From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yilin Zhang" <yilinzhang@moonshot.ai>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf: Fix use-after-free when perf mmap() revival races with the last munmap()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:50:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831135038.AEDC61F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831133152.1231045-1-yilinzhang@moonshot.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Permanent leak of locked_vm accounting when mmapping the same perf event ring buffer or AUX buffer multiple times.
--
commit bd560c15b9fb2009d96bf58b9046c04989905b44
Author: Yilin Zhang <yilinzhang@moonshot.ai>
perf: Fix use-after-free when perf mmap() revival races with the last munmap()
This commit fixes a use-after-free vulnerability in the perf events subsystem
by swapping the order of counter decrements in perf_mmap_close(). The change
ensures that event->mmap_count is decremented first under the mmap_mutex,
closing a race window where a newly attached ring buffer could be mistakenly
freed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20260804060931.711308-1-david.lee@trailofbits.com/
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index a6c8e38a31104..f56f9d9e4f01b 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -7060,17 +7059,14 @@ static void perf_mmap_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> mutex_unlock(&rb->aux_mutex);
> }
>
> - if (refcount_dec_and_test(&rb->mmap_count))
> - detach_rest = true;
> -
> - if (!refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&event->mmap_count, &event->mmap_mutex))
> - goto out_put;
> -
> - ring_buffer_attach(event, NULL);
> - mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
> + if (refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&event->mmap_count,
> + &event->mmap_mutex)) {
> + ring_buffer_attach(event, NULL);
> + mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
> + }
>
> /* If there's still other mmap()s of this buffer, we're done. */
> - if (!detach_rest)
> + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&rb->mmap_count))
> goto out_put;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the early return here leak the
locked_vm accounting when the same perf event ring buffer or AUX buffer is
mmapped multiple times?
Looking at the mmap side in perf_mmap_rb() and perf_mmap_aux(), secondary
mmaps repeatedly charge the user's locked_vm:
kernel/events/core.c:perf_mmap_rb() {
...
perf_mmap_account(vma, user_extra, extra);
refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count);
...
}
kernel/events/core.c:perf_mmap_aux() {
...
perf_mmap_account(vma, user_extra, extra);
refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count);
...
}
However, the unaccounting in perf_mmap_close() only happens exactly once when
the last mmap is closed and rb->mmap_count reaches zero:
kernel/events/core.c:perf_mmap_close() {
...
if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&rb->mmap_count))
goto out_put;
...
perf_mmap_unaccount(vma, rb);
out_put:
ring_buffer_put(rb);
}
Because locked_vm is used system-wide to enforce RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (e.g., by
io_uring, BPF, XDP, and secretmem), an attacker could trivially loop calling
mmap() on the same file descriptor to artificially inflate this counter until
the limit is exhausted.
Does this create a persistent Denial of Service for all processes running
under that UID, making the system fully unusable for the affected user's
services until all processes of that user exit?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831133152.1231045-1-yilinzhang@moonshot.ai?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 13:31 [PATCH v3] perf: Fix use-after-free when perf mmap() revival races with the last munmap() Yilin Zhang
2026-08-31 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-31 15:13 ` Yilin Zhang
2026-08-31 13:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831135038.AEDC61F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yilinzhang@moonshot.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox