Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v10 09/23] perf/x86/intel: Centralize PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS updates
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:24:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721062506.3745816-10-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721062506.3745816-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS is currently updated in multiple paths:
intel_ds_pebs_init() and __intel_update_pmu_caps() for adaptive and
architectural PEBS. This split makes the capability flow harder to
reason about and is awkward for upcoming XSAVES-based SIMD register
sampling, which also needs consistent capability setup and validation.

Refactor the update logic into a single helper,
__intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(), so adaptive and architectural PEBS
share one implementation.

Call this helper from intel_update_pmu_caps() to keep PMU capability
handling centralized in one place and avoid duplicated or conflicting
updates.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c   |  1 -
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index ee62b24d3fdf..aecaa109c31e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -6187,11 +6187,14 @@ static inline bool intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap(void)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline void __intel_update_pmu_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
+static inline void __intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
 	struct pmu *dest_pmu = pmu ? pmu : x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id());
+	u64 caps = hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).caps;
 
-	if (hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).caps & ARCH_PEBS_VECR_XMM)
+	if ((x86_pmu.arch_pebs && (caps & ARCH_PEBS_VECR_XMM)) ||
+	    (!x86_pmu.arch_pebs && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 4 &&
+	     x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline))
 		dest_pmu->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS;
 }
 
@@ -6263,12 +6266,10 @@ static void update_pmu_cap_from_perfmonext(struct pmu *pmu)
 		hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).counters = pebs_mask;
 		hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).pdists = pdists_mask;
 
-		if (WARN_ON((pebs_mask | pdists_mask) & ~cntrs_mask)) {
+		if (WARN_ON((pebs_mask | pdists_mask) & ~cntrs_mask))
 			x86_pmu.arch_pebs = 0;
-		} else {
-			__intel_update_pmu_caps(pmu);
+		else
 			__intel_update_large_pebs_flags(pmu);
-		}
 	} else {
 		WARN_ON(x86_pmu.arch_pebs == 1);
 		x86_pmu.arch_pebs = 0;
@@ -6292,6 +6293,7 @@ static void intel_update_pmu_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
 		    hybrid_pmu(pmu)->pmu_type == hybrid_big)
 			hybrid(pmu, intel_cap).perf_metrics = 1;
 	}
+	__intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(pmu);
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
@@ -6445,8 +6447,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 		}
 	}
 
-	__intel_update_pmu_caps(cpuc->pmu);
-
 	if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
 		return;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 9355744a9258..d50d9de6c17f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -3389,7 +3389,6 @@ static void __init intel_ds_pebs_init(void)
 				x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL;
 				x86_pmu.pebs_capable = ~0ULL;
 				pebs_qual = "-baseline";
-				x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS;
 			} else {
 				/* Only basic record supported */
 				x86_pmu.large_pebs_flags &=
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-21  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-21  6:24 [Patch v10 00/23] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 01/23] perf/x86: Move hybrid PMU initialization before x86_pmu_starting_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 02/23] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 03/23] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 04/23] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific function definitions Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 05/23] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in NMI handlers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 06/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 07/23] x86/fpu: Add update_fpu_state_and_flag() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 08/23] perf: Move and enhance has_extended_regs() for arch-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 10/23] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for non-PEBS events Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 11/23] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 12/23] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 13/23] perf/x86: Support XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 14/23] perf/x86: Support YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 15/23] perf/x86: Support ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:24 ` [Patch v10 16/23] perf/x86: Support OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:25 ` [Patch v10 17/23] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:25 ` [Patch v10 18/23] perf/x86: Support eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:25 ` [Patch v10 19/23] perf/x86: Support SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:25 ` [Patch v10 20/23] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:25 ` [Patch v10 21/23] perf/x86/intel: Advertise PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:25 ` [Patch v10 22/23] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21  6:25 ` [Patch v10 23/23] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS record/fragment size Dapeng Mi
2026-07-21 17:42 ` [Patch v10 00/23] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260721062506.3745816-10-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox