From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F54831F992; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 14:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781014900; cv=none; b=iC+YWsPtV8P3kxiJp6nSG7n3hVOhRdKtznTwxjymrDl9BQwarnFHU/kYQYGIoGI8Bl5LopG8l+2EFzZ4KBveEDyrFEwb+ubYO9NY1ze9NV12hORUUM7q9fgYivlevt94/KmYycJcRg7MWffBDjhR70YVRYB/x7IY6qw7PliqUgk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781014900; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RZQdR2RKKQFK1T///gJQrEsaJ+JbvCh3icAhhy8YLwg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Fs2JXqXtVynUnWwRtCUj7XkAJFE4uzDXiQUBO1CyL9jD+C5JqpEw/qlPN4n3JoRxFPezVaI0tlmGE2YaI28F0NaxWW+DrGr55aJdtLtuDTxXb8mesWF6I+eyewqBUCiUxoBcgkecH3QJ3Yn0bK7qHQ3NmXGgwXkylETV2lEsaEc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf20.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49AD8F3F9; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 14:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19B1E20025; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 14:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 10:21:20 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Shuai Xue Cc: Wang Han , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Chen Pei , Andy Chiu , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Deepak Gupta , Puranjay Mohan , Conor Dooley , Josh Poimboeuf , Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Petr Mladek , Joe Lawrence , Shuah Khan , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com, zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com, jkchen@linux.alibaba.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] scripts/sorttable: Handle RISC-V patchable ftrace entries Message-ID: <20260609102120.359f3c4c@fedora> In-Reply-To: <6753385b-c2ab-4ed0-9400-78ce967450ba@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20260527123530.2593918-1-wanghan@linux.alibaba.com> <20260528082310.1994388-2-wanghan@linux.alibaba.com> <0a913398-3d0c-472e-89c4-062052eae04d@linux.alibaba.com> <20260601095746.70c01d24@fedora> <6753385b-c2ab-4ed0-9400-78ce967450ba@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: 45xon1xuzxd7bgbg6edxpht5trjjyge4 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 19B1E20025 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1/HKKn7GymGBUtkbeNr+MEsQdyMhp17MdU= X-HE-Tag: 1781014880-666201 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1+rK/eN1BdojHWIcLwqDes8ikyUSWOVgDM2z/pUIyOFyAee0s6My7Xxv1XzzZB08fnXey3byMofDxmK30CuRFQCjWETw/qIBkjcJV57g+7dTfTdypOfD2pf0hdNCmgUxgCz/J3/gcLcZYfC0zSHjnyQIlGUv9j+Isx5nTYNWn+1B1CJbxTLmg+8dEzmXK9YwAdspV+E77PvKlOsfl9CkgQt5e9eMdCkHTeHy4Zg+CZjBhu/tSKVgIrKau/2+NoIvgk/ss8SC2tb8MP0B6hSQKNl7Zy5c1VIBSaVQ8O0do7KHzUUkMExhc5OsUmLw+L6MoGJv5Tz/LKKkj6b4PH6Qkyj5rBcgmOV845Q9MeB4BlbRCOS2hCWeUjRAg8fESSRucIKnZULyjZjNw== On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:10:44 +0800 Shuai Xue wrote: > It's a pure comment cosmetic, not worth a respin on its own. But for the I don't know. I've respinned for better comments before. > rest of the feedback on this series (the frame-record metadata contract > in patch 2 and the dead state->regs field / Call Trace output change in > patch 6) are the ones actually worth a new version. > > Just to get the routing straight: are you planning to pick this one up > through the tracing tree on its own? > > It feels like a good candidate for that -- it's an independent > regression fix (Fixes: 0ca1724b56af) that breaks *all* RISC-V dynamic > ftrace, not just livepatch, so it shouldn't have to wait on the rest of > the livepatch series. As it affects RISCV and I don't have a RISCV to test, I would feel more comfortable with it going through a RISCV tree that can test the patch. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt -- Steve