From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F021C392C48; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 06:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785909970; cv=none; b=O9hkB0WbzJuETQoFPcTkxu7w2g9s54dQp04EF/ybl7z1QI8/yDN8EC9AZyYe+nOEr4wEjdPi2zYCbqzGQUSAJ7zwcT9E/lemZxoL/owhphg3DuxZ5jtRlGA2h611lp/qZuqfc5H1fhtv2ROIWFdfdyCl6XUx3rv8NukYgxQ0Omo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785909970; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5oFi6vDgDlDW79e3iQla5VdnXVrIW/ZY2sHtpIEfOyc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=jaqRw6o2ombfs+tIUHI+PFdpUjSctBMlYO3p1PhmbUhRMbiQ5ztovfIdV/mP6M40JNg/3PGErdso0ZqAFm+IlIoNl4B/8ilT4Be1fcXtUoXwqe00cjjGzqtv/7AoeO5pmM+Bp+9KA+HN+OxWl5vL/YsAbcLv8IMYiXKd6maUyRw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hwKt9IFf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hwKt9IFf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1785909970; x=1817445970; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5oFi6vDgDlDW79e3iQla5VdnXVrIW/ZY2sHtpIEfOyc=; b=hwKt9IFfoK1ff3UwetCF7Fh+ZINA2Ja/jZWqQLRMKzweYQbrFd0ji3fT n1LVZv765O6QpeOy+De32Hyrf0uxcZTUdW9oXvdzRYXgexczErEGjFh8x RjqIfpeLGCyoXnHbLOgt3W3TkjEAwpExdhqwP2DdvZNEmGwjlbGA0LrWr sa3t0m+wxs3gt7DtZA1ntEAJdwqa9I96LTsHQwZ09OKdZe2V4Fzg4Ycf3 F3CLBWMaMzVyja1Ey8mAaGNudxbUzGM2oQOetwkuZEFy/qiNVhjl3KTuc kkzAzD9iNfesaMhmZ2SO9EmEb80+XKoDlFSz02XDgvvyg0ZdO1/1sGbZm Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DRONm+j1RyW/4L5FFOeg2A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PKnL+hxTR220Omx0xOkDhQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11865"; a="97635542" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,205,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="97635542" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Aug 2026 23:06:09 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 903ZxHqZTF2kQ1OJsQerxw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5esFQqGvQlCnkl5JvryLwQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,205,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="265546853" Received: from linux-pnp-gnr-1.sh.intel.com ([10.239.83.186]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2026 23:06:03 -0700 From: Jiebin Sun To: namhyung@kernel.org Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com, james.clark@linaro.org, jolsa@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, thomas.falcon@intel.com, tianyou.li@intel.com, wangyang.guo@intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] perf c2c: add a function view Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 14:12:50 +0800 Message-ID: <20260805061250.2006831-1-jiebin.sun@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20260803035220.172022-1-jiebin.sun@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 10:15:59AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > I'm about to merge the series. But please consider a follow-up work to > add support for --stdio and add a test case. Thanks for reviewing the series. I am working on a follow-up patch to add --stdio support for the function view and cover it in the shell tests. Since it depends on the current function-view series, I will send it for your review once this series is merged. Thanks, Jiebin