From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yilin Zhang" <yilinzhang@moonshot.ai>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf: Fix use-after-free when perf mmap() revival races with the last munmap()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:10:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831191007.59A6E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831162155.1437652-1-yilinzhang@moonshot.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Preexisting memory accounting leak for locked_vm when mmap() is called multiple times on the same perf event (alias mmaps).
--
commit a96fa5a03867a00fbbf2c3b6dd3bf82931c0fdde
Author: Yilin Zhang <yilinzhang@moonshot.ai>
perf: Fix use-after-free when perf mmap() revival races with the last munmap()
This commit swaps the order of counter updates in perf_mmap_close() to fix
a page-level use-after-free. It drops event->mmap_count first, serializing
its 1 -> 0 transition and ring_buffer_attach() with perf_mmap(), preventing
buffer revival after rb->mmap_count reaches zero.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20260804060931.711308-1-david.lee@trailofbits.com/
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index a6c8e38a31104..f02780529b439 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -7060,17 +7059,18 @@ static void perf_mmap_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> mutex_unlock(&rb->aux_mutex);
> }
>
> - if (refcount_dec_and_test(&rb->mmap_count))
> - detach_rest = true;
> -
> - if (!refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&event->mmap_count, &event->mmap_mutex))
> - goto out_put;
> -
> - ring_buffer_attach(event, NULL);
> - mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
> + /*
> + * Drop references in reverse order of perf_mmap() to prevent
> + * rb revival after rb->mmap_count reaches zero.
> + */
> + if (refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&event->mmap_count,
> + &event->mmap_mutex)) {
> + ring_buffer_attach(event, NULL);
> + mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
> + }
>
> /* If there's still other mmap()s of this buffer, we're done. */
> - if (!detach_rest)
> + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&rb->mmap_count))
> goto out_put;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this goto bypass the unaccounting for
all but the final close?
If an application calls mmap() on the same perf event file descriptor multiple
times, perf_mmap_rb() accounts user_extra to current_user()->locked_vm on
every alias mmap:
kernel/events/core.c:perf_mmap_rb() {
...
perf_mmap_account(vma, user_extra, extra);
refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count);
return 0;
...
}
When munmap() is called for all of them, perf_mmap_close() only calls
perf_mmap_unaccount() when rb->mmap_count drops to zero, which happens only
once.
Could this permanently leak locked_vm charges on every alias munmap,
potentially exhausting the user's RLIMIT_MEMLOCK quota and causing a Denial
of Service for other subsystems (like BPF or io_uring) relying on it?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831162155.1437652-1-yilinzhang@moonshot.ai?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 16:21 [PATCH v4] perf: Fix use-after-free when perf mmap() revival races with the last munmap() Yilin Zhang
2026-08-31 19:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831191007.59A6E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yilinzhang@moonshot.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox