Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:50:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807155051.528FB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178611682030.237811.16459191503595231339.stgit@devnote2>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr updates the hardware and shadow registers but fails to update the perf_event's canonical software state, leading to silent hardware reverts and incorrect event samples.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API ---
commit bbc277e839d1fd31bb4bfa9d695721e5b6899bf6
Author: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>

x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
    
Wprobe needs to move an active per-CPU watchpoint without releasing and
reserving its hardware slot.
    
Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() to find the installed local
slot and update only its address shadow and hardware debug address
register. Publish the shadow first so hw_breakpoint_restore() observes
the new address if an NMI interrupts the update.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/59637b96946653393a7ad3c7de094094796b39c2.1785067572.git.wangjinchao600@gmail.com/

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 9ef24b55737f8..c89f6e71c3a91 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -128,6 +128,39 @@ int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr(struct perf_event *bp,
> +					  unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw;
> +	struct perf_event_attr attr = bp->attr;
> +	unsigned int seq;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> +	attr.bp_addr = addr;
> +	ret = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, &attr, &hw);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

[Severity: High]
Does this discard the validated software state?

The new address configuration is successfully validated into the local 'hw'
struct, but neither the architecture-specific state (counter_arch_bp(bp))
nor the core attribute (bp->attr.bp_addr) are updated.

If the breakpoint is later re-installed (e.g., during CPU offline/online or
PMU scheduling), arch_install_hw_breakpoint() will read the stale address:

    struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
    ...
    this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], info->address);
    barrier();
    set_debugreg(info->address, i);

Could this silently revert the hardware register back to the old address?

Also, if a watchpoint fires, perf_bp_event() initializes the sample record
using the unmodified bp->attr.bp_addr. Could this result in reporting
incorrect addresses in the trace output?

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < HBP_NUM; i++) {
> +		if (this_cpu_read(bp_per_reg[i]) == bp)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (WARN_ONCE(i == HBP_NUM, "Can't find any breakpoint slot"))
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	do {
> +		seq = this_cpu_inc_return(cpu_dr7_seq);
> +		this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], addr);
> +		barrier();
> +		set_debugreg(addr, i);
> +	} while (seq != this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7_seq));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/178611679753.237811.10190793347982785419.stgit@devnote2?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07 15:33 [PATCH v12 00/11] tracing: wprobe: x86: Add wprobe for watchpoint Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Make DR7 updates NMI safe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 16:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:50   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] HWBP: Add modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] tracing/wprobe: Add wprobe (watchpoint probe) trace event support Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] x86: hw_breakpoint: Add a kconfig to clarify when a breakpoint fires Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] selftests: tracing: Add syntax " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] tracing/wprobe: Add set_wprobe and clear_wprobe event triggers Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] selftests: ftrace: Add wprobe trigger testcase Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:35 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF typecast in fetchargs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:35 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF struct offset resolution in set_wprobe trigger Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:59   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807155051.528FB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox