From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:35:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805143542.536E31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805133013.235016-9-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Error returns in `jit_process_dump` loop are ignored, causing subsequent records to consume stale metadata from failed parses.
- [Medium] `jit_inject` ignores the return value of `jit_process_dump` entirely, falsely reporting success on complete processing failures.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks ---
commit 57747ce97971858edaaa984c164ff79271eb0779
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks
This commit fixes memory leaks in perf jitdump by ensuring previous allocations
for debug_data and unwinding_data are freed before reassignment. It also adds
cleanup of both buffers when closing the jitdump session.
Fixes: 9b07e27f88b9 ("perf inject: Add jitdump mmap injection support")
Reported-by: sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> index 4f52b143cd0da..3085091b95a51 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -706,6 +708,7 @@ static int jit_repipe_debug_info(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)
>
> memcpy(data, &jr->info.entries, sz);
>
> + zfree(&jd->debug_data);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the error handling in
jit_repipe_debug_info() leave stale data active if a subsequent parse fails?
If malloc() fails or the payload size is malformed earlier in the function, it
returns -1 without clearing jd->debug_data. Does jit_process_dump() check this
error code, or does it continue and allow the next JIT_CODE_LOAD record to
consume the uncleared, stale debug data from a prior successful record?
tools/perf/util/jitdump.c:jit_process_dump() {
...
case JIT_CODE_DEBUG_INFO:
ret = jit_repipe_debug_info(jd, jr);
break;
...
}
> jd->debug_data = data;
>
> /*
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it intentional that jit_inject() ignores
the return value of jit_process_dump() on complete failure?
If a fatal parsing or allocation error propagates out to ret, it looks like
the error code is logged in verbose mode but ultimately discarded from the
caller:
tools/perf/util/jitdump.c:jit_inject() {
...
ret = jit_process_dump(jd);
jit_close(jd);
if (verbose > 0)
fprintf(stderr, "injected: %s (%d)\n", path, ret);
return 0;
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805133013.235016-1-acme@kernel.org?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 13:29 [PATCHES v1 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf jitdump: Fix extended header read that always fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 18:51 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf jitdump: Validate code_size against total_size in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 18:58 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf jitdump: Prevent integer underflow in debug info size calculation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 18:59 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf jitdump: Bounds-check debug entry byte-swap loop Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:00 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:07 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 19:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:29 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-07 12:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf jitdump: Fix funlockfile on unlocked stream in jit_open() error path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 15:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:09 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf jitdump: Free event in jit_repipe_code_move() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:09 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05 19:10 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf jitdump: Use dirname() return value in jit_open() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:16 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf jitdump: Validate debug entries on native (non-swap) path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:19 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf jitdump: Validate sym string NUL-termination in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:19 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:20 ` Ian Rogers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-05 21:26 [PATCHES v2 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805143542.536E31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox