From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf record: Fix teardown hang on system-wide multi-threaded sessions
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 05:56:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710055620.3B0FC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710053927.1864021-1-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch unconditionally skips `fdarray_flag__nonfilterable` file descriptors in `fdarray__filter()`, causing a memory leak of `perf_mmap` references and an infinite busy loop if a system-wide event or other nonfilterable file descriptor receives an error (e.g., POLLERR, POLLHUP).
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf record: Fix teardown hang on system-wide multi-threaded sessions ---
commit 6940fed42e3ec7ba75ed80d3ab8c1cc4f0aad35d
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf record: Fix teardown hang on system-wide multi-threaded sessions
This patch attempts to resolve a hang during teardown in system-wide streaming
mode by adding explicit evlist disables. It also modifies the fdarray filter
logic to bypass nonfilterable file descriptors when processing POLLHUP signals.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> index f0f195207fca9..3bfcd2aa7c07f 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ int fdarray__filter(struct fdarray *fda, short revents,
> return 0;
>
> for (fd = 0; fd < fda->nr; ++fd) {
> + if (fda->priv[fd].flags & fdarray_flag__nonfilterable)
> + continue;
> +
[Severity: High]
Does skipping the filter logic for non-filterable file descriptors here cause
an infinite poll loop if a system-wide event receives an error?
In tools/lib/perf/evlist.c:mmap_per_evsel(), system-wide event file
descriptors are marked with fdarray_flag__nonfilterable:
flgs = evsel->system_wide ? fdarray_flag__nonfilterable : fdarray_flag__default;
If one of these file descriptors encounters an error like POLLERR or POLLHUP,
it seems this new continue statement bypasses the block that clears the events
mask and invokes the entry_destructor.
Could this cause poll() to continuously return immediately with the same
error, leading to a CPU busy loop and leaking perf_mmap references since the
destructor is skipped?
> if (!fda->entries[fd].events)
> continue;
>
> @@ -126,8 +129,7 @@ int fdarray__filter(struct fdarray *fda, short revents,
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (!(fda->priv[fd].flags & fdarray_flag__nonfilterable))
> - ++nr;
> + ++nr;
> }
>
> return nr;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710053927.1864021-1-irogers@google.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 5:39 [PATCH v1 1/2] perf record: Fix teardown hang on system-wide multi-threaded sessions Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:39 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] perf cap: If capability is missing still perform root test Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 22:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 5:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-10 22:02 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] perf record: Fix teardown hang on system-wide multi-threaded sessions Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710055620.3B0FC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox