From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dmitry Ilvokhin" <d@ilvokhin.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf record: Return the written size from process_comp_header()
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:54:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708135414.6DC691F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a23dffc110b0e0ead7120fcbbef57b8e6c0b8a6.1783513665.git.d@ilvokhin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] When a large buffer is split into multiple compressed records, `record__pushfn` overwrites the first record's header size with the total compressed size, corrupting the stream and causing integer truncation.
- [Medium] The `process_comp_header` function fails to initialize `event->data_size` and does not pad `PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED2` records to an 8-byte boundary, leading to an uninitialized heap memory disclosure.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf record: Return the written size from process_comp_header() ---
commit a7fcd622c85922789abb8c299306610b9ac81440
Author: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
perf record: Return the written size from process_comp_header()
This commit modifies process_comp_header() to take the remaining destination
space and return the bytes written or -1 if the header won't fit. The bounds
checking is now handled directly by the header processing function rather than
the loop in zstd_compress_stream_to_records().
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1591,16 +1591,25 @@ static void record__adjust_affinity(struct record *rec, struct mmap *map)
> }
> }
>
> -static size_t process_comp_header(void *record, size_t increment)
> +/*
> + * Called once with data_size == 0 to start a record, then once with
> + * data_size == compressed payload size to finalize.
> + * Returns the bytes written, or -1 if it won't fit.
> + */
> +static ssize_t process_comp_header(void *record, size_t dst_size,
> + size_t data_size)
> {
> struct perf_record_compressed2 *event = record;
> size_t size = sizeof(*event);
>
> - if (increment) {
> - event->header.size += increment;
> - return increment;
> + if (data_size) {
> + event->header.size += data_size;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> + if (size > dst_size)
> + return -1;
> +
> event->header.type = PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED2;
> event->header.size = size;
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does process_comp_header() leave
event->data_size uninitialized here?
If called from AIO mode via record__aio_pushfn(), the map->aio.data memory
could be allocated via malloc() and reused without zeroing.
Since event->data_size isn't set and the record isn't padded to an 8-byte
boundary, this could write uninitialized heap memory to the perf.data file
and break ZSTD decompression.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/zstd.c b/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
> --- a/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -55,12 +57,9 @@ ssize_t zstd_compress_stream_to_records(struct zstd_data *data, void *dst, size_
>
> while (input.pos < input.size) {
> record = dst;
> - /* process_header writes the event header into record */
> - if (dst_size < sizeof(struct perf_event_header))
> - goto reset;
> - size = process_header(record, 0);
> + size = process_header(record, dst_size, 0);
> /* Output buffer full — cannot fit even the record header */
> - if (size > dst_size)
> + if (size < 0)
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but when zstd_compress_stream_to_records()
splits large outputs into multiple records, doesn't returning the total
compressed size cause issues in the caller?
Looking at record__pushfn() in tools/perf/builtin-record.c, the caller seems
to assume a single record was produced and overwrites the first record's
header size:
event->data_size = compressed - sizeof(struct perf_record_compressed2);
event->header.size = PERF_ALIGN(compressed, sizeof(u64));
padding = event->header.size - compressed;
Since header.size is a u16, if a chunk produces more than 65535 bytes,
this would silently truncate the value.
This would cause the padding calculation to underflow into an enormous size_t
value, and record__write() would attempt to write exabytes of zero padding to
disk.
Even without truncation, overwriting the first header would cause the
decompressor to treat subsequent intermediate headers as ZSTD payload.
> goto reset;
> compressed += size;
> dst += size;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1783513665.git.d@ilvokhin.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 13:38 [PATCH v3 0/2] perf record: fix multi-record Zstd compression Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-07-08 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf record: Return the written size from process_comp_header() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-07-08 13:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf record: Fix multiple PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED2 records per push Dmitry Ilvokhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708135414.6DC691F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox