From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Leo Yan" <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] perf cs-etm: Support call indentation
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 21:20:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617212025.E49EA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617-b4-arm_cs_callchain_support_v1-v10-7-e8b6e5d63db5@arm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Unnecessary allocation and tracking of branch stacks when only thread stack is requested.
--
commit 169dda630ecfdc4196986b24719c6d9bd8a72971
Author: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
perf cs-etm: Support call indentation
The perf script callindent is derived from call stack in thread context.
This commit enables thread-stack when either itrace thread-stack support or
last branch entries are requested, and feeds taken branches to
thread_stack__event().
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index e43f0c1dd0078..30536b919af73 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -638,7 +640,7 @@ static int cs_etm__init_traceid_queue(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> if (!tidq->prev_packet)
> goto out_free;
>
> - if (etm->synth_opts.last_branch) {
> + if (etm->use_thread_stack) {
> size_t sz = sizeof(struct branch_stack);
>
> sz += etm->synth_opts.last_branch_sz *
[Severity: Medium]
Does this code unnecessarily allocate and track branch stacks when only the
thread stack is requested?
By changing this condition from etm->synth_opts.last_branch to
etm->use_thread_stack, it appears tidq->last_branch will be allocated and
tidq->br_stack_sz set to a non-zero value even when the user only
requests thread stacks.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1563,7 +1565,8 @@ static void cs_etm__add_stack_event(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> /* Enable callchain so thread stack entry can be allocated */
> thread_stack__event(tidq->frontend_thread, tidq->prev_packet->cpu,
> tidq->prev_packet->flags, from, to, size,
> - etmq->buffer->buffer_nr + 1, false,
> + etmq->buffer->buffer_nr + 1,
> + etmq->etm->use_callchain,
> tidq->br_stack_sz, 0);
> } else {
[Severity: Medium]
Because tidq->br_stack_sz is now non-zero, this feeds into
thread_stack__event() and forces the thread stack subsystem to allocate an
internal branch ring buffer and update it on every taken branch.
Since etm->synth_opts.last_branch is false, isn't this tracked branch stack
completely ignored later, resulting in unnecessary memory allocation and CPU
overhead during trace decoding?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617-b4-arm_cs_callchain_support_v1-v10-0-e8b6e5d63db5@arm.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 15:08 [PATCH v10 0/9] perf cs-etm: Support thread stack and callchain Leo Yan
2026-06-17 15:08 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] perf cs-etm: Fix thread leaks on trace queue init failure Leo Yan
2026-06-17 20:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 15:08 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] perf cs-etm: Filter synthesized branch samples Leo Yan
2026-06-17 15:08 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] perf cs-etm: Decode ETE exception packets Leo Yan
2026-06-17 15:08 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] perf cs-etm: Refactor instruction size handling Leo Yan
2026-06-17 15:08 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] perf cs-etm: Use thread-stack for last branch entries Leo Yan
2026-06-17 20:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 15:08 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] perf cs-etm: Flush thread stacks after decoder reset Leo Yan
2026-06-17 21:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 15:08 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] perf cs-etm: Support call indentation Leo Yan
2026-06-17 21:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-17 15:08 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] perf cs-etm: Synthesize callchains for instruction samples Leo Yan
2026-06-17 21:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 15:09 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] perf test: Add Arm CoreSight callchain test Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617212025.E49EA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox