From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:54:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616155419.431CA1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616153920.6852-4-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The newly added bounds check only guarantees one 64-bit word per CPU, but the subsequent metadata extraction loop consumes variable-length blocks without enforcing bounds, leading to arbitrary out-of-bounds reads.
--
commit 1a99258ab7b1aa2bd3fbb2be661ac8c232d38a5d
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation
This commit addresses a potential integer overflow and out-of-bounds write in
cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info_full(). It fixes the issue by computing priv_size
early and bounding num_cpu so that it cannot exceed the total number of u64
entries in the event's private data area.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index 0927b0b9c06b1..d121c8f22028d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -3431,6 +3431,18 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info_full(union perf_event *event,
> /* First the global part */
> ptr = (u64 *) auxtrace_info->priv;
> num_cpu = ptr[CS_PMU_TYPE_CPUS] & 0xffffffff;
> +
> + /*
> + * Bound num_cpu by the event size: the global header consumes
> + * CS_ETM_HEADER_SIZE bytes, and each CPU needs at least one u64
> + * metadata entry after that.
> + */
> + priv_size = total_size - event_header_size - INFO_HEADER_SIZE -
> + CS_ETM_HEADER_SIZE;
> + if (num_cpu <= 0 || priv_size <= 0 ||
> + num_cpu > priv_size / (int)sizeof(u64))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the newly added bounds check guarantee
that subsequent accesses in the parsing loop remain within bounds?
The added check only guarantees one 64-bit word per CPU, but each CPU's
metadata block can have a variable length. During the parsing loop:
tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c:cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info_full() {
...
for (int j = 0; j < num_cpu; j++) {
if (ptr[i] == __perf_cs_etmv3_magic) {
metadata[j] = cs_etm__create_meta_blk(ptr, &i, ...);
...
}
The cs_etm__create_meta_blk() function consumes a variable number of elements
without validating bounds against priv_size:
tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c:cs_etm__create_meta_blk() {
...
nr_in_params = buff_in[i + CS_ETM_NR_TRC_PARAMS];
...
*info_read = i + nr_cmn_params + nr_in_params;
...
}
Could this allow a crafted perf.data file to set a large nr_in_params,
causing the shared index i to be incremented past the buffer bounds? On the
next iteration of the loop in cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info_full(), ptr[i]
would then be read out-of-bounds.
The final size validation (i * 8 != priv_size) occurs after the parsing loop
completes, which appears too late to prevent these out-of-bounds reads.
> metadata = zalloc(sizeof(*metadata) * num_cpu);
> if (!metadata)
> return -ENOMEM;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616153920.6852-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 15:39 [PATCHES v5 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf machine: Propagate machine__init() error to callers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf machine: Use snprintf() for guestmount path construction Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf cs-etm: Require full global header in auxtrace_info size check Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf c2c: Free format list entries when c2c_hists__init() fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf c2c: Fix hist entry and format list leaks in c2c_he_free() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf bpf: Validate array presence before casting BPF prog info pointers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 16:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf dso: Set standard errno on decompression failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-16 2:27 [PATCHES v4 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 2:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 2:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:08 [PATCHES v3 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 1:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 1:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 [PATCHES v2 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 21:36 [PATCHES v1 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 21:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616155419.431CA1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox