From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] perf tools top: Add --weight option
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:43:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830194358.0584A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830193459.2840519-3-ak@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Buffer overflow or NULL pointer dereference in for_each_drm_fdinfo_in_dir() due to unchecked reallocarray() failure.
- [High] Use-After-Free and memory leak in add_event() when strndup() fails.
--
commit f1674c1fafe728985095507f0cfd95caa7a7179c
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
perf tools top: Add --weight option
Add a -W/--weight option to perf top to collect weights too. Useful with
follow on patches.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> index af3e4230c72f4..2da2a16bbf260 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ OPTIONS
> --count=<count>::
> Event period to sample.
>
> +-W::
> +--weight::
> +Enable weighted sampling. One or more additional weights can be recorded per sample
[ ... ]
While reviewing this, I noticed some pre-existing issues in
tools/perf/util/drm_pmu.c:
tools/perf/util/drm_pmu.c:for_each_drm_fdinfo_in_dir() {
...
if (minors->minors_num == minors->minors_len) {
unsigned int *tmp = reallocarray(minors->minors, minors->minors_len + 4,
sizeof(unsigned int));
if (tmp) {
minors->minors = tmp;
minors->minors_len += 4;
}
}
minors->minors[minors->minors_num++] = minor;
...
}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code write out of bounds or
dereference a NULL pointer?
If reallocarray() fails, tmp is NULL, so minors->minors and minors->minors_len
are not updated.
However, the function proceeds to unconditionally assign minor to
minors->minors[minors->minors_num++].
If the array was initially NULL, this dereferences a NULL pointer. If it was
already allocated, this writes past the end of the un-resized buffer.
tools/perf/util/drm_pmu.c:add_event() {
...
tmp = reallocarray(*events, *num_events + 1, sizeof(struct drm_pmu_event));
if (!tmp)
return -ENOMEM;
tmp[*num_events].unit = unit;
tmp[*num_events].desc = desc;
tmp[*num_events].name = strndup(line, colon - line);
if (!tmp[*num_events].name)
return -ENOMEM;
(*num_events)++;
*events = tmp;
return 0;
}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code leave a dangling pointer and
leak memory when strndup() fails?
If reallocarray() succeeds and moves the memory block, the old memory pointed
to by *events is freed.
If strndup() then fails, the function returns -ENOMEM without updating
*events to point to tmp.
This leaks the newly allocated tmp block and leaves *events as a dangling
pointer to the old, freed memory block.
Since the caller read_drm_pmus_cb() ignores the return value of add_event()
and continues parsing, a subsequent match could pass this dangling *events
pointer back into reallocarray(), triggering a use-after-free.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830193459.2840519-1-ak@linux.intel.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 19:34 v5 of the perf weight annotation patchkit Andi Kleen
2026-08-30 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] perf tools record: Modernize -W man page Andi Kleen
2026-08-30 19:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] perf tools top: Add --weight option Andi Kleen
2026-08-30 19:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2026-08-30 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] perf tools: Add support for displaying weights in annotate Andi Kleen
2026-08-30 19:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] perf tools: Add test for weight annotation Andi Kleen
2026-08-30 19:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 18:32 ` Andi Kleen
2026-09-01 15:14 ` v5 of the perf weight annotation patchkit Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830194358.0584A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox