Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aaron Tomlin" <atomlin@atomlin.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 perf-tools-next 3/6] perf trace: Validate payload bounds in augmented buffer beautifier
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 02:07:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907020724.2C9251F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907015140.363076-4-atomlin@atomlin.com>

> When pretty-printing non-string augmented buffers via
> syscall_arg__scnprintf_buf(), augmented_arg->size is not validated
> against the remaining buffer size (arg->augmented.size).
> 
> If a malformed or truncated perf.data record provides an invalid or
> excessively large augmented_arg->size:
>     1.  If arg->augmented.size is smaller than sizeof(*augmented_arg),
>         dereferencing augmented_arg->size reads past the available
>         buffer.
> 
>     2.  The loop reads up to augmented_arg->size bytes from
>         augmented_arg->value without verifying that they exist within
>         the buffer, leading to buffer over-reads.
> 
>     3.  Calculating consumed = sizeof(*augmented_arg) +
>         augmented_arg->size can overflow signed integer bounds or cause
>         arg->augmented.size to underflow, advancing arg->augmented.args
>         out of bounds and corrupting the parsing state for subsequent
>         arguments in multi-argument syscalls.
> 
> Validate that arg->augmented.size is large enough to hold
> sizeof(*augmented_arg) and that augmented_arg->size is within the bounds
> of the remaining buffer before iterating or calculating consumed bytes.
> If validation fails, fall back to printing the raw pointer value.
> 
> Fixes: b257fac12f38 ("perf trace: Pretty print buffer data")
> Reported-by: sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907015140.363076-1-atomlin@atomlin.com?part=3


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07  1:51 [PATCH v2 perf-tools-next 0/6] perf trace: Validate payload bounds across augmented argument beautifiers Aaron Tomlin
2026-09-07  1:51 ` [PATCH v2 perf-tools-next 1/6] perf trace: Add upper bound checks for augmented BTF struct printing Aaron Tomlin
2026-09-07  2:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07  1:51 ` [PATCH v2 perf-tools-next 2/6] perf trace: Validate payload bounds in augmented string beautifier Aaron Tomlin
2026-09-07  2:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07  1:51 ` [PATCH v2 perf-tools-next 3/6] perf trace: Validate payload bounds in augmented buffer beautifier Aaron Tomlin
2026-09-07  2:07   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07  1:51 ` [PATCH v2 perf-tools-next 4/6] perf trace beauty: Validate payload size in augmented timespec beautifier Aaron Tomlin
2026-09-07  2:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07  1:51 ` [PATCH v2 perf-tools-next 5/6] perf trace beauty: Validate payload size in augmented sockaddr beautifier Aaron Tomlin
2026-09-07  2:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07  1:51 ` [PATCH v2 perf-tools-next 6/6] perf trace beauty: Validate payload size in augmented perf_event_open beautifier Aaron Tomlin
2026-09-07  2:06   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260907020724.2C9251F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox