From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 21:40:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805214029.43D1A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805212704.267779-6-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] In `jit_repipe_code_move`, an out-of-bounds heap read occurs when the required event size exceeds the allocated buffer, leaking heap memory into the `perf.data` file.
- [High] The dynamically allocated `event` buffer in `jit_repipe_code_move` is never freed, resulting in a memory leak.
- [Medium] The JIT event injection logic violates the perf ABI's dynamic packing rules for the `sample_id_all` suffix, leading to event data corruption.
- [Medium] The `uint64_t` variable `jd->unwinding_mapped_size` is silently truncated to a 32-bit signed `int`, potentially corrupting the event length.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH 05/12] perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size ---
commit ec3758fe10c5b2ae1b52a849ea060531bfeec315
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size
This commit fixes a heap corruption in the jitdump mmap injection code.
It clamps the return value of snprintf to the filename buffer size in both
jit_repipe_code_load() and jit_repipe_code_move() to prevent oversized
header computations when the jitted filename exceeds PATH_MAX.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> index 078d3304d2b7e..d7e3dcfc63b78 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> @@ -493,6 +493,9 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_load(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)
> jd->dir,
> nspid,
> count);
> + /* snprintf returns would-be length on truncation, clamp to buffer */
> + if (size >= sizeof(event->mmap2.filename))
> + size = sizeof(event->mmap2.filename) - 1;
>
> size++; /* for \0 */
>
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the sample ID injection in
jit_repipe_code_load() violate the dynamic packing rules for the sample_id_all
suffix?
The code casts the suffix payload to a static struct and unconditionally writes
the timestamp at offset 8:
struct {
u32 pid, tid;
u64 time;
} *id;
...
if (jd->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TIME)
id->time = convert_timestamp(jd, jr->load.p.timestamp);
If PERF_SAMPLE_TID is disabled but PERF_SAMPLE_TIME is present, shouldn't the
timestamp be placed at offset 0?
Leaving offset 0 uninitialized and forcing the timestamp into offset 8 could
corrupt the parsed timestamp and subsequent fields.
[Severity: Medium]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does jit_repipe_code_load() silently
truncate the 64-bit unwinding mapped size?
The function assigns a uint64_t from the untrusted jitdump file to a signed
32-bit int:
int ret, csize, usize;
...
usize = jd->unwinding_mapped_size;
If the mapped_size is larger than INT_MAX, wouldn't this truncate into a
negative value?
This could then be added to the code size to compute event->mmap2.len, causing
unintended subtraction or massive wraparound.
> @@ -623,6 +626,9 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_move(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)
> jd->dir,
> nspid,
> jr->move.code_index);
> + /* snprintf returns would-be length on truncation, clamp to buffer */
> + if (size >= sizeof(event->mmap2.filename))
> + size = sizeof(event->mmap2.filename) - 1;
>
> size++; /* for \0 */
>
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does jit_repipe_code_move()
have an out-of-bounds heap read when calculating the event size?
The event buffer is allocated with a hardcoded size:
event = calloc(1, sizeof(*event) + 16);
But the header.size is dynamically computed using idr_size:
event->mmap2.header.size = (sizeof(event->mmap2) - (sizeof(event->mmap2.filename) - size) + idr_size);
Since idr_size can be up to 64 bytes depending on the active sample_type, the
calculated header.size can exceed the allocated buffer by up to 48 bytes.
When perf_data__write() is later called in jit_inject_event(), couldn't this
read past the end of the allocation and leak heap memory into the perf.data
file?
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does jit_repipe_code_move() also suffer from
the same dynamic packing violation as jit_repipe_code_load()?
The same static struct layout is used for the sample ID fields:
struct {
u32 pid, tid;
u64 time;
} *id;
...
if (jd->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TIME)
id->time = convert_timestamp(jd, jr->load.p.timestamp);
This appears to corrupt the event data if PERF_SAMPLE_TID is disabled.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does jit_repipe_code_move() leak the event
buffer?
The buffer is dynamically allocated, but the function appears to return without
freeing it:
event = calloc(1, sizeof(*event) + 16);
if (!event)
return -1;
...
out:
perf_sample__exit(&sample);
return ret;
Since a jitdump file can contain thousands of code move events, wouldn't this
consume significant memory and potentially lead to out-of-memory errors during
processing?
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does jit_repipe_code_move() also truncate the
unwinding mapped size into a 32-bit integer?
Just like in jit_repipe_code_load(), the size is assigned to an int:
int usize;
...
usize = jd->unwinding_mapped_size;
Could this cause the same event length corruption if the mapped_size exceeds
INT_MAX?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805212704.267779-1-acme@kernel.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 21:26 [PATCHES v2 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf jitdump: Fix extended header read that always fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf jitdump: Validate code_size against total_size in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf jitdump: Prevent integer underflow in debug info size calculation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf jitdump: Bounds-check debug entry byte-swap loop Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf jitdump: Fix funlockfile on unlocked stream in jit_open() error path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf jitdump: Free event in jit_repipe_code_move() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf jitdump: Use dirname() return value in jit_open() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 21:27 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf jitdump: Validate debug entries on native (non-swap) path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 22:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 21:27 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf jitdump: Validate sym string NUL-termination in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 21:27 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:53 ` sashiko-bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-05 13:29 [PATCHES v1 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:07 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 19:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:29 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-07 12:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805214029.43D1A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox