From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] perf/cxl: Program the requested event group on configurable counters
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:38:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731233841.B68851F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731232827.401447-2-dave.jiang@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Counter configuration fields are not cleared before being modified in cxl_pmu_event_start(), causing corrupted event group IDs when a counter is reused.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/9] perf/cxl: Program the requested event group on configurable counters ---
commit 8ade5d557a8fda7df4834e1f36fcc4dfd34e953d
Author: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
perf/cxl: Program the requested event group on configurable counters
cxl_pmu_get_event_idx() sets *counter_idx for a configurable counter but
never *event_idx. hwc->event_base stays 0, so cxl_pmu_event_start()
programs event group 0 no matter which group the user asked for.
Return the matched capability's event_idx.
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715191454.459673-1-dave@stgolabs.net?part=1
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
> index 68a54d97d2a8a..ff01b658e1b45 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -541,7 +544,7 @@ static int cxl_pmu_get_event_idx(struct perf_event *event, int *counter_idx,
>
> pmu_ev = cxl_pmu_find_config_counter_ev_cap(info, vid, gid, mask);
> if (!IS_ERR(pmu_ev)) {
> - if (!counter_idx)
> + if (!counter_idx || !event_idx)
> return 0;
>
> bitmap_andnot(configurable_and_free, info->conf_counter_bm,
> @@ -552,6 +555,7 @@ static int cxl_pmu_get_event_idx(struct perf_event *event, int *counter_idx,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> *counter_idx = i;
> + *event_idx = pmu_ev->event_idx;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this corrupt the hardware counter configuration when a counter is reused?
By populating event_idx here, hwc->event_base will now contain the actual
event group ID rather than 0.
However, in cxl_pmu_event_start(), the configuration is updated using a
read-modify-write without clearing the previous fields:
drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c:cxl_pmu_event_start() {
...
cfg = readq(base + CXL_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_REG(hwc->idx));
...
if (test_bit(hwc->idx, info->conf_counter_bm)) {
cfg |= FIELD_PREP(CXL_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_EVENT_GRP_ID_IDX_MSK,
hwc->event_base);
cfg |= FIELD_PREP(CXL_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_EVENTS_MSK,
cxl_pmu_config_get_mask(event));
}
...
writeq(cfg, base + CXL_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_REG(hwc->idx));
}
If a counter is freed and reused for a new event with a different event group
ID, won't the bitwise OR merge the old and new event_base values since the
CXL_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_EVENT_GRP_ID_IDX_MSK bits are never cleared from cfg?
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731232827.401447-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 23:28 [PATCH v3 0/9] perf/cxlpmu: Misc sashiko raised issues fixes Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] perf/cxl: Program the requested event group on configurable counters Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] perf/cxl: Clear stale event fields before reprogramming a counter Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] perf/cxl: Fix the counter overflow delta fixup Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] perf/cxl: Split the MSI vector out of info->irq Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] perf/cxl: Accept an overflow interrupt on MSI message number 0 Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] perf/cxl: Don't share the overflow interrupt, and keep it pinned Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] perf/cxl: Unfreeze counters after handling an overflow interrupt Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] perf/cxl: Validate the hardware-reported counter width Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] perf/cxl: Don't log through pmu.dev in the overflow interrupt handler Dave Jiang
2026-07-31 23:46 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731233841.B68851F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox