Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ivan Lazaric" <ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf stat: reject --field-separator and --json-output combination
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:36:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708133656.107611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708131359.71732-3-ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Missing explicit inclusion of `<stdio.h>` for standard I/O functions and types.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] perf stat: reject --field-separator and --json-output combination ---
commit 14ca4ce3700a93ed48a3336a633292f7e45ae462
Author: Ivan Lazaric <ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com>

perf stat: reject --field-separator and --json-output combination

This patch explicitly rejects using both the --field-separator and
--json-output options in perf stat. It adds a check to output an error
message and exit cleanly, preventing malformed mixed formats.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index a04466ea3b0a0..6ec82752d71c6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -2643,6 +2643,13 @@ int cmd_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
>  
>  	stat_config.aggr_mode = opt_aggr_mode_to_aggr_mode(&opt_mode);
>  
> +	if (stat_config.csv_sep && stat_config.json_output) {
> +		fprintf(stderr, "cannot use both --field-separator and --json-output\n");
                ^^^^^^^

[Severity: Low]
Could this cause a build failure when compiling perf with musl libc?

While glibc often implicitly includes standard headers, musl has stricter
header separation.

Since this code introduces a new call to fprintf and uses stderr, does
builtin-stat.c need an explicit #include <stdio.h> in its global includes
block to guarantee musl compatibility?

> +		parse_options_usage(stat_usage, stat_options, "x", 1);
> +		parse_options_usage(NULL, stat_options, "j", 1);
> +		goto out;
> +	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708131359.71732-3-ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-05  0:58 [PATCH] perf stat: reject --field-separator and --json-output combination Ivan Lazaric
2026-07-08  6:21 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-08 13:14   ` [PATCH v2] " Ivan Lazaric
2026-07-08 13:36     ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 23:43       ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10  0:41     ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708133656.107611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox