Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf build: Add libnvme feature detection
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:08:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609170816.C503E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609165726.786694-2-irogers@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The libnvme feature test hardcodes the `-lnvme` compiler flag, allowing the test to pass even if `pkg-config` is missing or fails to locate `libnvme.pc` (provided the library is in a standard system path). However, `tools/perf/Makefile.config` strictly relies on the output of `pkg-config --libs-only-l libnvme` to populate `EXTLIBS`. This mismatch causes the build system to enable NVMe PMU support based on the successful feature test, but then fail during the final linking stage of the `perf` executable due to missing `-lnvme` flags, resulting in undefined references to libnvme functions.
--

commit a99ed0c67b6c2d89a762f7be2b57899a90210460
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

perf build: Add libnvme feature detection

Introduce a feature check for libnvme so that we can conditionally compile
the NVMe PMU driver. This checks for the availability of the libnvme headers
and library using pkg-config.

> diff --git a/tools/build/feature/Makefile b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> index 62909a9c799d3..fd00e0be60690 100644
> --- a/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/build/feature/Makefile

[ ... ]

> @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ $(OUTPUT)test-libcap.bin:
>  $(OUTPUT)test-libelf.bin:
>  	$(BUILD) -lelf
>  
> +$(OUTPUT)test-libnvme.bin:
> +	$(BUILD) -lnvme

[Severity: Low]
Does hardcoding the -lnvme flag here bypass the pkg-config requirement?

If libnvme is installed in standard paths but its pkg-config file is missing
or pkg-config is absent, this feature test will still pass.

> +
>  $(OUTPUT)test-eventfd.bin:
>  	$(BUILD)

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.config b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
> index 6e7b15fab2ecc..79c4ad10bc181 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.config
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.config

[ ... ]

> @@ -1060,6 +1060,18 @@ ifndef NO_CAPSTONE
>    endif
>  endif
>  
> +ifndef NO_LIBNVME
> +  $(call feature_check,libnvme)
> +  ifeq ($(feature-libnvme), 1)
> +    CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBNVME_SUPPORT $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags libnvme)
> +    LDFLAGS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --libs-only-L libnvme)
> +    EXTLIBS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --libs-only-l libnvme)

[Severity: Low]
Since EXTLIBS relies strictly on pkg-config here, will the build fail during
final linking if the feature test succeeded using the hardcoded -lnvme flag?

If pkg-config doesn't return the required flags, the perf executable would
encounter undefined references instead of gracefully falling back to a build
without NVMe PMU support.

> +    $(call detected,CONFIG_LIBNVME)
> +  else
> +    msg := $(warning No libnvme found, disables NVMe PMU support, please install libnvme-dev/libnvme-devel);
> +  endif
> +endif

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609165726.786694-1-irogers@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  7:03 [PATCH v1 0/3] perf pmu: Add tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09  7:03 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] perf build: Add libnvme feature detection Ian Rogers
2026-06-09  7:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  7:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] perf pmu: Implement tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09  7:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  7:03 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] perf tests: Add NVMe PMU event parsing test Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] perf pmu: Add tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 16:57   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] perf build: Add libnvme feature detection Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 17:08     ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 16:57   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] perf pmu: Implement tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 17:19     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 16:57   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] perf tests: Add NVMe PMU event parsing test Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609170816.C503E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox