From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf kvm: Factor out kvm_need_default_arch_event()
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 07:16:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623071641.61C2F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623070313.55225-2-namhyung@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] `__cmd_top()` unconditionally appends the default architecture event, breaking user-provided event overrides.
- [Low] Missing explicit POSIX <stdlib.h> header inclusion in kvm-stat.c for calloc() and free().
--
commit 3e2018b99366e21f6651143f8ed90e3f8257ec72
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
perf kvm: Factor out kvm_need_default_arch_event()
This commit factors out the logic for checking existing event command line
options into a generic kvm_need_default_arch_event() function. It removes the
duplicated option checking logic from architecture-specific implementations
of kvm_add_default_arch_event() and updates __cmd_record() to use the new
guard.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> index 0c5e6b3aac74d..c236093eac473 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> @@ -2015,9 +2015,11 @@ static int __cmd_record(const char *file_name, int argc, const char **argv)
>
> BUG_ON(i + 2 != rec_argc);
>
> - ret = kvm_add_default_arch_event(EM_HOST, &i, rec_argv);
> - if (ret)
> - goto EXIT;
> + if (kvm_need_default_arch_event(argc, argv)) {
> + ret = kvm_add_default_arch_event(EM_HOST, &i, rec_argv);
> + if (ret)
> + goto EXIT;
> + }
>
> ret = cmd_record(i, rec_argv);
>
[Severity: High]
Is it possible that __cmd_top() is missing the kvm_need_default_arch_event()
guard?
Since the option parsing logic was removed from kvm_add_default_arch_event(),
it now unconditionally appends the default event.
__cmd_top() in tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c still calls it unconditionally:
__cmd_top()
...
ret = kvm_add_default_arch_event(EM_HOST, &i, rec_argv);
if (ret)
goto EXIT;
Will this cause perf kvm top to ignore user-provided event overrides
(like -e some_event) and blindly append the default event?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/kvm-stat.c b/tools/perf/util/kvm-stat.c
> index 27f16810498ca..dd599dd0e4322 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/kvm-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/kvm-stat.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -271,3 +272,29 @@ int kvm_add_default_arch_event(uint16_t e_machine, int *argc, const char **argv)
> return 0;
> }
> }
> +
> +bool kvm_need_default_arch_event(int argc, const char **argv)
> +{
> + const char **tmp_argv;
> + bool event = false;
> + int i;
> +
> + const struct option event_options[] = {
> + OPT_BOOLEAN('e', "event", &event, NULL),
> + OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "pfm-events", &event, NULL),
> + OPT_END()
> + };
> +
> + /* parse_options() may change the argv, let's make a copy */
> + tmp_argv = calloc(argc + 1, sizeof(char *));
[Severity: Low]
Should we explicitly include <stdlib.h> in this file to support musl libc
builds?
The new kvm_need_default_arch_event() function relies on calloc() and free(),
but <stdlib.h> isn't explicitly included in tools/perf/util/kvm-stat.c.
Because musl libc enforces strict standard header separation, relying on
implicit includes can cause the build to fail.
> + if (!tmp_argv)
> + return false;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
> + tmp_argv[i] = argv[i];
> +
> + parse_options(argc, tmp_argv, event_options, NULL, PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN);
> + free(tmp_argv);
> +
> + return !event;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623070313.55225-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 7:03 [PATCH v1 0/4] perf kvm: A small update in default arch event Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf kvm: Factor out kvm_need_default_arch_event() Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 7:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf kvm: Check kvm_need_default_arch_event() early Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 7:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf kvm: Kill STRDUP_FAIL_EXIT() Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 7:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf test: Simplify perf kvm record/report tests Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:09 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623071641.61C2F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox