From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Shivani Nittor" <shivani@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf scripts: Add configurable sorting option to powerpc-hcalls
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:46:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617144642.092BE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617144011.17359-1-shivani@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `--sort` argument value is not validated, leading to silently ignored user intent and misleading output for invalid keys.
--
commit 1aa1f92efbcdcc2ec41737225787d40ac02abf40
Author: Shivani Nittor <shivani@linux.ibm.com>
perf scripts: Add configurable sorting option to powerpc-hcalls
The powerpc-hcalls.py script currently prints hypercall statistics in a
fixed sort order based on the number of hcall occurrences. This patch
adds a --sort option to runtime-configure the sort order (count, min, max, avg).
> diff --git a/tools/perf/scripts/python/powerpc-hcalls.py b/tools/perf/scripts/python/powerpc-hcalls.py
> index 8b78dc790adb1..e5b0c1bee65fb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/scripts/python/powerpc-hcalls.py
> +++ b/tools/perf/scripts/python/powerpc-hcalls.py
[ ... ]
> @@ -158,10 +159,45 @@ def hcall_table_lookup(opcode):
>
> print_ptrn = '%-28s%10s%10s%10s%10s'
>
> +def sort_output(opcode):
> + stats = output[opcode]
> +
> + if sort_key == 'min':
> + return stats['min']
> + if sort_key == 'max':
> + return stats['max']
> + if sort_key == 'avg':
> + return stats['time'] // stats['cnt']
> +
> + return stats['cnt']
> +
> +def trace_begin():
> + global sort_key
> +
> + i = 1
> + while i < len(sys.argv):
> + arg = sys.argv[i]
> +
> + if arg == '-s' or arg == '--sort':
> + if i + 1 >= len(sys.argv):
> + print("Error: -s/--sort requires a sort key argument")
> + sys.exit(1)
> + sort_key = sys.argv[i + 1]
> + i += 2
> + continue
> +
> + if arg.startswith('--sort='):
> + sort_key = arg.split('=', 1)[1]
> +
> + i += 1
> +
> + print("SORT KEY =", sort_key)
[Severity: Medium]
Will this result in silently falling back to sorting by count if an invalid
sort key is provided?
If a user runs the script with an invalid sort option like --sort=latency,
trace_begin() will assign it to sort_key and print "SORT KEY = latency".
Then in sort_output(), it will fall through the conditionals and return
stats['cnt'], leaving the user with output sorted by count despite the
printed sort key.
Could we add validation for the sort_key argument to error out if it isn't
one of the expected values (count, min, max, avg)?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617144011.17359-1-shivani@linux.ibm.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 14:40 [PATCH v2] perf scripts: Add configurable sorting option to powerpc-hcalls Shivani Nittor
2026-06-17 14:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617144642.092BE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shivani@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox