Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexandru Elisei" <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 15/28] KVM: arm64: Use PMSVer from the assigned SPE instance
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:41:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903164127.497DB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903160623.315525-16-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kvm_spe_finalize_idregs() unconditionally overwrites the user-provided ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMSVer with the host's physical version on the first KVM_RUN, breaking live migration.
- [High] sanitise_id_aa64dfr0_el1() evaluates PMSVer dynamically based on the assigned SPE PMU, returning 0 if called before the PMU is assigned, which breaks KVM_SET_ONE_REG validation.
- [High] kvm_spe_finalize_idregs() is skipped if a vCPU without SPE runs first in a heterogeneous VM, permanently leaving PMSVer as 0 and hiding SPE from the guest.
--

commit 45e0320e2eaeb926a33b978420aa5a133c7a42c6
Author: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

KVM: arm64: Use PMSVer from the assigned SPE instance

This commit updates KVM to initialize the VM's ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMSVer using
the SPE PMU instance assigned to the VM rather than the physical CPU executing
the vCPU init ioctl. This is intended to handle heterogeneous systems where
SPE instances may have different versions or be entirely absent on some CPUs.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
> index fa87d224c8af8..4426d614a9e0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -87,6 +87,30 @@ bool kvm_spe_pmu_set(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	return !!kvm->arch.kvm_spe.spe_pmu;
>  }
>  
> +void kvm_spe_finalize_idregs(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = kvm->arch.kvm_spe.spe_pmu;
> +	u64 reg;
> +
> +	if (!spe_pmu)
> +		return;
> +
> +	reg = kvm_read_vm_id_reg(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
> +	reg &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_MASK;
> +	reg |= SYS_FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMSVer, spe_pmu->pmsver);
> +	kvm_set_vm_id_reg(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, reg);
> +}

[Severity: High]
Does this unconditionally overwrite the user-provided ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMSVer
value on the first KVM_RUN?

If a VMM restores ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 during live migration (for example, when
migrating from an older host to a newer one), kvm_spe_finalize_idregs() will
silently clobber the userspace-configured value and force it back to the host
hardware's version. Could this violate the KVM ABI and break live migration
sequences?

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 44aae52c473d7..a6bb6884b965a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -2220,8 +2220,11 @@ static u64 sanitise_id_aa64dfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
>  		val |= SYS_FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMUVer,
>  				      kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
>  
> -	/* Hide SPE from guests */
>  	val &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_MASK;
> +	if (vcpu_has_spe(vcpu))
> +		val |= SYS_FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMSVer,
> +				      kvm_spe_get_pmsver(vcpu->kvm));

[Severity: High]
Can this dynamic evaluation break KVM_SET_ONE_REG validation during VM setup?

VMMs like QEMU typically restore VM ID registers via KVM_SET_ONE_REG
immediately after KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, before configuring device attributes.
Because sanitise_id_aa64dfr0_el1() evaluates PMSVer based on the assigned SPE
PMU, kvm_spe_get_pmsver() returns 0 until the SPE PMU is assigned.

This strict ordering dependency will cause KVM_SET_ONE_REG to reject valid,
non-zero userspace values with -EINVAL, which breaks standard live migration
sequences.

[ ... ]
> @@ -5928,6 +5931,9 @@ int kvm_finalize_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		kvm_vgic_finalize_idregs(kvm);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (vcpu_has_spe(vcpu))
> +		kvm_spe_finalize_idregs(kvm);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

[Severity: High]
Can this leave PMSVer permanently set to 0 in a heterogeneous VM if a vCPU
without SPE runs first?

kvm_finalize_sys_regs() executes on the first KVM_RUN for a given VM. It uses
a per-vCPU feature check (vcpu_has_spe(vcpu)) to guard the VM-wide ID register
initialization in kvm_spe_finalize_idregs(kvm).

If the first scheduled vCPU happens to lack SPE, vcpu_has_spe(vcpu) evaluates
to false and kvm_spe_finalize_idregs(kvm) is skipped. The VM is then marked
with KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, meaning SPE initialization is skipped forever.
This would permanently hide SPE from all vCPUs in the VM.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903160623.315525-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com?part=15

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 16:05 [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/28] arm64/sysreg: Add the nVM field to PMBLIMITR_EL1 Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/28] arm64/sysreg: Define MDCR_EL2.E2PB values Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/28] KVM: arm64: Add CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE Kconfig option Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Add PMBIDR_EL1 and PMSIDR_EL1 to struct arm_spe_pmu Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_SPE capability Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_SPE VCPU feature Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if protected KVM is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Enable SPE virtualization only in VHE mode Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if nested virt is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/28] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the interrupt number Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the SPE device Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04  9:32     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to initialize SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/28] KVM: arm64: Use PMSVer from the assigned SPE instance Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:41   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 10:26     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 10:28     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/28] KVM: arm64: Apply a RES0 mask to PMBLIMITR_EL1 writes Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 10:41     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/28] KVM: arm64: config: Use functions from spe.c to test FEAT_SPE_{FnE,FDS} Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/28] KVM: arm64: VHE: Context switch SPE state Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 11:35     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/28] KVM: arm64: Allow guest SPE physical timestamps only if kernel allows it Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 13:45     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/28] KVM: arm64: Handle SPE maintenance interrupts Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:04     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/28] arm64: errata: Disable SPE in KVM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add kvm-arm.ignore_spe_errata kernel parameter Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/28] arm64: errata: Don't enable guest buffer if misprogrammed Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/28] KVM: arm64: at: Use callback for reading descriptor Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/28] KVM: arm64: Map memory on a SPE stage 2 fault Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/28] KVM: arm64: Handle dirty page logging when SPE feature is set Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:41     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/28] KVM: arm64: Allow the creation of a SPE enabled VM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:09     ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260903164127.497DB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox