From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue()
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 22:54:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615225439.EF5CE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615223249.36598-6-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing NULL checks on `etmq` and `etmq->decoder` lead to segmentation faults on malformed or out-of-bounds auxtrace queues.
--
commit 97b84b25fe94e957ad4cb91dac4d3e8d49fe5b1d
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue()
cs_etm__get_queue() indexes etm->queues.queue_array[cpu] without
validating that cpu is within nr_queues. When processing
AUX_OUTPUT_HW_ID events, the cpu value comes from untrusted perf.data
trace payload and flows through cs_etm__process_trace_id_v0_1() and
cs_etm__queue_aux_fragment() without bounds checking, allowing an
out-of-bounds read with a crafted file. Add a bounds check in
cs_etm__get_queue() and NULL checks in all callers.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index d121c8f22028d..5d0664ff73b79 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -318,6 +324,9 @@ static int cs_etm__map_trace_id_v0(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm, u8 trace_chan_id
> int ret;
>
> etmq = etm->queues.queue_array[i].priv;
> + if (!etmq)
> + continue;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since we are adding NULL checks for the priv
field here because auxtrace_queues__grow() zero-initializes new entries, are
there other places that might still be vulnerable to this?
For example, in cs_etm__process_auxtrace_event(), we index into the queue array
and pass the priv field directly to cs_etm__dump_event():
err = auxtrace_queues__add_event(&etm->queues, session,
event, data_offset, &buffer);
if (err)
return err;
if (dump_trace)
if (auxtrace_buffer__get_data(buffer, fd)) {
cs_etm__dump_event(etm->queues.queue_array[idx].priv, buffer);
auxtrace_buffer__put_data(buffer);
}
Then cs_etm__dump_event() unconditionally dereferences etmq->decoder, which
causes a segmentation fault if etmq is NULL:
static void cs_etm__dump_event(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
struct auxtrace_buffer *buffer)
{
...
color_fprintf(stdout, color,
". ... CoreSight %s Trace data: size %#zx bytes\n",
cs_etm_decoder__get_name(etmq->decoder), buffer->size);
Additionally, if the queue is empty during decoder creation, etmq->decoder can
be NULL. Later in cs_etm__decode_data_block(), etmq->decoder is passed without
a NULL check:
ret = cs_etm_decoder__process_data_block(etmq->decoder,
etmq->offset,
Could this be triggered by a malformed or out-of-bounds auxtrace index,
resulting in a crash?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615223249.36598-1-acme@kernel.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 22:32 [PATCHES v2 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf machine: Propagate machine__init() error to callers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf machine: Use snprintf() for guestmount path construction Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf cs-etm: Require full global header in auxtrace_info size check Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf c2c: Free format list entries when c2c_hists__init() fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf c2c: Fix hist entry and format list leaks in c2c_he_free() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 23:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf bpf: Validate array presence before casting BPF prog info pointers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 23:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf dso: Set standard errno on decompression failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-16 2:27 [PATCHES v4 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 2:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 2:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:08 [PATCHES v3 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 1:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 1:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 21:36 [PATCHES v1 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 21:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 21:54 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615225439.EF5CE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox