From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf timechart: Release event samples at the end
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:05:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260606000525.1C7B11F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605235131.2440270-2-namhyung@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The newly added timechart__release() function introduces a double-free vulnerability by unconditionally freeing cs->backtrace for all CPU samples, even though sched_switch() shares the exact same backtrace string pointer between multiple samples.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-after-free inside cat_backtrace() error path due to freeing the memstream buffer before closing the stream.
--
commit ee81a934b42b228370b97d5f0e7e208b04ba839a
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
perf timechart: Release event samples at the end
Add timechart__release() to free all data structures added during the
sample processing.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c b/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c
> index 28f33e39895d3..99f5102239963 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1509,6 +1509,73 @@ static void write_svg_file(struct timechart *tchart, const char *filename)
> svg_close();
> }
>
> +static void timechart__release(struct timechart *tchart)
> +{
> + struct per_pid *p = tchart->all_data;
[ ... ]
> + while (c) {
> + struct per_pidcomm *next_comm = c->next;
> + struct cpu_sample *cs = c->samples;
> + struct io_sample *ios = c->io_samples;
> +
> + while (cs) {
> + struct cpu_sample *next = cs->next;
> +
> + zfree(&cs->backtrace);
[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally freeing cs->backtrace cause a double-free?
Looking at sched_switch() in tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c, it passes the
same dynamically allocated backtrace string pointer to pid_put_sample() for
both prev_pid and next_pid:
tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c:sched_switch() {
...
pid_put_sample(tchart, prev_pid, TYPE_RUNNING, cpu,
prev_p->current->state_since, timestamp,
backtrace);
...
pid_put_sample(tchart, next_pid, p->current->state, cpu,
p->current->state_since, timestamp,
backtrace);
...
}
Then pid_put_sample() stores this raw pointer into sample->backtrace without
duplicating it:
tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c:pid_put_sample() {
...
sample->backtrace = backtrace;
...
}
Because the pointer is shared among multiple CPU samples, freeing it
unconditionally for every sample here could result in a double-free memory
corruption.
> + cs->next = NULL;
> + free(cs);
> +
> + cs = next;
> + }
[ ... ]
> @@ -2037,6 +2104,7 @@ int cmd_timechart(int argc, const char **argv)
>
> ret = __cmd_timechart(&tchart, output_name);
> out:
> + timechart__release(&tchart);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at cat_backtrace() in
the same file, is there a use-after-free in its error path?
When the callchain context is invalid, it attempts to discard the buffer by
freeing p:
tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c:cat_backtrace() {
...
zfree(&p);
goto exit;
...
But the goto exit path closes the stream:
exit:
addr_location__exit(&al);
fclose(f);
return p;
}
Because fclose(f) operates on the open stream, it accesses its internal
buffer to append a null byte. If p was flushed and freed, wouldn't this
cause a use-after-free?
Additionally, fclose(f) overwrites p with the buffer address, which means
the function might return a freed pointer to the caller.
> zfree(&cpus_cstate_start_times);
> zfree(&cpus_cstate_state);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605235131.2440270-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-06 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 23:51 [PATCH v2 0/4] perf timechart: Fix memory leaks Namhyung Kim
2026-06-05 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf timechart: Release event samples at the end Namhyung Kim
2026-06-06 0:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf timechart: Fix memory leaks during record Namhyung Kim
2026-06-05 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf timechart: Fix memory leaks in draw_wakeups() Namhyung Kim
2026-06-05 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf test: Update perf timechart test Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260606000525.1C7B11F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox