Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Huang Shijie" <huangsj@hygon.cn>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: use get_i_mmap_root to access the file's i_mmap
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 06:31:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611063158.94DCC1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611061915.2354307-3-huangsj@hygon.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] In `nommu_shrink_inode_mappings`, `get_i_mmap_root()` is incorrectly called with `&inode->i_mapping` instead of `inode->i_mapping`, causing an invalid pointer calculation and subsequent memory corruption.
--

commit af3e57c8cfc7072a4088af8cf0bf41f373c9261b
Author: Huang Shijie <huangsj@hygon.cn>

mm: use get_i_mmap_root to access the file's i_mmap

This patch introduces the get_i_mmap_root() helper to encapsulate direct 
accesses to the i_mmap interval tree root within struct address_space. It 
updates various architectures and core memory management subsystems to use 
the new helper.

> diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> index ed3934bc2de48..0f18ffc658e95 100644
> --- a/mm/nommu.c
> +++ b/mm/nommu.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1804,6 +1804,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(copy_remote_vm_str);
>  int nommu_shrink_inode_mappings(struct inode *inode, size_t size,
>  				size_t newsize)
>  {
> +	struct rb_root_cached *root = get_i_mmap_root(&inode->i_mapping);

[Severity: High]
Does this code pass a double pointer to get_i_mmap_root()? 

Since inode->i_mapping is already a pointer to struct address_space, passing 
&inode->i_mapping provides a struct address_space ** instead of the expected 
struct address_space *. 

This will cause get_i_mmap_root() to calculate an invalid address by adding 
the structure offset to the address of the i_mapping pointer itself. The 
subsequent call to vma_interval_tree_foreach() will interpret garbage memory 
as an rb_root_cached structure, leading to a panic when it attempts to 
dereference the fake rb_node pointers. Should this be called with 
inode->i_mapping instead?

>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>  	struct vm_region *region;
>  	pgoff_t low, high;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611061915.2354307-1-huangsj@hygon.cn?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11  6:18 [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: split the file's i_mmap tree for NUMA Huang Shijie
2026-06-11  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: use mapping_mapped to simplify the code Huang Shijie
2026-06-11  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: use get_i_mmap_root to access the file's i_mmap Huang Shijie
2026-06-11  6:31   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/fs: split the file's i_mmap tree Huang Shijie
2026-06-11  6:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  6:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] docs/mm: update document for split " Huang Shijie
2026-06-11  6:26   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611063158.94DCC1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=huangsj@hygon.cn \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox