Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: sashiko-bot@kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/12] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 14:35:32 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830143532.0c2aee25c656896388e6bab7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260822093638.8E6971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>

On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:36:38 +0000
sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:

> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] Unreachable error handling logic due to early exit under 'set -e'.
> --
> 
> --- Patch [7]: [PATCH v13 07/12] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe ---
> commit 6d72a05750c5dfc08de6b03a6fc65e5144b20b9f
> Author: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe
> 
> Add an add_remove_wprobe.tc testcase for testing wprobe events that
> tests adding and removing operations.
> 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_wprobe.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_wprobe.tc
> > new file mode 100644
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_wprobe.tc
> > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# description: Generic dynamic event - add/remove wprobe events
> > +# requires: dynamic_events "w[:[<group>/][<event>]] [r|w|rw]@<addr>[:<len>]":README
> > +
> > +echo 0 > events/enable
> > +echo > dynamic_events
> > +
> > +# Use jiffies as a variable that is frequently written to.
> > +TARGET=jiffies
> > +
> > +echo "w:my_wprobe w@$TARGET" >> dynamic_events
> > +
> > +if ! grep -q my_wprobe dynamic_events; then
> > +    echo "Failed to create wprobe event"
> > +    exit_fail
> > +fi
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Since the ftracetest framework runs these scripts with set -e (errexit) 
> enabled, will this script exit immediately if the kernel rejects the event 
> creation and the echo command fails?
> 
> If so, the subsequent diagnostic grep check and exit_fail call wouldn't be
> reached, leading to a silent failure without the intended error message.

This is expected, the later grep checks whether if creation command succeeded
but the event is not shown in the dynamic_events. Different check.

> > +
> > +if [ ! -d events/wprobes/my_wprobe ]; then
> > +    echo "Failed to create wprobe event directory"
> > +    exit_fail
> > +fi
> > +
> > +echo 1 > events/wprobes/my_wprobe/enable
> > +
> > +# Check if the event is enabled
> > +if ! grep -q 1 events/wprobes/my_wprobe/enable; then
> > +    echo "Failed to enable wprobe event"
> > +    exit_fail
> > +fi
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Similarly, if enabling the wprobe fails at the sysfs boundary, would this
> echo cause an early exit and bypass the diagnostic error message here as well?

Also, this is a kind of double check. Even if writing 1 to enable
succeeded, it is failed to set internal flag. This checks such problem.

> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > +echo "-:my_wprobe" >> dynamic_events
> > +
> > +if grep -q my_wprobe dynamic_events; then
> > +    echo "Failed to remove wprobe event"
> > +    exit_fail
> > +fi
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Could this echo also trigger an early exit if removing the wprobe fails,
> bypassing the failure message?

Ditto.

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-30  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-22  9:22 [PATCH v13 00/12] tracing: wprobe: x86: Add wprobe for watchpoint Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:22 ` [PATCH v13 01/12] kprobes: Protect kprobe_blacklist with RCU Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-22  9:22 ` [PATCH v13 02/12] x86/hw_breakpoints: Make DR7 updates NMI safe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30  5:35     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-22  9:22 ` [PATCH v13 03/12] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-22  9:23 ` [PATCH v13 04/12] HWBP: Add modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-22  9:24 ` [PATCH v13 05/12] tracing/wprobe: Add wprobe (watchpoint probe) trace event support Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30  5:35     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-22  9:24 ` [PATCH v13 06/12] x86: hw_breakpoint: Add a kconfig to clarify when a breakpoint fires Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-22  9:24 ` [PATCH v13 07/12] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30  5:35     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-08-22  9:24 ` [PATCH v13 08/12] selftests: tracing: Add syntax " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30  5:35     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-22  9:24 ` [PATCH v13 09/12] tracing/wprobe: Add set_wprobe and clear_wprobe event triggers Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30  5:35     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-22  9:25 ` [PATCH v13 10/12] selftests: ftrace: Add wprobe trigger testcase Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30  5:36     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-22  9:25 ` [PATCH v13 11/12] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF typecast in fetchargs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-22  9:25 ` [PATCH v13 12/12] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF struct offset resolution in set_wprobe trigger Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-22  9:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30  5:36     ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260830143532.0c2aee25c656896388e6bab7@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox