From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] perf synthetic-events: Fix line synchronization, bounds, and truncation bugs in proc maps reader
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:08:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720180829.7AAB71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720175455.3645946-3-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Error recovery via `io__drain_line()` incorrectly consumes and discards the next valid map entry if a parsing failure occurs due to a premature newline character.
- [Medium] The PERF_RECORD_MISC_PROC_MAP_PARSE_TIMEOUT flag is silently dropped if the truncation timeout triggers on a map entry that fails the PROT_EXEC/mmap_data filters.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v1 2/4] perf synthetic-events: Fix line synchronization, bounds, and truncation bugs in proc maps reader ---
commit 21e332ccbb14a1f50a59ea36a8f2a24a05ff7df8
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf synthetic-events: Fix line synchronization, bounds, and truncation bugs in proc maps reader
This commit addresses logic and boundary bugs in read_proc_maps_line() and its
caller. It ensures that mid-line parsing failures invoke io__drain_line() to
preserve synchronization and replaces truncation bugs with a standard fallback
literal.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c b/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
> index 5307d707711d8..723b7323c06d9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
> @@ -291,6 +291,15 @@ static int perf_event__synthesize_fork(const struct perf_tool *tool,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void io__drain_line(struct io *io)
> +{
> + int ch;
> +
> + do {
> + ch = io__get_char(io);
> + } while (ch >= 0 && ch != '\n');
> +}
> +
> static bool read_proc_maps_line(struct io *io, __u64 *start, __u64 *end,
> u32 *prot, u32 *flags, __u64 *offset,
> u32 *maj, u32 *min,
> @@ -299,69 +308,121 @@ static bool read_proc_maps_line(struct io *io, __u64 *start, __u64 *end,
> {
> __u64 temp;
> int ch;
> - char *start_pathname = pathname;
> + size_t written = 0;
> + bool overflowed = false;
>
> - if (io__get_hex(io, start) != '-')
> + if (io__get_hex(io, start) != '-') {
> + if (!io->eof)
> + io__drain_line(io);
[Severity: High]
If a parser like io__get_hex() or io__get_char() fails because it encounters a
premature newline character, does calling io__drain_line() here unintentionally
consume and discard the next valid map entry?
Since the newline character for the malformed line would have already been
consumed by the parser, it appears io__drain_line() might read until the end
of the subsequent line, causing it to be skipped.
> + return false;
> + }
[ ... ]
> @@ -487,50 +544,64 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events(const struct perf_tool *tool,
[ ... ]
> - if ((event->mmap2.prot & PROT_EXEC) == 0) {
> - if (!mmap_data || (event->mmap2.prot & PROT_READ) == 0)
> + if ((prot & PROT_EXEC) == 0) {
> + if (!mmap_data || (prot & PROT_READ) == 0) {
> + if (truncation)
> + break;
[Severity: Medium]
When the truncation timeout triggers on a map entry that fails the PROT_EXEC
or mmap_data filters, does this break prevent the timeout flag
(PERF_RECORD_MISC_PROC_MAP_PARSE_TIMEOUT) from being set and emitted?
By breaking out of the loop early here, it seems the code bypasses both the
PERF_RECORD_MISC_PROC_MAP_PARSE_TIMEOUT assignment and the call to
perf_tool__process_synth_event(), which might leave analysis tools unaware
that the data stream was truncated.
> continue;
> + }
>
> event->header.misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_MMAP_DATA;
> }
>
> -out:
> if (truncation)
> event->header.misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_PROC_MAP_PARSE_TIMEOUT;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720175455.3645946-1-irogers@google.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 17:54 [PATCH v1 0/4] perf: Fix and optimize maps parsing, boundaries, and bounds safety Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 17:54 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] perf find-map: Remove PATH_MAX 128-byte stack array restriction Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 18:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:54 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] perf synthetic-events: Fix line synchronization, bounds, and truncation bugs in proc maps reader Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 18:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-20 17:54 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] perf synthetic-events: Fix bounds, stale state, and misc flags in kernel module synthesis Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 17:54 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] perf synthetic-events: Fix bounds and union member access in mmap2 build_id synthesis Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 18:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 22:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: Fix and optimize maps parsing, boundaries, and bounds safety Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 22:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf find-map: Remove PATH_MAX 128-byte stack array restriction Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 22:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf synthetic-events: Fix line synchronization, bounds, and truncation bugs in proc maps reader Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 22:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf synthetic-events: Fix bounds, stale state, and misc flags in kernel module synthesis Ian Rogers
2026-07-20 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf synthetic-events: Fix bounds and union member access in mmap2 build_id synthesis Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720180829.7AAB71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox