From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Huang Shijie" <huangsj@hygon.cn>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: use get_i_mmap_root to access the file's i_mmap
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 06:31:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611063158.94DCC1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611061915.2354307-3-huangsj@hygon.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] In `nommu_shrink_inode_mappings`, `get_i_mmap_root()` is incorrectly called with `&inode->i_mapping` instead of `inode->i_mapping`, causing an invalid pointer calculation and subsequent memory corruption.
--
commit af3e57c8cfc7072a4088af8cf0bf41f373c9261b
Author: Huang Shijie <huangsj@hygon.cn>
mm: use get_i_mmap_root to access the file's i_mmap
This patch introduces the get_i_mmap_root() helper to encapsulate direct
accesses to the i_mmap interval tree root within struct address_space. It
updates various architectures and core memory management subsystems to use
the new helper.
> diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> index ed3934bc2de48..0f18ffc658e95 100644
> --- a/mm/nommu.c
> +++ b/mm/nommu.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1804,6 +1804,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(copy_remote_vm_str);
> int nommu_shrink_inode_mappings(struct inode *inode, size_t size,
> size_t newsize)
> {
> + struct rb_root_cached *root = get_i_mmap_root(&inode->i_mapping);
[Severity: High]
Does this code pass a double pointer to get_i_mmap_root()?
Since inode->i_mapping is already a pointer to struct address_space, passing
&inode->i_mapping provides a struct address_space ** instead of the expected
struct address_space *.
This will cause get_i_mmap_root() to calculate an invalid address by adding
the structure offset to the address of the i_mapping pointer itself. The
subsequent call to vma_interval_tree_foreach() will interpret garbage memory
as an rb_root_cached structure, leading to a panic when it attempts to
dereference the fake rb_node pointers. Should this be called with
inode->i_mapping instead?
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> struct vm_region *region;
> pgoff_t low, high;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611061915.2354307-1-huangsj@hygon.cn?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 6:18 [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: split the file's i_mmap tree for NUMA Huang Shijie
2026-06-11 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: use mapping_mapped to simplify the code Huang Shijie
2026-06-11 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: use get_i_mmap_root to access the file's i_mmap Huang Shijie
2026-06-11 6:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/fs: split the file's i_mmap tree Huang Shijie
2026-06-11 6:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 6:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] docs/mm: update document for split " Huang Shijie
2026-06-11 6:26 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611063158.94DCC1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=huangsj@hygon.cn \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox