the return value in a signed
    temporary before assigning to node_index, and skip the NUMA binding
    when the node is unknown.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mmap.c b/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> index b69f926d314b1..4404a99eee45f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> @@ -104,9 +104,15 @@ static int perf_mmap__aio_bind(struct mmap *map, int idx, struct perf_cpu cpu, i
>  	int err = 0;
>  
>  	if (affinity != PERF_AFFINITY_SYS && cpu__max_node() > 1) {
> +		int node;
> +
>  		data = map->aio.data[idx];
>  		mmap_len = mmap__mmap_len(map);
> -		node_index = cpu__get_node(cpu);
> +		node = cpu__get_node(cpu);
> +		/* -1 sign-extends to ULONG_MAX, wrapping bitmap_zalloc(0) and OOB __set_bit */
> +		if (node < 0)
> +			return 0;
> +		node_index = node;
>  		node_mask = bitmap_zalloc(node_index + 1);
>  		if (!node_mask) {
>  			pr_err("Failed to allocate node mask for mbind: error %m\n");

[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential NULL
pointer dereference during error cleanup if AIO initialization fails.

If memory allocation fails early in perf_mmap__aio_mmap():

tools/perf/util/mmap.c:perf_mmap__aio_mmap() {
    ...
	map->aio.nr_cblocks = mp->nr_cblocks;
	if (map->aio.nr_cblocks) {
		map->aio.aiocb = calloc(map->aio.nr_cblocks, sizeof(struct aiocb *));
		if (!map->aio.aiocb) {
			pr_debug2("failed to allocate aiocb for data buffer, error %m\n");
			return -1;
		}
    ...
}

The function returns an error, but leaves map->aio.nr_cblocks set to the
requested number of blocks while map->aio.data remains NULL.

This error bubbles up and triggers error recovery, which eventually calls
perf_mmap__aio_munmap():

tools/perf/util/mmap.c:perf_mmap__aio_munmap() {
    ...
	for (i = 0; i < map->aio.nr_cblocks; ++i)
		perf_mmap__aio_free(map, i);
    ...
}

Which loops based on nr_cblocks and passes the map to perf_mmap__aio_free():

tools/perf/util/mmap.c:perf_mmap__aio_free() {
    ...
	if (map->aio.data[idx]) {
    ...
}

Is it possible for map->aio.data to be NULL here? It seems evaluating this
array index (or calling zfree(&(map->aio.data[idx])) when libnuma is not
supported) could cause an immediate NULL pointer dereference.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605203316.1758661-1-acme@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-05 20:33 [PATCHES v1 0/8] perf tools: Fix OOB writes, refcount bugs, and BUG_ON in mmap/stat/c2c/sched Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf mmap: Guard cpu__get_node() return in aio_bind() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:48   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf stat: Bounds-check CPU index in topology aggregation callbacks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf c2c: Bounds-check CPU and node IDs before bitmap and array access Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf c2c: Bounds-check CPU IDs in setup_nodes() topology loop Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf sched: Clean up idle_threads entry on init failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf sched: Fix thread reference leak in idle hist processing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf sched: Use thread__put() in free_idle_threads() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf sched: Replace BUG_ON and add NULL checks in replay event helpers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 20:46   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260605204831.F0C4E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox