Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] perf build: Add libnvme feature detection
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:12:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609071226.B77D71F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609070348.541964-2-irogers@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The feature check for `libnvme` fails to utilize `pkg-config` during the test compilation, contradicting the commit message and breaking detection when the library is in a non-standard path.
- [Medium] `libnvme` is omitted from `test-all.c`, which causes false positives in fast-path detection and triggers continuous feature-dump flip-flops and rebuilds.
--

commit 1f4a72ba50b99659f0972d94ef171f8be76bc329
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

perf build: Add libnvme feature detection

Introduce a feature check for libnvme so that we can conditionally
compile the NVMe PMU driver. This checks for the availability of the
libnvme headers and library using pkg-config.

> diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.feature b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> index ed1374af31c16..bf85032415397 100644
> --- a/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> +++ b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ FEATURE_TESTS_BASIC :=                  \
>          libbfd                          \
>  	libbfd-threadsafe		\
>          libelf                          \
> +        libnvme                         \

[Severity: Medium]
Without including test-libnvme.c in test-all.c, the fast-path build will
succeed even if libnvme is absent.

This can cause the initial discovery to falsely report libnvme as present,
which then flip-flops when individual checks are run later in
tools/perf/Makefile.config. This mismatch invalidates the build cache and
triggers full feature evaluations and rebuilds on every make invocation.

Since libnvme was added to FEATURE_TESTS_BASIC, does it also need to be
included in tools/build/feature/test-all.c?

>          libelf-getphdrnum               \
>          libelf-gelf_getnote             \
>          libelf-getshdrstrndx            \

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/tools/build/feature/Makefile b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> index 62909a9c799d3..fd00e0be60690 100644
> --- a/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ $(OUTPUT)test-libcap.bin:
>  $(OUTPUT)test-libelf.bin:
>  	$(BUILD) -lelf
>  
> +$(OUTPUT)test-libnvme.bin:
> +	$(BUILD) -lnvme
> +

[Severity: Medium]
The commit message states the availability of libnvme headers and library are
checked using pkg-config. However, because libnvme is omitted from the
FEATURE_PKG_CONFIG list in tools/build/Makefile.feature, the variables
FEATURE_CHECK_CFLAGS-libnvme and FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-libnvme are never
initialized.

This rule manually invokes $(BUILD) -lnvme, falling back to standard compiler
paths instead of leveraging pkg-config variables.

If libnvme is installed in a non-standard location discoverable only via
pkg-config, could the feature test fail and incorrectly disable NVMe PMU
support?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609070348.541964-1-irogers@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  7:03 [PATCH v1 0/3] perf pmu: Add tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09  7:03 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] perf build: Add libnvme feature detection Ian Rogers
2026-06-09  7:12   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09  7:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] perf pmu: Implement tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09  7:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  7:03 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] perf tests: Add NVMe PMU event parsing test Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609071226.B77D71F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox