From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
james.clark@linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
mike.leach@arm.com, leo.yan@arm.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] perf: Fix perf_addr_filters_afjust()
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:32:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260622123245.GS48970@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
- adjust lock order; since perf_event_addr_filters_apply() takes mmap_lock
inside child_mutex.
- note that perf_event_mmap() is called by the thread doing the
mmap()/mprotect()/.. operation, but not the other threads in the address
space that might have inherited the same event.
- have perf_addr_filters_adjust() iterate the child_list to find all other
events for tasks that have the same mm.
- since this can now adjust addr_filter_ranges[] for remote events, make sure
to adjust things while holding ctx->lock; local_irq_disable() as implied by
the ifh->lock is no longer suffient to serialize against event scheduling.
- per the previous locking order; perf_event_mmap(), which is called holding
mmap_lock, cannot take child_mutex, as such, make child_list RCU protected
and iterate under RCU.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1454,10 +1454,11 @@ static void put_ctx(struct perf_event_co
* perf_event_context::mutex
* perf_event::child_mutex;
* perf_event_context::lock
- * mmap_lock
- * perf_event::mmap_mutex
- * perf_buffer::aux_mutex
- * perf_addr_filters_head::lock
+ * perf_addr_filters_head::lock
+ * mmap_lock
+ * perf_event::mmap_mutex
+ * perf_buffer::aux_mutex
+ * perf_addr_filters_head::lock
*
* cpu_hotplug_lock
* pmus_lock
@@ -2429,7 +2430,7 @@ static void perf_child_detach(struct per
lockdep_assert_held(&parent_event->child_mutex);
*/
- list_del_init(&event->child_list);
+ list_del_rcu(&event->child_list);
}
static bool is_orphaned_event(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -9902,35 +9903,64 @@ static bool perf_addr_filter_vma_adjust(
return true;
}
-static void __perf_addr_filters_adjust(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
+static int perf_child_addr_filters_adjust(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
struct perf_addr_filters_head *ifh = perf_event_addr_filters(event);
- struct vm_area_struct *vma = data;
- struct perf_addr_filter *filter;
unsigned int restart = 0, count = 0;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- if (!has_addr_filter(event))
- return;
+ struct perf_addr_filter *filter;
- if (!vma->vm_file)
- return;
+ guard(raw_spinlock)(&ifh->lock);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ifh->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(filter, &ifh->list, entry) {
if (perf_addr_filter_vma_adjust(filter, vma,
&event->addr_filter_ranges[count]))
restart++;
count++;
+
}
if (restart)
event->addr_filters_gen++;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ifh->lock, flags);
- if (restart)
- perf_event_stop(event, 1);
+ return restart;
+}
+
+static void __perf_addr_filters_adjust(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
+{
+ struct perf_event *child, *parent = event->parent ?: event;
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma = data;
+
+ if (!has_addr_filter(event))
+ return;
+
+ if (!vma->vm_file)
+ return;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(child, &parent->child_list, child_list) {
+ struct perf_event_context *ctx;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ int restart = 0;
+
+again:
+ ctx = READ_ONCE(child->ctx);
+ scoped_guard (raw_spinlock_irqsave, &ctx->lock) {
+ if (child->ctx != ctx)
+ goto again;
+
+ task = ctx->task;
+ if (!task || task == TASK_TOMBSTONE)
+ continue;
+
+ if (vma->vm_mm != task->mm)
+ continue;
+
+ restart = perf_child_addr_filters_adjust(child, vma);
+ }
+ if (restart)
+ perf_event_stop(child, 1);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -9947,11 +9977,10 @@ static void perf_addr_filters_adjust(str
if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
return;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ guard(rcu)();
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_iterate_ctx(ctx, __perf_addr_filters_adjust, vma, true);
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
void perf_event_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-22 12:32 Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-22 12:53 ` [RFC][PATCH] perf: Fix perf_addr_filters_afjust() sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260622123245.GS48970@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox