Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "James Clark" <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/19] perf test: Add named_threads workload
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:50:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609145047.276961F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-james-cs-context-tracking-fix-v4-9-44f9fb9e5c42@linaro.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The thread work loop is completely optimized away by the compiler, introduces a C11 data race on a shared global variable, and performs addition instead of the documented multiplication.
--

commit af99f4d30611866956b89fbc6d9ae547214d6310
Author: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>

perf test: Add named_threads workload

This commit adds a new named_threads test workload to perf, intended to spawn
multiple concurrent threads to verify processor trace decoding handles them
properly.

>     Add a workload that runs X threads that run a unique function named
>     "named_threads_thread[x]" which performs a multiplication in a loop for
>     Y loops. Each thread sets its name to "thread[x]".

[Severity: Medium]
The commit message states the workload performs a multiplication in a loop,
but the code performs an addition. Should the implementation be updated to
match the description?

> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/named_threads.c b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/named_threads.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..d051d41a3cfe4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/named_threads.c
[ ... ]
> +static int iterations = 500;
> +int named_threads_work = 1234;
> +
> +typedef void *(*thread_fn_t)(void *);
> +
> +#define DEFINE_THREAD(n)						\
> +noinline void *named_threads_thread##n(void *arg __maybe_unused)	\
> +{									\
> +	pthread_setname_np(pthread_self(), "thread" #n);		\
> +	for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)				\
> +		named_threads_work += 3;				\
> +									\
> +	return NULL;							\
> +}

[Severity: Medium]
Does updating the shared global named_threads_work concurrently across
multiple threads without atomics or locks cause an unintended data race?

Additionally, because this loop lacks memory barriers or volatile qualifiers,
will the compiler optimize it away under -O3 compilation? 

If it gets optimized into a single operation, the threads might exit almost
instantaneously, preventing the workload from generating the overlapping
processor trace samples it was designed to test.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609-james-cs-context-tracking-fix-v4-0-44f9fb9e5c42@linaro.org?part=9

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 14:30 [PATCH v4 00/19] perf cs-etm: Queue context packets for frontend James Clark
2026-06-09 14:30 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] " James Clark
2026-06-09 14:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 14:30 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] perf test: Add workload-ctl option James Clark
2026-06-09 14:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 14:30 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] perf test: Add a workload that forces context switches James Clark
2026-06-09 14:30 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] perf test cs-etm: Test process attribution James Clark
2026-06-09 14:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 14:30 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] perf test: Add deterministic workload James Clark
2026-06-09 14:30 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] perf test cs-etm: Replace unroll loop thread with deterministic decode test James Clark
2026-06-09 14:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] perf test cs-etm: Remove asm_pure_loop test James Clark
2026-06-09 14:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] perf test cs-etm: Replace memcpy test with raw dump stress test James Clark
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] perf test: Add named_threads workload James Clark
2026-06-09 14:50   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] perf test cs-etm: Test decoding for concurrent threads test James Clark
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] perf test cs-etm: Remove duplicate branch tests James Clark
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] perf test cs-etm: Skip if not root James Clark
2026-06-09 14:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] perf test cs-etm: Reduce snapshot size James Clark
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] perf test cs-etm: Speed up basic test James Clark
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] perf test cs-etm: Remove unused Coresight workloads James Clark
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] perf test cs-etm: Make disassembly test use kcore James Clark
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] perf test cs-etm: Add all branch instructions to test James Clark
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] perf test cs-etm: Speed up disassembly test James Clark
2026-06-09 15:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] perf test cs-etm: Move existing tests to coresight folder James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609145047.276961F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox