From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dmitry Ilvokhin" <d@ilvokhin.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf record: Avoid overrunning the zstd output buffer
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 16:20:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618162059.8B59B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7860259ac13e539dfb907489be29d0487d36aeb8.1781797544.git.d@ilvokhin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The patch introduces an overly strict buffer size check that causes compression to fail prematurely whenever less than `max_record_size` (~64KB) space remains.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The safety bounds check added to `zstd_compress_stream_to_records` is bypassed on the first loop iteration, leaving the buffer vulnerable to overflow and integer underflow.
- [High] In `zstd_decompress_stream()`, the `output.dst` pointer is advanced while `output.pos` is improperly preserved, leading to out-of-bounds writes and corrupted output if the decompression loop executes more than once.
- [High] If `perf_mmap__push` processes the ring buffer in two chunks and the second chunk's compression fails, the reference to `map->core` acquired during the first chunk is leaked.
--
commit 09f418a2fa19ace0234b4443e193f65fb347ed8b
Author: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
perf record: Avoid overrunning the zstd output buffer
This commit adds a bounds check in zstd_compress_stream_to_records() to
prevent writing past the end of the output buffer. It verifies if the
remaining buffer size is sufficient for a full record.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/zstd.c b/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
> index 1955fa2431d17..a0f6572ad2017 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -53,8 +53,14 @@ ssize_t zstd_compress_stream_to_records(struct zstd_data *data, void *dst, size_
> }
>
> while (input.pos < input.size) {
> + if (hdr_size &&
> + dst_size < hdr_size + max_record_size + sizeof(u64)) {
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but by gating the bounds check on
hdr_size, isn't the check bypassed on the very first loop iteration since
hdr_size is initialized to 0?
If dst_size is initially very small (which can legitimately happen in
record__aio_pushfn() when calculating mmap__mmap_len(map) - aio->size), the
code will unconditionally write the header and decrement dst_size.
Could this underflow dst_size to a massive positive value, bypassing
subsequent bounds checks and allowing ZSTD_compressStream() to write out of
bounds?
[Severity: High]
Does this check introduce an overly strict requirement that causes compression
to fail prematurely?
By requiring dst_size < hdr_size + max_record_size + sizeof(u64), this
condition unconditionally fails compression if the remaining buffer is less
than the maximum record size (typically ~64KB).
In AIO mode, dst_size represents the remaining space in the AIO buffer, which
naturally dwindles. If a small chunk needs to be compressed and could fit in
the remaining space, wouldn't this check spuriously abort the compression and
render the last ~64KB of every buffer unusable?
> + pr_err("failed to compress: output buffer too small\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> record = dst;
> size = process_header(record, 0);
> + hdr_size = size;
> compressed += size;
> dst += size;
> dst_size -= size;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at
zstd_decompress_stream() in the same file, is there an issue with how
output.pos is handled?
tools/perf/util/zstd.c:zstd_decompress_stream() {
...
output.dst = dst + output.pos;
output.size = dst_size - output.pos;
...
}
The loop advances the destination pointer but fails to clear output.pos.
If the decompression loop executes more than once, will ZSTD start writing
at the new output.dst + output.pos, effectively skipping output.pos bytes
and corrupting the decompressed stream?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the strict bounds check
introduced above make a memory leak in AIO mode more easily triggerable?
In tools/perf/builtin-record.c:record__aio_pushfn(), a reference to map->core
is acquired on the first successful chunk:
tools/perf/builtin-record.c:record__aio_pushfn() {
...
if (!aio->size) {
perf_mmap__get(&map->core);
}
...
}
If perf_mmap__push() processes the ring buffer in two chunks, and the
second chunk's compression fails (which happens more frequently now due
to the ~64KB bounds check), perf_mmap__push() aborts and passes the error
back to record__aio_push():
tools/perf/builtin-record.c:record__aio_push() {
...
ret = perf_mmap__push(map, &aio, record__aio_pushfn);
if (ret != 0)
return ret;
...
}
Will this return immediately on failure and bypass the perf_mmap__put()
cleanup that occurs later, resulting in a leak of the map->core resource?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1781797544.git.d@ilvokhin.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-18 15:59 [PATCH 0/3] perf record: fix multi-record Zstd compression Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-18 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf record: Fix multiple PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED2 records per push Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-18 16:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf record: Avoid overrunning the zstd output buffer Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-18 16:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-18 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf record: Don't store raw data on zstd compression failure Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-18 16:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260618162059.8B59B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox