From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf build: Add libnvme feature detection
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:08:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609170816.C503E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609165726.786694-2-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The libnvme feature test hardcodes the `-lnvme` compiler flag, allowing the test to pass even if `pkg-config` is missing or fails to locate `libnvme.pc` (provided the library is in a standard system path). However, `tools/perf/Makefile.config` strictly relies on the output of `pkg-config --libs-only-l libnvme` to populate `EXTLIBS`. This mismatch causes the build system to enable NVMe PMU support based on the successful feature test, but then fail during the final linking stage of the `perf` executable due to missing `-lnvme` flags, resulting in undefined references to libnvme functions.
--
commit a99ed0c67b6c2d89a762f7be2b57899a90210460
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf build: Add libnvme feature detection
Introduce a feature check for libnvme so that we can conditionally compile
the NVMe PMU driver. This checks for the availability of the libnvme headers
and library using pkg-config.
> diff --git a/tools/build/feature/Makefile b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> index 62909a9c799d3..fd00e0be60690 100644
> --- a/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
[ ... ]
> @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ $(OUTPUT)test-libcap.bin:
> $(OUTPUT)test-libelf.bin:
> $(BUILD) -lelf
>
> +$(OUTPUT)test-libnvme.bin:
> + $(BUILD) -lnvme
[Severity: Low]
Does hardcoding the -lnvme flag here bypass the pkg-config requirement?
If libnvme is installed in standard paths but its pkg-config file is missing
or pkg-config is absent, this feature test will still pass.
> +
> $(OUTPUT)test-eventfd.bin:
> $(BUILD)
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.config b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
> index 6e7b15fab2ecc..79c4ad10bc181 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.config
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
[ ... ]
> @@ -1060,6 +1060,18 @@ ifndef NO_CAPSTONE
> endif
> endif
>
> +ifndef NO_LIBNVME
> + $(call feature_check,libnvme)
> + ifeq ($(feature-libnvme), 1)
> + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBNVME_SUPPORT $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags libnvme)
> + LDFLAGS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --libs-only-L libnvme)
> + EXTLIBS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --libs-only-l libnvme)
[Severity: Low]
Since EXTLIBS relies strictly on pkg-config here, will the build fail during
final linking if the feature test succeeded using the hardcoded -lnvme flag?
If pkg-config doesn't return the required flags, the perf executable would
encounter undefined references instead of gracefully falling back to a build
without NVMe PMU support.
> + $(call detected,CONFIG_LIBNVME)
> + else
> + msg := $(warning No libnvme found, disables NVMe PMU support, please install libnvme-dev/libnvme-devel);
> + endif
> +endif
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609165726.786694-1-irogers@google.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 7:03 [PATCH v1 0/3] perf pmu: Add tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 7:03 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] perf build: Add libnvme feature detection Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 7:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 7:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] perf pmu: Implement tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 7:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 7:03 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] perf tests: Add NVMe PMU event parsing test Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] perf pmu: Add tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] perf build: Add libnvme feature detection Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 17:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] perf pmu: Implement tool-provided NVMe PMU Ian Rogers
2026-06-09 17:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] perf tests: Add NVMe PMU event parsing test Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609170816.C503E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox