Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] perf test: Truncate test description to fit terminal width
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 06:24:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616062446.583041F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616061404.41929-3-irogers@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incorrect File Descriptor Check for Terminal Width
--

commit f74a2825a5f95152494bcb0ab5c482df7aacb93e
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

perf test: Truncate test description to fit terminal width

This commit dynamically queries the terminal width to truncate printed test
descriptions. This prevents output corruption caused by long descriptions
wrapping around and breaking the carriage return delete sequences used in
the parallel test harness.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -413,19 +417,64 @@ static char *xml_escape(const char *str)
>  	return res ? res : strdup("");
>  }
>  
> +static int get_term_width(void)
> +{
> +	struct winsize ws;
> +	int cols = 80;
> +	int term_width;
> +
> +	if (!isatty(1))

[Severity: Medium]
Is isatty(1) the correct file descriptor to check here?

The test progress and results are printed to stderr via pr_info() and explicit
color_fprintf(stderr, ...) calls.

If a user runs perf test > /dev/null, stdout is redirected but stderr remains a
TTY. This check would return false and bypass truncation, causing the long
descriptions to wrap and corrupt the terminal display.

Conversely, if a user redirects stderr to a log file but leaves stdout as a
terminal (perf test 2> log.txt), this check evaluates to true and unnecessarily
truncates the log file output, destroying diagnostic information.

Should this check isatty(2) instead, since the output is sent to stderr?

> +		return 10000;
> +
> +	get_term_dimensions(&ws);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616061404.41929-1-irogers@google.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-16  1:27 [PATCH v1 00/12] perf tests: Enhancements, speedups, and flakiness fixes Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] perf parse-events: Restrict core PMU bypass to --cputype option Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] perf test: Truncate test description to fit terminal width Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] perf tests workloads: Support sub-second durations in noploop and thloop Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] perf tests: Add robust record retry helper and use subsecond workloads Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] perf tests: Skip metrics validation if system-wide recording lacks permission Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] perf tests: Fix Python JIT dump profiling test failure Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in trace record and replay test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in BPF counters test on hybrid systems Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in branch stack sampling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] perf tests: Speed up off-cpu profiling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] perf tests: Speed up lock contention analysis shell test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  1:27 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] perf tests: Speed up metrics checking shell tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] perf tests: Enhance robustness, speed up execution, and fix flakiness Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:13   ` [PATCH v2 01/12] perf parse-events: Restrict core PMU bypass to --cputype option Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:31     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  6:13   ` [PATCH v2 02/12] perf test: Truncate test description to fit terminal width Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:24     ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16  6:13   ` [PATCH v2 03/12] perf tests workloads: Support sub-second durations in noploop and thloop Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:22     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  6:13   ` [PATCH v2 04/12] perf tests: Add robust record retry helper and use subsecond workloads Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:27     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  6:13   ` [PATCH v2 05/12] perf tests: Skip metrics validation if system-wide recording lacks permission Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:13   ` [PATCH v2 06/12] perf tests: Fix Python JIT dump profiling test failure Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:27     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  6:13   ` [PATCH v2 07/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in trace record and replay test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:27     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  6:14   ` [PATCH v2 08/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in BPF counters test on hybrid systems Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:14   ` [PATCH v2 09/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in branch stack sampling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:14   ` [PATCH v2 10/12] perf tests: Speed up off-cpu profiling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:25     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  6:14   ` [PATCH v2 11/12] perf tests: Speed up lock contention analysis shell test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16  6:14   ` [PATCH v2 12/12] perf tests: Speed up metrics checking shell tests Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260616062446.583041F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox