From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ivan Lazaric" <ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf stat: reject --field-separator and --json-output combination
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:36:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708133656.107611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708131359.71732-3-ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Missing explicit inclusion of `<stdio.h>` for standard I/O functions and types.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] perf stat: reject --field-separator and --json-output combination ---
commit 14ca4ce3700a93ed48a3336a633292f7e45ae462
Author: Ivan Lazaric <ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com>
perf stat: reject --field-separator and --json-output combination
This patch explicitly rejects using both the --field-separator and
--json-output options in perf stat. It adds a check to output an error
message and exit cleanly, preventing malformed mixed formats.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index a04466ea3b0a0..6ec82752d71c6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -2643,6 +2643,13 @@ int cmd_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
>
> stat_config.aggr_mode = opt_aggr_mode_to_aggr_mode(&opt_mode);
>
> + if (stat_config.csv_sep && stat_config.json_output) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "cannot use both --field-separator and --json-output\n");
^^^^^^^
[Severity: Low]
Could this cause a build failure when compiling perf with musl libc?
While glibc often implicitly includes standard headers, musl has stricter
header separation.
Since this code introduces a new call to fprintf and uses stderr, does
builtin-stat.c need an explicit #include <stdio.h> in its global includes
block to guarantee musl compatibility?
> + parse_options_usage(stat_usage, stat_options, "x", 1);
> + parse_options_usage(NULL, stat_options, "j", 1);
> + goto out;
> + }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708131359.71732-3-ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-05 0:58 [PATCH] perf stat: reject --field-separator and --json-output combination Ivan Lazaric
2026-07-08 6:21 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Ivan Lazaric
2026-07-08 13:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 23:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 0:41 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708133656.107611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ivan.lazaric1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox