From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:50:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807155051.528FB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178611682030.237811.16459191503595231339.stgit@devnote2>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr updates the hardware and shadow registers but fails to update the perf_event's canonical software state, leading to silent hardware reverts and incorrect event samples.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API ---
commit bbc277e839d1fd31bb4bfa9d695721e5b6899bf6
Author: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
Wprobe needs to move an active per-CPU watchpoint without releasing and
reserving its hardware slot.
Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() to find the installed local
slot and update only its address shadow and hardware debug address
register. Publish the shadow first so hw_breakpoint_restore() observes
the new address if an NMI interrupts the update.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/59637b96946653393a7ad3c7de094094796b39c2.1785067572.git.wangjinchao600@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 9ef24b55737f8..c89f6e71c3a91 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -128,6 +128,39 @@ int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr(struct perf_event *bp,
> + unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw;
> + struct perf_event_attr attr = bp->attr;
> + unsigned int seq;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> + attr.bp_addr = addr;
> + ret = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, &attr, &hw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
[Severity: High]
Does this discard the validated software state?
The new address configuration is successfully validated into the local 'hw'
struct, but neither the architecture-specific state (counter_arch_bp(bp))
nor the core attribute (bp->attr.bp_addr) are updated.
If the breakpoint is later re-installed (e.g., during CPU offline/online or
PMU scheduling), arch_install_hw_breakpoint() will read the stale address:
struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
...
this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], info->address);
barrier();
set_debugreg(info->address, i);
Could this silently revert the hardware register back to the old address?
Also, if a watchpoint fires, perf_bp_event() initializes the sample record
using the unmodified bp->attr.bp_addr. Could this result in reporting
incorrect addresses in the trace output?
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HBP_NUM; i++) {
> + if (this_cpu_read(bp_per_reg[i]) == bp)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (WARN_ONCE(i == HBP_NUM, "Can't find any breakpoint slot"))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + do {
> + seq = this_cpu_inc_return(cpu_dr7_seq);
> + this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], addr);
> + barrier();
> + set_debugreg(addr, i);
> + } while (seq != this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7_seq));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/178611679753.237811.10190793347982785419.stgit@devnote2?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 15:33 [PATCH v12 00/11] tracing: wprobe: x86: Add wprobe for watchpoint Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Make DR7 updates NMI safe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] HWBP: Add modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] tracing/wprobe: Add wprobe (watchpoint probe) trace event support Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] x86: hw_breakpoint: Add a kconfig to clarify when a breakpoint fires Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] selftests: tracing: Add syntax " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] tracing/wprobe: Add set_wprobe and clear_wprobe event triggers Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] selftests: ftrace: Add wprobe trigger testcase Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:35 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF typecast in fetchargs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:35 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF struct offset resolution in set_wprobe trigger Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260807155051.528FB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox